Posted on 09/10/2009 5:06:12 PM PDT by GoreNoMore
NYC CAN Breaking News Bulletin - FORWARD WIDELY September 10, 2009
New York – In a last minute decision, lawyers for the City of New York have conceded that the New York City Coalition for Accountability Now (NYC CAN), a group comprising 9/11 family members, first responders and survivors, indeed did submit over 30,000 valid signatures to put the referendum for a new 9/11 investigation before the voters of New York City this November.
In an earlier letter from the City Clerk dated July 24, 2009, the City had claimed only 26,003 signatures were valid, 3,997 short of the requisite 30,000. The City’s concession that over 30,000 of the 52,000 signatures submitted were in fact valid paves the way for lawyers from both sides to argue the legality of petition.
Asked whether he thought NYC CAN could overcome the City’s challenge to the legality of the petition, legal counsel to the petitioners, Dennis McMahon, said, “Absolutely. Although the City has an incredibly successful record of shooting down ballot initiatives, we will be arguing from a fresh perspective that reflects the unprecedented events of 9/11. We believe the courts will see how critical an issue this is, and be persuaded with our legal reasoning and point of view.” A final determination on the legality of the petition will be reached in time for the referendum to be included on the November ballot should the petitioners prevail.
Representatives for NYC CAN, 9/11 family member Manny Badillo and Executive Director Ted Walter, arrived at the Board of Elections on the morning of Wednesday, September 9, to assist the court-appointed referee in commencing a line-by-line review of the disputed signatures, only to learn the referee’s review had been called off due to a last minute concession by the City. Mr. Badillo immediately got on the phone to inform others of the news.
“The City conceded we have 30,000 valid signatures. Big victory.”
The City’s concession comes as a result of the immense effort put forth by 50+ volunteers who gave more than 1,000 hours over a two week period from August 10 to August 25 to identify a total of 7,166 signatures that were wrongly invalidated by the NYC City Clerk and Board of Elections. On August 27, NYC CAN filed the 631-page Bill of Particulars cataloguing each of the 7,166 signatures it contended were in fact valid. NYC CAN submitted another 28,000 signatures on September 4 to guarantee the referendum will go on the ballot if they win the court case, bringing the total signatures submitted to 80,000.
631-page Bill of Particulars Filed on August 27 NYC CAN must deliver its memorandum of law in response to the City’s motion for summary judgment by Monday, September 21. The City will be given an opportunity to reply before the referee’s decision is made on Monday September 28. Fast-track appeals will likely follow no matter who wins. A final decision will have to be made by September 30.
If the referendum passes in November, it would lead to the creation of a local, independent commission with subpoena power that would be tasked with comprehensively reinvestigating the attacks.
www.NYCCAN.org
Thinkers think and talkers talk. Patriots ACT.
Oh yea, that video by Sheen is outstanding.
he’s probably consuming too much of that meth his brother was selling
And everyone thought Jake was the “half a man” on “Two and a Half Men”.
Meth or no meth, the truth of the situation is that there are still valid questions about 911 that have not been answered.
What questions?
Such as?
What a complete imbecile....
The truth is, you are a fool.
As someone once said, "Show me the most beautiful woman in the world and I'll show you a guy who's tired of ****ing her."
That and Denise RIchards is widely known in Hollywood to be, well, "difficult" is probably a good word. Bat sh** crazy is another.
There’s not enough tin foil in the world for Sheen!
Watch the video and in 6 minutes you will witness what questions are around. News footage video and county officers inteviews identify the questions.
Questions like, what did Sandy Berger really have in his possession? I’d REALLY like the answer to that.
What do you say are the questions?
I watched the first minute or so and it was nothing that I have not seen off and on for these last years.
But again, what do you think are the questions?
Ya gotta change the bong water every now and then Chuck
wow sheen is one heck of a koo-koo! maybe he and Van Jones can work up a script for a new sitcom...
My niece treasures a picture of herself and Martin Sheen. Oh well. She saves the turtles.
seriously??? what a bafoon
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.