Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin is On the Move, Support HER!!
Free Republic ^ | 5/11/09 | Candor7

Posted on 05/11/2009 12:59:40 AM PDT by Candor7

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-168 next last
To: Virginia Ridgerunner
So why are you advocating the banning of people from this site because they dont agree with you?

This isnt Russia for goodness sake.

Not to mention there is a life time before any candidate is chosen, and Palin may not even put her family through it.

41 posted on 05/11/2009 3:27:27 AM PDT by DainBramage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Candor7
The continuous campaign to dis-empower Palin through bogus ethics complaints, baseless negative commentary in the media , much of it of a personal nature, is a horrible exercise in the self destruction of a nation. When Palin is attacked, every ordinary , hard working , patriotic American is attacked. And we should take that attack on each of us as being VERY personal...

MAKE NO MISTAKE, ANY ATTACK ON SARAH PALIN IS AN ATTACK ON US! THE LEFT IS TERRIFIED OF HER.

42 posted on 05/11/2009 3:33:23 AM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
Well, considering that my walk IS Conservative and fully in accord with the mission of Free Republic, what does THAT say about everyone else, as you suggest?

I am not normally at odds with you VR, but I will not be supporting Sarah Palin. I will be against her.

If she wins the Republican nomination, I will continue to be against her. I support Reagan Conservatives only, and she does not measure up.

I share your vehemence against RINOs, but that does not give you (Palinites) carta blanche ownership of the forum. There are many of us who believe that Palin is not Conservative enough.

43 posted on 05/11/2009 3:46:13 AM PDT by roamer_1 (It takes a (Kenyan) village to raise an idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
You wrote:

And people may view Palin as unelectable because they have weighed the evidence so far and come to that conclusion.

And all I am doing is pointing out to you that others will speak for themselves when they have done so, and you can only speak for yourself.

So, pony up with the evidence you have weighed. I'm all ears.

44 posted on 05/11/2009 3:47:44 AM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: flowerplough
...mine is the way she was trying to finesse her brat’s forthcoming brat...

and that's a disgusting, filthy thing to say.

45 posted on 05/11/2009 3:51:56 AM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl; Virginia Ridgerunner
Post 16 - Fair enough.
VA Ridgerunner, of course I'm on your side regarding Sarah Palin but some do have doubts about the grand lady and need accurate information rather than being berated.
cajungirl's post is reasonable, she didn't malign or slander SP (as some here do)
Now it's only my opinion but with folks like cajungirl we should confidently promote Palin and hope we add yet another to the millions who now support Sarah Palin.
A good initial question might be, "cajungirl, what exactly are those issues that compel you to doubt the abilities of Palin to lead and be victorious in a national campaign?"
46 posted on 05/11/2009 3:54:52 AM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: roamer_1

The typical “conservative spoiler” voter, I see. Not just hoping that the FR early favorite develops, but already condemning over 3 years out. For all the good that does you might as well be a DU plant.


47 posted on 05/11/2009 3:56:18 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Beat a better path, and the world will build a mousetrap at your door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: roamer_1

Name some people you would support.


48 posted on 05/11/2009 4:01:13 AM PDT by LeavingNewYork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks
No ones saying shes not a good candidate, just handicapped fromt he get go.

(just a few points)

The baby daddy will be a Jerry Springer regular, with and without his mom.

Tina Fey will be the headline of SNL portraying her as a ditz with a trailer trash family and the replay will be on GMA every morning.

Every fake scandal created in the for previous years will come out as new and it will all start again.

Plus Im not even sure shes bright enough for the interviews. Unless she has studied up on current affairs she most likely will stumble during an interview, then the one with Katy Couric will be replayed over and over.

Bottom Line

Because of Acorn voter fraud we will need every single vote we can get to defeat OBama..and then only with a huge turnout, and then only if a third Libertarian lite party hasnt started up. Millions of Americans arent as informed as we are here and will see her as the media portrays her and will rethink thier vote.

Im betting Sarah herself is weighing this same scenario and deciding if its worth it to put her family through the grinder for the campaign and then the same thing for 4 years of office.

Its not fair..its not right..but it is what it is, the reality of the situation.

49 posted on 05/11/2009 4:06:58 AM PDT by DainBramage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Tempest

I voted for her in ‘08 (not McCain) and would support her again.


50 posted on 05/11/2009 4:21:51 AM PDT by brwnsuga (Proud, BLACK, Beautiful, Conservative!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DainBramage
Im betting Sarah herself is weighing this same scenario and deciding if its worth it to put her family through the grinder for the campaign and then the same thing for 4 years of office.

