Posted on 05/29/2009 1:55:19 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
According to the promo for the current issue of Globe magazine (supermarket tabloid):
First Lady Michelle Obama is spearheading a shocking White House cover-up, insiders say in a blockbuster GLOBE world exclusive. Sources detail the cunning tactics furious Michelle is using to muzzle the man who claims to have had gay sex and cocaine encounters with the President as she battles to protect her husband's image. It's must reading for every American!
What is going on is beyond tragic.
Obama KNOWS what he is doing.
he's no citizen. He HATES America. The America he grew up seeing in Indonesia is the WEALTHY AMERICA that was a BULLY on the military stage. The America he saw was one that NEVER gave enough of its WEALTH to them. The America he saw PUNISHED evil people that he RELATES to.
Meanwhile the DUMP SHEEPLE think there is something in it for them. He pumps up CLASS ENVY, bad mouths capitalism, and divides people by race. He HATES whites. Obama is EVIL.
it is racist. Conservatism believes in a colorblind society not going around calling people mullato as if it where an epithet like coke snorter etc.
Larry Sinclair was jailed by Sen Biden’s son, the AG of Delaware during the Presidential Campaigning. Two days after Biden was picked as VP, all charges were dropped.
Obambi is a closet homosexual cocaine freak, who did Larry and Cocaine in the back of a limo in 1999......
http://larrysinclair-0926.blogspot.com/
in the closet
Does the Lincoln bedroom have a big closet for obambi?
Hell he probably has a private closet on da plane too.
O God, I could cry!
“Judging from the age of the Obama girls my first inclination is to discount this rumor.’
Well, if you don’t mind I would like know who the milk man was.
Well the Enquirer broke Edwards love child story.
Look at it this way - this guy is very powerful and vindictive. My guess is the Globe has something more because it is a suicide mission to run this story unless they have something.
Thanks for the ping.
I would really like to know the denomination of the church that allowed him to be an usher.
Thanks for the ping!
It could also be Neanderthal..
Basically, you referred to another poster as racist....uh tres harsh don’t you think? It is truly one of the most incendiary accusations that can be made at someone—I was well, shocked.
My Response/Questions to you were:
Why is it racist to point out someone’s race?
Are the media not all over the fact that Sotomayer is Hispanic?
Why is it racist to refer to someone as mulatto?
Tho I agree that his race/color don’t matter in many issues, but I don’t think it is racist to refer to someone by race.
I am not sure if you are opposed to pointing out someone’s race or referring to someone as Mullato, or both?
In your opinion “it is racist” , however, see legal dictionary def. http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Mullato. This term is in a legal dictionary, so it is not considered derogatory by all. So is it derogatory? Is it if you refer to someone as Eurasian, is that derogatory? How about Black? Creole?
2. You state that conservatism is colorblind, therefore to refer to someone’s race is racist. That really is not supporting why it is racist to call someone Mullato—it is just your opinion.
You then go on to state that “Conservatism believes in a colorblind society not going around calling people mullato as if it where an epithet like coke snorter** etc.” I think that was reading a lot into the term Mullato. I have never seen any of this as a conservative platform....I am not saying I disagree, but you are stating as fact what is really your opinion—unless you can find a conservative platform with that tenet.
I grew up in the 70s when we were taught to be colorblind—but the libs, the election of the past year, and the appointment of Sotomayer have been anything but colorblind. I mean come on, no one could ask tough questions or criticize the candidate for fear of being referred to as a racist. No one could point out that the occupant attended a racist’s church...Seems we have the same thing going on with Sotomayer. No, we should be colorblind on matter of most issues which I think I said in my first post, but I am really tired of the political thot-police dredging up the term to short-circuit debate. I think conservatives need to be very careful not to fall into that.
You branded as racist the person who referred to Obama as a Mullato & really did not answer my questions— The libs and rinos are branding those who would question the nomination of Sotomayer as racist. So it is ok to label Sotomayer as the first Hispanic to SCOTUS, but Rush is a racist to question her qualifications or her possibly racist legal opinions? Hmm double standard. So it is ok for media to refer to Sotomayer as Hispanic but not the occupant as Mullato? Sorry, I don’t get it...
3. But frankly this seems like a form of post-election conservative political correctness which I am getting really tired of.
We have freedom of speech and freedom of thot (at least for the time being) and I don’t think it is appropriate to label anyone as racist on this forum for a comment like that.
**BTW, didn’t he say he was a coke snorter in his OWN BOOK?!!
We agree to disagree.
“Thou hast said it..”
Push your palms out, roll your eyes--and put your tongue in cheek.
I was wondering about that during Bush’s last 6 months in office, it was like he disappeared completely from public view and if we did see him, he looked haggard and disheveled.
Only his white half is homosexual.
I remember this actor appearing on Temperature’s Rising, an old comedy show from 1971 to ‘73. In this episode he played a character who was in fact gay and in fact told one character...”come on are you saying I’m a fag? Yes I am,”
I remember the episode generated not too little controversey as this was the first time homosexuality had been openly explored in such a bold way on a comedy show shown in the roughly 8;30pm 9 o’clock time frame!
You know Obama triangulates the same as all the other politicians do. This might be a way of wink wink nod nod burnishing his bona fides with homosexuals.
OMG, I just read the “Pop” poem. You’re absolutely right that it screams sexual abuse! I’m astounded that he allowed it to be seen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.