Posted on 02/17/2009 12:57:35 AM PST by Las Vegas Dave
The FCC released its latest digital TV transition figures Monday and 421 stations will terminate their analog signals as of midnight Feb. 17. That's in addition to the 220 that have already cut their analog signals off or will today.
All told, 641 stations -- 36% of the country -- will have made the switch by the original hard date, according to the FCC data.
Congress moved the date to June 12 at the urging of the then Obama transition team. The president signed the measure into law last Wednesday.
The FCC says it has sent staffers to the 72 markets with higher analog penetration, where they expect the impact from tomorrow's shut-off to be the greatest. The FCC has also boosted its call center staffing for its DTV help line, 1-888-CALLFCC.
The commission has a new DTV reception map at http://www.dtv.gov/fixreception.html to help viewers figure out what kind of DTV reception they should be getting.
"This is not just about whether people can watch their favorite reality show," said acting FCC chairman Michael Copps. "It's about whether consumers have access to vital emergency alerts, weather, news and public affairs."
Over the weekend, the FCC identified 106 stations that had sought to pull the plug on analog Feb. 17 in markets where all the network affiliates wanted to do so. Forty three of those decided to delay, while the rest agreed to an enhanced analog nightlight. Under that set-up, at least one of the stations in the market would keep an analog signal on for another 60 days with news and public affairs, DTV transition info and, potentially, emergency information.
There were also 10 stations that identified themselves as hardship cases and needed to pull the plug on Feb. 17 in a problematic market; the FCC granted all 10 requests. The FCC also said over the weekend that it would be less strict about letting stations that had indicated they were switching Feb. 17 to change their decisions and stay on.
Even so, only a half-dozen -- mostly educational stations -- took the commission up on its offer, according to an FCC spokesperson
LVD
Note: if you search Freerepublic using the keyword "“HDTV”, you will find most of the past HDTV postings..
UPDATE-High-Def’s Next Leap
http://www.multichannel.com/article/174220-High_Def_s_Next_Leap.php?rssid=20059
Programmers Prepare For 3-D, More Pixels And “Higher-Def”
by George Winslow — Multichannel News, 2/16/2009 12:00:00 AM MT
Ready or not, the future of high-definition television is on its way.
With HDTV sets in less than half of all American homes, the format is still something of an emerging technology. But that hasn’t stopped consumer electronics manufacturers from touting next-generation HD. And competitive pressures are forcing programmers and operators to take notice.
“The beginning of the next-generation HD is already here,” said Bob Zitter, HBO executive vice president of technology and chief technology officer. “Consumers already access programming at 1080p [via Blu-ray disks, Internet downloads or home video cameras] that is better quality than [the 720p or 1080i formats] any broadcast network, cable operator, satellite provider or phone company is offering today. Over time, the television industry will have to offer content that is equivalent to what consumers can get from other sources already on the market, such as Blu-ray.”
Some even argue that these next-generation technologies offer cable, which has struggled to compete with satellite’s high-definition offerings, a way to move ahead of the competition in the next three to five years.
“Video is becoming a commodity,” said Dick Green, president and CEO of CableLabs, which is actively helping cable operators explore the potential of several newer formats, including 3-D HD. “You can get video from a lot of sources — satellite, telephone companies, over the Internet. So it is important for us to look at how the cable industry can enhance the video product and differentiate ourselves from our competitors with our video product. We want cable to be the gold standard for HD quality. These [next-generation HD formats] have the potential to do that.”
How programmers and operators tap into that potential is another matter. While everyone agrees that newer formats will take years to develop, there is no clear agreement about what formats offer the best business opportunities.
Some next-generation formats involve the delivery of stereoscopic 3-D images, something that is already being used in theaters and has the potential of being brought into the home via videogame consoles, Blu-ray disks and ultimately sports or event programming.
There are currently about 1,600 digital theaters capable of presenting 3-D films or events, up from 500 in 2007, and the number of screens is expected to hit 4,000 by the end of this year, estimates Michael Lewis, the CEO and chairman of RealD, a provider of 3-D technology to theaters.
“In the movies, 3-D is simply here,” Fox Group president of engineering Andy Setos said.
Working with partners, Fox Sports has produced National Basketball Association, National Football League and the Bowl Championship Series games in 3-D HD for audiences in theaters. “But in the home setting it is way experimental,” Setos said.
One major problem is that there are no standards for delivery of 3-D content into the home, with different types of TVs using different kinds of glasses explains CableLab’s Green.
Production costs are also high, with a 3-D HD production of an NBA game costing about six times the $50,000 needed for a normal HD production, Green said. Some broadcasters have experimented with 3-D programming but it is not currently possible to deliver true 3-D HD images over existing multichannel pipelines.
Other next-generation formats enhance image quality — either by increasing the number of pixels being displayed, which increases the resolution, or by increasing the number of frames per second, which improves the way motion is rendered in high-action sports or movie programming.
Consumer electronics manufacturers are already selling some very high-end sets priced at over $50,000 with 3840 by 2160 pixels, more than four times the screen real estate of today’s 1920x1080 pixel HD sets. At International Broadcasting Conference in Amsterdam in 2008, Japan’s NHK demonstrated an “ultra HD” system using 7680x4320 pixels.