Honestly, if Sarah were to ask me, (not gunna happen) I would have to say to her, don't do it. Enjoy your life, take care of your family. However...the fact that the Left is so scared of her that they feel they need to destroy her, tells me something; they believe there is a good chance that she will run.

I am an Australian. Our State Broadcasting Service (SBS) denigrates Sarah Palin at every opportunity, just as they did and still denigrate GWB. That's got to be purely to influence the one hundred thousand or so American expats who live here.

We shall see. I look on the bright side. The Left may have exhausted their muckraking opportunities by the time the next campaign begins.

51 posted on 05/11/2009 4:24:30 AM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
The typical “conservative spoiler” voter, I see. Not just hoping that the FR early favorite develops, but already condemning over 3 years out. For all the good that does you might as well be a DU plant.

I will happily support any candidate who embraces the principles of all three pillars of Conservatism. That is what a "Conservative" candidate IS. Candidates who are not able to embrace all three pillars of Conservatism invariably cause infighting and factionalism, and should not be supported.

Palin is a moderate populist who leans conservative (a lot like Thompson), but is not a Conservative.

Oddly enough, it is those who follow the populists and pragmatists who do Conservatives harm, not those such as I, as you accuse.

52 posted on 05/11/2009 4:32:43 AM PDT by roamer_1 (It takes a (Kenyan) village to raise an idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: LeavingNewYork
Name some people you would support.

There are none that I am aware of that are seeking election.

Until someone throws their hat in the ring, I will not do the hard work of substantiating their position on the record (votes, quotes). If I were to lend my support to anyone currently, it would be without benefit of that hard work, and basically of no value. I am very aware of Palin, however, by virtue of my research during the McCain/Palin campaign.

In the last election I supported Hunter in the primaries, with a nod to Tancredo and Keyes, and supported Keyes after Hunter stepped down. That should give you an idea where I stand.

53 posted on 05/11/2009 4:46:55 AM PDT by roamer_1 (It takes a (Kenyan) village to raise an idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Abbeville Conservative; sleepwalker; Roses0508; feedback doctor; LibLieSlayer; ...

Palin PING! Anyone on or off the Palin ping, write me.

(Will add the most recent sign-ups for the Ping soon... we are approaching 160.)

54 posted on 05/11/2009 4:55:35 AM PDT by SolidWood (Palin: "We do not want to become slaves of Washington.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carcraft

Sarah learned a lot being the VP nominee. She is street smart and a lot more street smart after the campaign. This is why she is such a big threat. She kept McCain in the game and the Left knows she is a big time threat to Obama.


55 posted on 05/11/2009 5:02:36 AM PDT by truthandlife ("Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God." (Ps 20:7))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner; cajungirl

I have to agree that you are way out of line calling for a Palin or leave FR position.

You owe a lot of people, even Palin supporters, an apology.


56 posted on 05/11/2009 5:27:07 AM PDT by Eagle Eye (Defending RINOs is the same as defending Liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
Any negative talk about Sarah should be BANNED from this site

Kiss off.

Although I can't find anything about her that I don't like I find your attitude to be quite anti-American.

57 posted on 05/11/2009 5:32:10 AM PDT by Eagle Eye (Defending RINOs is the same as defending Liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

ping for GREAT PHOTO...thanks


58 posted on 05/11/2009 5:35:29 AM PDT by mick (Central Banker Capitalism is NOT Free Enterprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye
The only people I'm calling on to leave FR are the angry, disgruntled Romneyites who have been posting their personal attacks and nasty comments about Sarah Palin and her family, rather than pointing out (specifically) what parts of her record they take issue with.

On this thread alone, one poster called Bristol Palin and her son brats. And there are plenty of similar ad hominem attacks on the Bennett thread (which I already posted) and on this thread.

As far as my active support for Palin goes, until someone shows me a candidate who is MORE Conservative than her and who can also command the same crowds she can, I'm with her 100%, unlike a lot of other supposedly Conservative folks on this Conservative forum.

I have nothing against Jindal and have no opinion about Sanford, but if you can suggest a better candidate than Palin, then please feel free to do so. RINOs are not welcome.

No apology will be forthcoming. I stand my ground.

59 posted on 05/11/2009 5:47:54 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: roamer_1
Palin is a moderate populist who leans conservative (a lot like Thompson), but is not a Conservative.

Roamer, you're right in that we rarely disagree and you have my respect and FRiendship. However, can you please back up this statement and tell me why you think she's not Conservative? Her record as governor of Alaska suggests otherwise...how is her record NOT Conservative?

60 posted on 05/11/2009 5:50:43 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-168 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson