Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/03/2008 4:31:59 PM PST by hamboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: hamboy

“Constitutional Lawyer”, what a dead-end job THAT’s got to be!


2 posted on 12/03/2008 4:38:42 PM PST by gorush (History repeats itself because human nature is static)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hamboy
~yawn~

We've already played this game. Only the House and Senate can do anything about high crimes and misdemeanors by the "president", and the Democrats have already demonstrated that they don't care even when the evidence is as plain as a stain with DNA confirmation. To use a favorite phrase of the socialists: Move on. Obama "won", and fair or not, qualified or not, citizen or not, none of that matters to the Democrats who have power - not when they now have power, the one thing they care about.

3 posted on 12/03/2008 4:39:10 PM PST by MathDoc (War is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is Strength. Obama is Good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Here's the link to John P. Connolly, The Bulettin...

http://www.thebulletin.us/site/news.cfm?newsid=20210273

4 posted on 12/03/2008 4:40:27 PM PST by hamboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hamboy

If Obama takes the oath, it will mean another civil war. I believe that if the Supreme Court does not act (thereby proving they too are part of the conspiracy), it will be up to the military.


5 posted on 12/03/2008 4:41:15 PM PST by FFranco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hamboy

Did this author discuss the fact that even before the any swearing-in oath, O may have perjured himself 57 times?

O is developing a tic because he knows he may be subject to criminal fraud charges.

He is, after all, an attorney and a constitutional law lecturer who certified to each of the several SOS’s that he was a natural born citizen (criminal liability).
And, along the way he raked in a lot of cash (perhaps civil liability).

And, in this case there is “controlling legal authority”.


6 posted on 12/03/2008 4:41:27 PM PST by frog in a pot (Is there a definition of "domestic enemies" as used in federal oaths, or is that just lip service?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Until this issue is resolved I will consider the 0bama presidency a illegitimate REGIME.

And I as well as many others (I hope) will refer to it in the same tone.

9 posted on 12/03/2008 4:45:53 PM PST by Rabble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hamboy

“It has almost revolutionary consequences, if you think about it.”


14 posted on 12/03/2008 4:52:38 PM PST by combat_boots ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."Aldous Huxley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hamboy

The headline in red is simply wrong. The guy is NOT stating flat out that Obama taking the oath will be perjury; he’s saying it will IF... There’s a difference.


15 posted on 12/03/2008 4:54:28 PM PST by gracesdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hamboy
“He may have nominated people to different positions; he may have nominated people to the judicial branch, who may have been confirmed, they may have gone out on xecutive duty and done various things,” said Mr. Vieira. “The people that he’s put into the judicial branch may have decided cases, and all of that needs to be unzipped.”

Sit down Bill, it has nothing to do with you, no interns involved in this.
16 posted on 12/03/2008 4:57:09 PM PST by mkjessup (The lamestream media WELCOMES our new Communist/Obamunist Overlords & Politburo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hamboy

Great post! This case is beginning the grow legs!

http://www.rallycongress.com/constitutional-qualification/1244


17 posted on 12/03/2008 4:58:04 PM PST by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hamboy

The language of the Keyes’ lawsuit (see below) is in concordance with Mr. Vieira, that by refusing to be forthcoming Senator Obama is precipitating a ‘constitutional crises.’

Furthermore, IF Senator Obama is NOT a citizen and ‘ KNOWINGLY filed a false ‘nomination paper or declaration of candidacy’ — then he is also guilty of a crime.

‘Oh what a tangled web we weave, When first we practice to deceive.’ (Sir Walter Scott )

THE KEYES’ LAWSUIT:

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE

http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/AlanKeyesSuit.pdf

Excerpt:

76. An unprecedented and looming constitutional crisis awaits if a President elected by the popular vote and the electoral vote does not constitutionally qualify to serve in that capacity. In addition, if Senator Obama is not a “natural born” citizen and not eligible for presidency, Senator Obama will be subject to the criminal Provisions of the California Elections Code, stating, “Any person who files or submit for filing a nomination paper or declaration of candidacy knowing that it, or any part of it, has been made falsely is punishable by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000) or by imprisonment in the state prison for 16 months or two or three years or by both the fine and imprisonment” (California Elections Code § 18203). Further, Senator Obama, SOS, the Governor of the State of California, and all of the California Electors may be subject to the penal provisions of the California Elections Code which states, “Any person who commits fraud and any person who aids or abets fraud or attempts to aid or abet fraud, in connection with any vote cast, to be cast, or attempted to be cast, is guilty of felony, punishable by imprisonment for 16 months or two or three years” (California Elections Code § 18500 ).

