Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BuckeyeTexan; unspun

So how come you are always denigrating Orly? It appears you don’t want her to succeed.


17 posted on 09/16/2009 6:33:15 PM PDT by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: LucyT

Orly is not above being criticized here. There are no sacred cows. As for this instance, it just sounds like Sinclair and Orly are having a purse fight.


18 posted on 09/16/2009 6:35:41 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: LucyT; unspun
I resent that accusation. Take me off your ping list. I'm tired of being attacked for bringing some sense of reason and logic to these threads.

I have strongly supported the eligibility cases from the beginning and have never wavered in that support.

I do not always denigrate Orly Taitz. I criticize her when she does things that cost us credibility, which she does frequently. When the court dismisses her current case, she'll be sanctioned for wasting the court's time due to the way she's mishandled this case procedurally. And that will put an end to any reputable lawyer's chances of getting this issue into court. She will have single-handedly ruined every chance we had to succeed.

She acts unprofessionally in court. She doesn't follow the basic rules of civil procedure. She tries to handle too many cases at the same time and ends up doing a piss-poor job on all of the cases. She's a laughing stock in the legal community. I know that because my mother is a court reporter for a federal judge in Dallas and has been for 30+ years. Do you know that the U.S. attorneys in Dallas (and other districts) have a gambling pool for the next district in which Orly will file an eligibility suit and the length of time it will take for the judge to dismiss her case. She's a pathetic joke.

She begged and begged for help from other attorneys and when they offered their help free of charge, she turned them away. This is all about the glory for her. She's an attention whore. She wants to be there first no matter what it costs the rest of us.

She has made herself the face of the birther movement and in so doing has destroyed nearly every shred of credibility that many of us worked so hard for months to achieve. She poorly represents (and often misrepresents) the core facts of the eligibility issue on television and radio.

She repeatedly misrepresents conversations that took place in meetings with judges. She nearly always makes some wild prediction, just like the other day, that she's achieved a victory and will soon have access to Obama's records. She's either grossly incompetent and neglegent or she's doing these things intentionally to destroy our chances.

This last revelation that she asked Larry Sinclair to lie under oath in a court of law is the last straw. I hope she's disbarred so the plaintiffs on her cases can find an attorney who will put them and our country first.

21 posted on 09/16/2009 8:06:29 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Character, Leadership, and Loyalty matter - Be an example, no matter the cost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: LucyT

Maybe he shares bed with N-S???


41 posted on 09/17/2009 8:19:43 AM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson