It's Official! Hawaii never issued Obama's 2007 Certification of Live Birth

The Greater Evil ^ | 07/14/2009 | Polarik

[MHGinTN]

Nominees are confrimed by the Senate, so the answer is no, whomever is nominated is a responsibility of the Senate.

[mojitojoe]

Where is that statement from his attorney because if that is the case, they are admitting that the one they presented is a fraud.
_____________
“His attorney’s stated that he doesn’t want to show it because it would be embarrassing. “It was posted on here somewhere. It was his attorney’s reply to one of the court cases. Anyone know which post that was on or have that information?

[Repealthe17thAmendment]

It just seems odd that Obama could not get cleared to play in a Little League game with that COLB, but he can be elected POTUS.

Of course, maybe that's why he never played baseball as a kid. he couldn't provide a proper birth certificate!

[mojitojoe]

The fix is in. That is very convenient isn’t it?

[mojitojoe]

Coincidence? Not hardly. Everything they do is calculated and planned. All one has to do is look at Axelrods photos. He would do anything to help his boy. Creepy, very creepy:

[null and void]

Obama's Birth Certificate a "serious embarrassment" Source?

[Fred Nerks]

I’m trying to track down the source of that statement:

“...The Obama team contented itself with a motion to dismiss the case and a protective order, but there has yet to be a ruling on this, perhaps to the surprise and chagrin of Obama and the DNC. Obama’s lawyers in these motions, argued that revealing the information (birth certificate, citizenship in other countries, etc.) would “cause a defined and serious injury” to Obama and/or the DNC. They say revealing these documents raises a “legitimate privacy concern” and the above mentioned risk that “particularly serious embarrassment will result from turning over the requested documentation.” The source of that embarrassment was not specified...

http://israelinsider.ning.com/profiles/blogs/2018399:BlogPost:10858

Looks like it originated with Berg.

[Fred Nerks]

Heresay, until we find Berg’s original statement:

“During the Berg lawsuit to force the release of Obama’s longform, “vault” birth certificate, his lawyers argued that revealing the information (birth cert, citizenship in other countries, etc.) would “cause a defined and serious injury” to Obama and/or the DNC. They argued that revealing these documents raises a “legitimate privacy concern” and the above mentioned risk that “particularly serious embarrassment will result from turning over the requested documentation.” The source of that embarrassment was not specified; but it is clear he is hiding something he doesn’t want the country to know.”

http://opengov.ideascale.com/akira/dtd/4845-4049

[mojitojoe]

THANK YOU!!!! I saved the entire page as a screen shot. I knew I saw it somewhere a while back, but couldn’t find it.

[Fred Nerks]

here’s a clue...use Google...I looked for ‘berg birth certificate embarrassment’

now go to Berg’s website and see if you can find it there.

http://www.obamacrimes.info/

posting unsourced material will always come back to haunt you, provide links!

[mojitojoe]

I still was unable to find it. I found the discussion here. I I wanted to see the actual court papers that I assume only Berg has.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2112521/posts?page=57

[mojitojoe]

http://www.tsrn.us/blog/2009/03/08/obamas-eligibilty-problems-wont-go-away-and-hes-determined-to-drag-the-entire-country-down-with-him/

http://justgetthere.us/blog/archives/Why-Wont-Obama-Respond-to-Citizenship-Charges-In-Federal-Court-Case.html

http://israelinsider.ning.com/profiles/blogs/2018399:BlogPost:10858

http://usurpador.blogcindario.com/2009/03/00051-obama-s-eligibilty-problems-won-t-go-away.html

http://www.jonchristianryter.com/RyterReport/headlines.html

http://puma-facts.com/Berg.aspx

http://colorado.indymedia.org/node/1328

http://usjf.net/archives/1211

http://www.thecommentary.net/page/5/

http://www.sodahead.com/blog/19988/berg-reponse-in-opposition-to-obamadnc-protective-order/

http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?page_id=2104

[Fred Nerks]

I have no doubt in my mind that Berg made the statement, it’s been written about on so many websites...but it’s heresay unless we can find where it comes from his own mouth...IIRC he said this during an interview, it was supposedly something said to him verbally and not put into writing.

I believe it. But how to prove? How to find who said it to him? And even then...it’s heresay.

Btw, embarrassing is an understatement.

[FourtySeven]

I don’t know if this has been asked already in this thread, but have you sent this to Les Kinsolving? He’s apparently the only one in any media outlet asking these questions, and he may find this interesting.

Also, you can call into his nightly show that runs on 680 WCBM from 9-11 PM (EDT) every weeknight. It’s “uninhibited radio” (as Kinsolving claims) so that means they don’t screen the calls. I tend to believe they don’t, given some of the nuts that call in from time to time. I believe the number is here: http://leskinsolving.com/contact.html

Some places on the site says his show is 8-10, but this is wrong. It’s 9-11.

[Fred Nerks]

I’m still trying to make head/tail of it:

“Barack Obama and the DNC failed to respond to Berg’s filing of Sep. 15 within the required 30 days, which means they ADMITTED to all the charges in the filing by default. When they did not respond in any manner to any of the requests for information or documention the judge extended their deadline, and they then filed a motion for DISMISSAL and for a PROTECTIVE ORDER.

Their reasoning for requesting a protective order is that revealing the information (birth certificate, passports, citizenship in other countries) would “cause a defined and serious injury” to Obama and/or the DNC. They say revealing these documents raises a “legitimate privacy concern” and the above mentioned risk that “particularly serious embarrassment will result from turning over the requested documentation.” (emphasis added) Then they claim Berg has no standing to ask for it.”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2112521/posts?page=57

Seems clear enough on the surface, I guess it’s the PROTECTIVE ORDER we need to see.

[mojitojoe]

I believe it. But how to prove? How to find who said it to him? And even then...it’s heresay.
______________
I have to agree. There are enough real facts that we don’t need to give the opposition fodder. That said, I believe it too, but unless I see it in a response from the court, I will net cite it again.

[mojitojoe]

I guess it’s the PROTECTIVE ORDER we need to see.
____________
YES!!!!!!!!!!!! We do. Any chance we see it?

[Fred Nerks]

see what you can find here:

http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-paedce/case_no-2:2008cv04083/case_id-281573/

[Fred Nerks]

I think it’s this one:

October 6, 2008 15 MOTION for Protective Order Staying Discovery Pending Decision on Dispositive Motion filed by BARACK OBAMA, THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE.Brief, Certification, Certificate of Service. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(LAVELLE, JOHN)

[mojitojoe]

http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/pennsylvania/paedce/2:2008cv04083/281573/15/

Is this it?