Skip to comments.Vanity Q: Obama's sister's claims??
Posted on 12/28/2008 9:56:54 AM PST by Proud2BAmerican
I don't know if this is the proper way to format a vanity, but I figured someone on FR would know the answer to this question.
I have seen in many Obama-birth-certificate-related articles the claim that Maya Soetoro-Ng has given two different locations for the birth hospital of Obama. Most recently I've seen this claim made in World Net Daily articles on the subject.
The problem is that I've been unable to verify this was the case. I've contacted WND, and they've ignored me -- I simply asked for attribution. No response thus far.
Does anyone have any reliable proof that Soetoro-Ng has, on different occasions, given different answers to the question of which hospital Obamaw was born in? I am talking about the original articles that quote her on this subject, or the original author who claims she told him/her this.
Thanks ahead of time.
try a search on YouTube,duh
Obama’s sister gave an interview to a magazine in 2004 in which she said that Jr was born at Queen’s Medical Center. The magazine had the name Rainbow in it, I can’t recall its’ exact name.
By 2007 she gave an interview to yet another media source and said he was born at Kapiolani Women’s and Children’s Hospital. You may try a google or metacrawler search for “Maya Soetoro Ng 2004 interview” and then update the request to the more recent interview. I suggest you use metacrawler as they provide links to sources different than those found with a google search.
Even different country wiki posts show this discrepancy of birth place.
The U.S. Supreme court is complicit in this matter. They know or, in the very least, must have strong suspicions regarding this matter and yet choose to ignore it.
"He was born in Kapiolani Medical Center for Women & Children, two blocks up from where our grandmother still resides ... the place where he used to stick orange peels under his bed, where it got all dried out and ... nasty."
Here's one quote. I believe that the Honolulu Star-Bulletin is regular newspaper.
A reply above gave the name of the second hospital.
This is from World Net Daily. See, WND ain't so bad.
All we are saying is
Give surcease a chance
Why would anyone view YouTube as a prime research tool? According to YouTube videos everyone killed in or by Iraq over the last 40 years was the fault of the US and all of the chemical weapons Saddam had were sold to him by the US.
Bingo! We’re setting a precedent here. From this point on, candidates will not need to meet requirements, Constitutional or other. The “will of the people” will supercede the law. Once our legal foundation is gone, we will have anarchy. It’s happening already, as laws aren’t enforced with consistency or fairness.
This is why the birth certificate issue is important.
Your question is a valid one fer’shure...just sittin’in the rocking chair up here on my front porch in Vermont
“Why would anyone view YouTube as a prime research tool?”
If you see video of someone in the flesh saying what they know to be true, then it’s a valid source. If it was a 2nd or 3rd hand account it would be different. No doubt some of these are faked, but that usually ends up being revealed...sooner or later.
Certainly there's no need for some to meet those pesky requirements.
To hold Obama accountable for anything could cause "a constitutional crisis" and we can't have that. Can we?
(Gotta be careful with that Chicago investigation lest it leads to Obama and cause "a constitutional crisis," say some pundits.)
Constitutional crisis. Hey! It's better than screaming, "Racist!" Screaming "Racist!" is soooooooooo 20th century -- it's good to see that the lefties have updated their attack technology.
You clearly didn’t read more than that one sentence.
Go watch a Michael Moore movie and tell me you can see someone on film say something and be sure it’s true. YouTube videos regularly make Michael Moore films seem honest.
I would think the Philip Berg lawsuit would be a good place to start researching this. His website is obamacrimes.com and has a section dedicated to all the court filings.
WND has a search facility and of course there's always the search engines. Please see my reply #6.
WND has a search facility and of course there's always the search engines. Both find the proof.
Please see my replies #5 and #6. Those were found with google and #6 was a link to WND itself. I could have started with WND.
I am compelled to post this reply to you, et al in hopes that the Freepers who malign WND might see this and thus get a clue.
Chief, have you anything in your research that may throw some light on this question? If I attempt to reply I will only create more confusion. I’m reminded of the Nordyke article, how she ‘met Madelyn on a cruise’ in 2002 when Madelyn told her that her grandson was a ‘social worker’ at a time he was already a Senator. How Mrs Nordyke maintained she gave birth to twins in the same hospital at the same time Stanley Anne gave birth to obama. How Mrs Nordyke’s husband turned out to be an MD with a practise in the same street (not the same number) as the address on the ‘birth announcement’ in the two Hawaii newspapers...and the hospital referred to didn’t exist in 1961.
How’s that from memory? LOL!
Excellent memory LOL The husband was an M.D. but it wasn’t him with the office on Kalanianaole Hwy but one of the sons. Dr. Nordyke has been dead for awhile but it is quite possible the article with Mrs Ellen Nordyke was a plant to prepare people for having the original birth certificate suddenly being released only to discover that Dr. Nordyke is listed as the attending physician at Jr’s birth. There was a great deal about the article on the Nordyke twins which didn’t add up including Madelyn going on a cruise in 2002 in her 80th year and mentioning her son was a social worker when he was actually a state senator; no twin white girls in the kindergarten class photo in which Jr was present: and no Nordyke twins listed in either of the papers as being born August 5,1961.
I have also discovered that Maya often paraphrases information which she gleaned either from Jr’s book or from Jr himself. In their release upon the death of grandma both mentioned that Grandma and Grandpa had come to Hawaii in 1959 soon aftr HI was admitted to the U.S. as a state. That is information which is prominently featured in Jr’s book but having researched it, we know that the Dunhams actually moved to HI in June of 1960 after Ann graduated from Mercer Island High School. Neither Jr nor his sister are too interested in being factual when it comes to dates, which is surprising to me considering Maya is a history teacher!(little interesting tidbit I read a short time ago is that Maya mentioned how she teaches her students the importance of the Constitution) So many things which have been said by Jr have been proven to be false that I am surprised others haven’t called him on it, but then again when the presstitutes think he is the answer to all things and all people I supposed I shouldn’t express any surprise whatsoever!
That's the timeline they want/need us to believe, because it's in that time the conception and birth took place. That's when the fiction of the father appears...and the subsequent mystery of his place of birth.
I agree. I would hate to be the justice that swears this man in.
For example, Obama Maya birth, returns a list of articles. By sorting on Search Score the article I quote in reply #6 has the highest score and is Number 1 on the list.
Off topic but have you seen an image of Maya’s COLB? I’ve read it was used as the basis for the KOS image of Barack’s COLB.
The story revolving around Maya’s Certification of Live Birth being used for the basis to make the KOS image was presented by techdude who posted at Texas Darling and Atlas Shrugged. When he disappeared without presenting a final report his earlier claims were removed as they could not be proven.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.