Those technologies require such large and expensive screens, they are likely to have only limited use in the home. But over the next few years, some programmers believe they will to need to move from the 720 progressive line and 1080 interlaced HD formats they currently use to a higher quality 1080 progressive line format at 60 frames per second.
Others remain skeptical. “1080p at 60 frames per second would require retooling of the entire industry, and I don’t really see the benefits,” Setos said.
“Today it is not possible for any programmers to send 1080p content over the existing distribution chain,” added Michael Aloisi, MTV Networks vice president of distribution technology, satellite and affiliate services.
Still a number of programmers, particularly those offering sports and movies, are preparing to offer content in “higher” high-definition.
Last year, Hallmark became the first programmer to go to MPEG-4 compression for the launch of its Hallmark Movie Channel in HD, according to Jim Bennett, vice president of technical operations for Hallmark Channel and Hallmark Movie Channel. “Everyone is moving to MPEG-4 because it offers huge bandwidth savings and is much better for transport,” he said.
While Bennett is skeptical about the prospect of delivering 1080p 60 signals to operators, he said Hallmark is producing 35 originals this year in 1080p at 24 frames per second, and programmers will have to begin offering 1080p content.
“When people really start to see what Blu-ray starts to look like, they’ll be demanding higher quality, which we will be able to deliver,” he said.
Last summer, HBO also moved to MPEG-4. “We felt it was important to go to MPEG-4 when we did because 1080p at 60 [frames per second] and other qualitative improvements are going to put pressure on bandwidth in the future,” Zitter said.
ESPN is also preparing for 1080p, said Chuck Pagano, the company’s executive vice president of technology. It is building a new facility at the Staples Center in Los Angeles that will be capable of the highest quality 1080p.
“We are taking steps to get ready for the next generation,” said Pagano, who adds that the sports giant’s main facility in Bristol, Conn., still operates at 720p. “Right now, no one is asking for 1080p content to be delivered to the consumer. But we will be doing retooling efforts as we go forward to make certain we will have the highest quality available programming.”
Some of the constraints on these next-generation technologies are likely to ease in upcoming years.
Charter Communications chief technology officer Marwan Fawaz said, “Our immediate focus is on getting 1080p content on our networks,” but admits that “really creates a challenge for us in terms of bandwidth. When you look at 1080p today and compare that to the average bit rates of 1080i, it requires about two times as much bandwidth.”
But the deployment of boxes capable of handling MPEG-4 compression, the move to convert analog spectrum to digital and the deployment of switched digital video will make it much easier for operators to handle next-generation HD content.
“As you have switched digital and analog reclamation, we’ll have the flexibility to add tons of HD content as well as expand IP-based HD content,” Fawaz said.
“Cable still has the best pipe,” Green said. “We can certainly do better than Blu-ray quality because we can devote more capacity to it; and by the time we need to do that, we’ll have solved our capacity problems with more digital and less analog. That will give us a big advantage.”
I made the switch from 'Direct 157 channels and nothing on' to OTA last April. I get drops occasionally when it is windy, but, not a big deal vs $60/month of OK programming. If it wasn't for the local RTN (oldies station), I just be spending more time on FR.
All reachable stations still pumping analog this morning...just checked.
I thought they WEREN’T doing it!!!!!
Kee-ripes!!! Is there ANYTHING you can believe from government? ANY DAMN THING AT ALL???
so what’s up with the removal of channels from analog anyway? and where is all the money from selling those frequencies to whomever they were sold to?
TRANSLATION: The Obama staffers stampeded to the 72 urban markets served by their constituents in a frantic effort to keep the Obama Indoctrination Media on the air until the government could give the constituents a digital convertor. One staffer quoted "We can't have our peeps uniformed, can we?"
Yes, when they come knocking at our doors and introduce theirselves, "I'm from the government, and I am here to help..."
Believe it! < /humor >
“It’s about whether consumers have access to vital emergency alerts, weather, news and public affairs.”
You mean weather and propaganda.
You people.
Just make the switch. You will be amazed at how fast conversions are made.
You think it will be any better in June??
You are dreaming.
Kee-ripes!!! Is there ANYTHING you can believe from government? ANY DAMN THING AT ALL???
Couple of stations in OK are doing it today, they asked for permission from FCC to go ahead. Storm season was the reason the stations gave for going ahead, they think June will be tornado weather and did not want to cut people off during that, stations said by that time people will have boxes, also said you can buy a converter box now and then when your DTV coupon comes, take receipt for box and coupon to store and store will honor coupon and give you $.
It’s about whether consumers have access to vital emergency alerts, weather, news and public affairs.”-and that wonderful info bar on the lower half of the scree.
You mean weather-go outside wet(rain)sunny (fair)snow (cold)
You idiots
Just make the switch. You will be amazed at how fast conversions are made-we need the money pay or else
You think it will be any better in June??
You are dreaming.
This would important to me, but I rarely watch TV. 99 per cent (plus) of the time, when the TV is on, I’m watching DVDs (or the occasional archival tape). Stopped by the library tonight to drop off some media platters which were due, and while there, grabbed about ten more DVDs. :’)
Netflix is good for us, two/mth @ $4.99. But free at the library sounds like a much better deal.
We have several HDDVD’s that came free with the player, and standard DVD’s collecting dust that we haven’t watched...maybe on some rainy day?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.