Posted on 05/07/2009 4:34:34 PM PDT by Fred Nerks
On his first day in office, January 21, 2009, Obama signed Executive Order 13489. This order was entered into the Federal Register on January 26, 2009.
What this executive order says, is that only the Attorney General (Eric Holder) and Council to the President, (Gregory Craig) are able to review presidential records requests and determine if they can be made public or not. (See Section 3)
In other words, you aren't going to see any records or documents that Obama doesn't want you to see.
It shouldn't surprise anyone that Obama's first official act was to deny access to his records. Obama has lived for 48 years without leaving any footprints -- none! There is no Obama documentation -- no bona fides -- no paper trail -- nothing.
Original, vault copy birth certificate -- Not released
Certificate of Live Birth -- Released -- Counterfeit Obama/Dunham marriage license -- Not released
Obama/Dunham divorce -- Released (by independent investigators)
Soetoro/Dunham marriage license -- Not released
Soetoro adoption records -- Not released
Soetoro/Dunham divorce -- Released (by independent investigators)
Fransiskus Assisi School School application -- Released (by independent investigators)
Punahou School records -- Not released
Selective Service Registration -- Released -- Counterfeit
Occidental College records -- Not released
Passport -- Not released and records scrubbed clean by Obama's terrorism and intelligence adviser.
Columbia College records -- Not released Columbia thesis -- Not released
Harvard College records -- Not released
Harvard Law Review articles -- None
Baptism certificate -- None
Medical records -- Not released
Illinois State Senate records -- None
Illinois State Senate schedule -- Lost
Law practice client list -- Not released
University of Chicago scholarly articles -- None
Go ahead, tell me that this is just a coincidence
That story is a fallacy, the COLB was NEVER sealed by HI’s Governor!
I believe you’re right. When you say the marxists are the enablers do you also include the democrats? Because it seems they’ve been inching up to this since FDR.
.
Now Obama is being pressured by his gay base
The composition of the three of them always looked strange to me, the way Stanley Armour's hand is floating above zero's shoulder in particular...there are many items in that image that just do not look natural, and why would the line of shoulders and arms of Madelyn and zero be in line...unless zero was posed that way, to be added later and create a snug fit. I wasn't the only one, I came across a blog (forgot which) where someone else made a similar observation.
PhilDragoo, whose FReepername appears on the image I believe to be the actual image taken on that day, helpfully removed zero from the compostion, and presto! There you have it. Both are 'fakes' - but can you tell which may have been the original?
WHO IS THE MAN WHO WAS NEVER THERE AT ALL.
Actually careful reading of the linked wording shows that it also refers to what may or may not be placed in each Presidential library. From another source it has become apparent that Pres__dent Jr could not even apply for medicaid if he fell upon hard times because he does NOT have the necessary documentation! That info can be found here which is actually for the state of ID but is uniform across the nation!
The second one, because:
1. If the feet of the subjects had not been removed in the first picture it would be an obvious fake - the two supports of the bench would be too close together.
2. If the first picture was the original, it would be extremely difficult to reconstruct the feet of the subjects in the second picture.
3. The photoshopped-in parts of Stanley's jacket and the grandmother's dress are lame.
4. We wouldn't even have a picture of the grandparents sitting on a bench in Central Park unless they had come there at the right time to visit their grandson.
Well,,,It’s makin’ me sick Fo’Sho!!!
I think of all the MEN that died ,face down in the mud,to
Defend this country!!!
Does anybody have to wonder why they want to take away
our GUNS!?!?!?!
Horton Hatches A WHO?
They are not to leak his "records.." But this won't stop the spooks. Leaks are sure to come.
I don't knw how many times I have written this but one more: FASCIST MARKER
I’ve done right much photoshop work myself, and tried compositing. It is not easy, and interestingly, it seems tell-tale indicators become more apparent when he image is saved down to a coarser resolution.
Especially with Jpgs: it’s hard to beat the artifacts caused by that kind of compression.
This thing is an amazing study of fakery, on many levels:
Propaganda, theme: When did this thing emerge? What is it trying to say?
Gesture and drama: Some grandson, huh? Posing for a family memory but not embracing?
Anatomy: Has he broken that poor woman’s ribs? And yes, and that disembodied hand hovering over the shoulder; UFO?
Light,shade: no matter how you try it never stands up. Michelangelo couldn’t pull it off. There’s something just wrong about the whole “gestalt” of the thing, not so obvious in the details.
Elements of the composite: The scarf is there to cover something. Note the bright pixels along the border. That’s “clipping,” typically occurring when you bump the contrast or intensity of a color too far. It doesn’t appear any where else on the image.
Sources: the pic is supposed to be in Central Park. There are pictures of Obama from his time at Columbia dressed in a similar jacket. Were gramps and gram in NYC in that time?
Why fake a pic with the grandparents? Is there no authentic picture expressing this theme?
It could be the work of an adoration by a nitwit with too much time on his hands. And for what it is, it ain’t too bad.
But if this thing is official ‘bamster propaganda, traceable as an sanctioned campaign image, a study of it could fill a book. (Too bad Roland Barthe’s not around.)
Of course, in the end we’d all be left wondering: Is there really an Obama?
Yes!
It's Chauncy the Gardner!
Marx said: "History repeats itself, first as tragedy, then as farce." Something else he got ass-backwards.
Should have acknowledged your comment earlier, but jumped the gun.
LOL! I love the way you think...as for myself, as I wasn't there when the photograph was taken, I have no way of knowing it was taken in Central Park.
Yep. Present and a666ounted for.
“THE BIGGER THE SMILE, THE SHARPER THE KNIFE!”(Ferengi Rule of Acquisition #48)
STE=Q
That image has been around for so long...I have no idea of it's source, or who provided it originally. I also considered it as a possible 'prank' - until I saw this:
Appears to have been taken on the same day as the 'person in the middle' - wearing the same clothes...HE may have been in Central Park, BUT WERE THEY?
By any means necessary...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.