STE=Q


27 posted on 12/03/2008 5:26:21 PM PST by STE=Q ("These are the times that try men's souls." -- Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hamboy

So my husband, who is not a FReeper, but is semi-interested in what I find, says I should forward this article** to Supremes and tell everyone I know to do same.

Think it will do any good?

**The thing that he thinks this article points out that is of particular importance over some of the others is the nightmare scenario of what happens should the court ignore the birth certificate cases prior to inauguration and the Supremes’ culpability for the problems that ensue post-inauguration.


32 posted on 12/03/2008 5:42:59 PM PST by Freedom56v2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hamboy

Thanks for posting this...

Two points:

1. If you go to the Philadelphia Bulletin, under letters to editor, you can find the original posting on the Bulletin:

http://www.thebulletin.us/site/index.cfm?newsid=20210273&BRD=2737&PAG=461&dept_id=576361&rfi=8

2. I know I have seen contact information for the Supremes on FR, anyone have that link?


33 posted on 12/03/2008 5:52:46 PM PST by Freedom56v2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JDoutrider; glock rocks; Pete-R-Bilt

This isn’t going to go away, no matter what anyone is wishing.


36 posted on 12/03/2008 5:56:25 PM PST by B4Ranch ( Veterans: "There is no expiration date on our oath, to protect America from all enemies, ...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hamboy

No birth certificate. No peace.
Zero will be an illegal usurper, in a hostile occupation of OUR White House and OUR Office of the President of The United States of America.
May he be discovered for the liar he is sooner rather than later.
Can good triumph over evil this one time PLEASE?


37 posted on 12/03/2008 5:59:00 PM PST by TheConservativeParty ("A ship in harbor is safe, but that is not why the ship was built." by The First Gal of AK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hamboy
and assuming he’s aware he’s not a citizen, then it’s a perjured oath.”

What's a little perjured oath among democrats? Move along now

That picture is positively evil looking!

54 posted on 12/03/2008 6:38:05 PM PST by CAluvdubya (Sarah's my girl! Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hamboy

I am so sick of this crap.


62 posted on 12/03/2008 7:24:57 PM PST by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hamboy

To All:

This is something I wrote to a ‘critic’ on another thread:

I don’t think you understand the ramifications of someone who is not a natural born citizen... someone who may have divided loyalties or allegiance to another country etc.... becoming the most powerful man in the world: the President of the united states.

I don’t care if he/she is more conservative than Rush Limbaugh, if he/she is NOT a ‘natural born citizen’ — as enumerated in our guiding document, the Constitution Of the United States — he is disqualified from being OUR President.

The ‘natural born citizen’ prevision — along with age requirements — was wisely placed in our constitution for good reason.

We are either a country of laws or we are not.

If Mr. Obama — even on his way to the Presidency — is able to circumvent the law of the land: where does that leave us?

This is how tyrants come to power.

This is how tyrants in the past HAVE come to power.

This is how a tyrant in the future may come to power.

If Mr. Obama turns out to be a natural born citizen, I will not feel foolish in the least.

Being protective of our constitution is a duty — not a sin.

Indeed, lacking vigilance in our duty can cost us our priceless liberty.

I would rather ere on the side of caution, then risk losing what so many have given their lives to secure.

STE=Q


67 posted on 12/03/2008 8:12:07 PM PST by STE=Q ("These are the times that try men's souls." -- Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hamboy

And if you ask a military recuit to swear an oath to ‘’defend and protect’’ and he says ‘well, sorta’ where do you go from there?


83 posted on 12/04/2008 6:40:17 PM PST by Waco (understand the meaning of illegal???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LucyT; AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; george76; ..

-first Obama pardon sidebar-

Tony Rezko to be sentenced on January 6th
hillbuzz.wordpress.com | December 2, 2008 | hillbuzz
Posted on 12/02/2008 5:20:23 PM PST by Free ThinkerNY
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2141831/posts


84 posted on 12/06/2008 2:37:16 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile finally updated Saturday, December 6, 2008 !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson