Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NJ considers ban on bare-it-all 'Brazilian' wax
sfgate ^ | March 19, 2009 | BETH DeFALCO

Posted on 03/19/2009 8:26:46 AM PDT by JoeProBono

New Jersey is drawing the line when it comes to bikini waxing.

The state Board of Cosmetology and Hairstyling is moving toward a ban on genital waxing altogether after two women reported being injured in their quest for a smooth bikini line.

Both women were hospitalized for infections following so-called "Brazilian" bikini waxes; one of the women has filed a lawsuit, according to Jeff Lamm, a spokesman for New Jersey's Division of Consumer Affairs, which oversees the cosmetology board.

Technically, genital waxing has never been allowed — only the face, neck, abdomen, legs and arms are permitted — but because bare-it-all "Brazilians" weren't specifically banned, state regulators haven't enforced the law.

"The genital area is not part of the abdomen or legs as some might assume," Lamm said.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: bikini; newjersey; onehandbrigade; waxing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 last
To: calex59

Full frontal is cool with me.
I guess machete sales will go up.


81 posted on 03/19/2009 1:06:29 PM PDT by arealconservativeforachange (Tell JD Hayworth to run for McCain's seat! http://www.jdhayworth.com/contact.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: calex59

Agree on both counts.


82 posted on 03/19/2009 1:27:42 PM PDT by RockinRight (How do you like your Savior now, libs? Looks like Jimmy Carter is no longer the worst President...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

83 posted on 03/19/2009 1:37:37 PM PDT by P.O.E. ("Arbitrary power is most easily established on the ruins of liberty abused to licentiousness")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: linn37
Even stranger is when males do it.

I'd wager most men who do it are looking for the appearance of enhanced length.

In other words, a 30' tree surrounded by 10' bushes looks a lot shorter than a 25' tree in an open field. LOL

84 posted on 03/19/2009 1:41:37 PM PDT by BlueMondaySkipper (Involuntarily subsidizing the parasite class since 1981)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

and the gays are screaming “Keep your laws off my body!”


85 posted on 03/19/2009 1:44:17 PM PDT by BigDaddyTX (Don't Mex with Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasNative2000

They must be Union members...


86 posted on 03/19/2009 1:44:29 PM PDT by Pharmboy (Democrats lie because they must...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

To each his/her own, I suppose. I don’t need “Welcome to the Jungle” playing in my head when getting involved in certain activities, nor do I enjoy spontaneous surprise flossing. And stubble is inappropriate for anyone involved in interpersonal contact. Smooth and soft is a real good thing. No making out with Bluto, thankyouverymuch.


87 posted on 03/19/2009 7:16:33 PM PDT by Two Kids' Dad (((( Two Kids' Dad ---- (T) - CA ** Join the "T" party ** ))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono
"...resulting in infections, ingrown hairs and rashes..."

Bush's fault!
88 posted on 03/19/2009 7:17:43 PM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast (1st call: Abbas. 1st interview: Al Arabiya. 1st energy decision: halt drilling in UT. Arabs 1st!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Two Kids' Dad

A gorilla is one thing, but I was raised on the sexy women in the ‘70s Playboys. But gradually, over time, I saw them devolve from the upside down pyramids to rectangles to landing strips to Hitler moustaches to nada. I was like, “WTF ?!?” It wasn’t sexy. It was creepy and made women look like little girls. Bald ain’t beautiful and it remains a major visceral turn-off for me (just about tied with tattooes on the fairer sex). Besides, from a practical standpoint, it also serves a purpose for cutting down on infections.


89 posted on 03/19/2009 7:46:24 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Not a governmental concern.


90 posted on 03/19/2009 10:50:18 PM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson