Skip to comments.
Star Trek Sequel May Contain Pointed Modern Commentary
/Film ^
| September 15, 2009
| Russ Fischer
Posted on 09/16/2009 3:26:44 PM PDT by EveningStar
OK, so JJ Abrams, Roberto Orci, Alex Kurtzman and a talented cast (to whom, if things are really fair, a lot of the credit must be given) successfully rebooted Star Trek. Obviously there will be another film, and if nearly thirty years of films in the franchise have taught us anything, it is that making a crappy Trek film is all too easy. So what next for the series? More Shakespeare? Or something else? Based on recent comments, it sounds like Star Trek 2 (or whatever it will be called) could get all sorts of modern, at least from a thematic standpoint...
(Excerpt) Read more at slashfilm.com ...
TOPICS: TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: commentary; moviereview; scifi; startrek
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-53 next last
I guess it depends on what commentary is made. We'll have to wait and see.
To: Borges; KevinDavis
To: EveningStar
Just when we thought the Trekies would die out a new generation is born.
3
posted on
09/16/2009 3:28:52 PM PDT
by
Always Right
(Equal Opportunity Hater....)
To: EveningStar
“pointed modern commentary” is codeword for an unwatchable megaexpensive awful piece of pedantic dreck.
4
posted on
09/16/2009 3:30:01 PM PDT
by
bvw
To: EveningStar
The Federation of Planets elects its first *Romulan* president and Kirk and the crew of the Enterprise are sent on an expedition to locate his birth certificate.
5
posted on
09/16/2009 3:30:14 PM PDT
by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
To: EveningStar
On one of the movie sites I frequent, someone suggested that the plotline involve the Vulcans, who had their planet blown up in the last movie, be repatriated in the Romulan empire with a new homeland, and deal with the conflict that might follow.
The subject could be a kind of Vulcan Zionism and the ups and downs that happen with it.
Not a bad idea if you ask me.
6
posted on
09/16/2009 3:30:30 PM PDT
by
GunRunner
To: EveningStar
7
posted on
09/16/2009 3:31:34 PM PDT
by
al baby
(Hi Mom ;))
To: Joe 6-pack
8
posted on
09/16/2009 3:32:28 PM PDT
by
al baby
(Hi Mom ;))
To: EveningStar
A future ACORN dealing in Green Slave Women?
9
posted on
09/16/2009 3:32:33 PM PDT
by
Dallas59
To: EveningStar
Will Galactic Emperor Chimpy McBushitler be blamed for the invasion of the “peaceful” planet Islamastan?
10
posted on
09/16/2009 3:32:34 PM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(I will raise $1 million for Sarah Palin if she runs; What will you do?)
To: EveningStar
At this point I’d much rather see more Star Trek: Enterprise. The theme song was great too.
Seen enough Shatner and Kirk to last a lifetime.
11
posted on
09/16/2009 3:33:00 PM PDT
by
K-oneTexas
(I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
To: EveningStar
I think the new BSG got pretty darned pretentious around the point of New Caprica to the end.
To: EveningStar
Wasn’t it the liberal social commentary that did in Star Trek to begin with? I really hope they don’t go down that path again.
To: EveningStar
Gene Roddenberry and Gene Coon were quite adept at allegory but today’s hacks lack the capacity for nuance.
This is why they excel at comic book adaptions but fail utterly at ‘serious’ fare because they can’t make their point without hitting the audience over the head.
To: GunRunner
Fascinating...
Especially since Vulcans and Romulans are supposed to be ethnic cousins so to speak. Maybe Sarah Palin could get the role of Romulan Queen...
Live long and prosper, GunRunner.
15
posted on
09/16/2009 3:34:43 PM PDT
by
DTogo
(High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
To: al baby
16
posted on
09/16/2009 3:34:43 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
To: GunRunner
To: EveningStar
If they handle social issues the way the original series did, it could work. But I’m not sure I want a young Captain Kirk lecturing aliens on the meaning of war, humanity, or any other issue.
To: EveningStar
The Federation economy collapses when they realize that no one will actually do any work if they have free access to holodecks.
The Ferengi Reserve Board replace gold pressed latinum with a copper and nickel alloy and freely printed Latinum Certificates which they say are just as good.
19
posted on
09/16/2009 3:36:55 PM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
("I can run wild for six months ...after that, I have no expectation of success" - Admiral Obama-moto)
To: bvw
pointed modern commentary is codeword for an unwatchable megaexpensive awful piece of pedantic dreck. Could be, I hope not....this new reboot Abrams did in May, was the best ST movie since Wrath of Kahn...I cant wait for the blue ray to come out in November.
20
posted on
09/16/2009 3:37:02 PM PDT
by
Vaquero
("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
To: GunRunner
someone suggested that the plotline involve the Vulcans, who had their planet blown up in the last movieSince the DVD is not out yet, is it too late for me to whine "Spoiler Alert!"?
To: EveningStar
Well, I liked this latest version of Star Trek. I’ll get the DVD.
Could have been better, could have been a lot worse.
I think the only two I really didn’t like were the V-ger and Nemisis ones.
22
posted on
09/16/2009 3:38:10 PM PDT
by
PeteB570
(NRA - Life member and Black Rifle owner)
To: K-oneTexas
Entgerprise was my favorite series....gotta love it.
but the last movie was friggin’ great.....
23
posted on
09/16/2009 3:39:58 PM PDT
by
Vaquero
("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
To: the anti-liberal
Wasnt it the liberal social commentary that did in Star Trek to begin with?What would make you say that?
24
posted on
09/16/2009 3:40:08 PM PDT
by
Fresh Wind
("Prosperity is just around the corner." Herbert Hoover, 1932)
To: EveningStar
I guess it depends on what commentary is made. We'll have to wait and see.I'd love to see Spock do a "mind-meld" with John Galt.
25
posted on
09/16/2009 3:40:26 PM PDT
by
Night Hides Not
(If Dick Cheney = Darth Vader, then Joe Biden = Dark Helmet)
To: EveningStar
Maybe Sulu will get his health care benefits revoked and his sex change operation denied.
26
posted on
09/16/2009 3:42:18 PM PDT
by
Reagan Man
("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
To: EveningStar
Star Trek Sequel May Sure To Contain Pointed Modern Commentary Blatant Liberal Message and Ham-Fisted, One-Sided Polemics
27
posted on
09/16/2009 3:43:13 PM PDT
by
Alex Murphy
(...We never faced anything like this...we only fought humans.)
To: Fresh Wind
"What would make you say that?"
Gee, I have no idea...
To: Fresh Wind
That was written by the aformentioned Gene Coon. He used the pseudonym “Lee Cronin” because of a contractual conflict.
To: Fresh Wind; antiliberal
Don’t forget the one with the planet so stuffed with people that they wanted to get a disease to kill a bunch of them.
30
posted on
09/16/2009 3:52:06 PM PDT
by
FrogMom
(No such thing as an honest democrat!)
To: Night Hides Not
Wouldn't happen.
John Galt would blow Spock's mind.
31
posted on
09/16/2009 3:53:20 PM PDT
by
FredZarguna
(It looks just like a Telefunken U-47. In leather.)
To: Joe 6-pack
To: Alex Murphy
There weren’t any blatant liberal messages in the reboot, and this one is being done by the same team.
33
posted on
09/16/2009 3:54:21 PM PDT
by
discostu
(When I'm walking a dark road I am a man who walks alone)
To: discostu
"... and this one is being done by the same team."
That is the one and only consolation.
To: al baby
35
posted on
09/16/2009 3:56:00 PM PDT
by
Jet Jaguar
(A mob of one.)
To: the anti-liberal
Really reading the article I don’t see anything “scary”. They’re just saying you need to have some sort of situation normal people can relate to, which of course is true. but also that it’s primarily entertainment. Really JJ’s history doesn’t have much if any preaching in his shows, he mostly likes to tell stories that look like they have a lot of layers but really don’t, and he’s really fond of characters shifting allegiances.
36
posted on
09/16/2009 4:00:37 PM PDT
by
discostu
(When I'm walking a dark road I am a man who walks alone)
To: Question_Assumptions
This Kirk seemed a little more human, from a car accidentally off a cliff to interrupted coitus opportunity. Less high on the horse.
37
posted on
09/16/2009 4:00:57 PM PDT
by
tbw2
(Freeper sci-fi - "Humanity's Edge" - on amazon.com)
To: Vaquero
The last has got to be one of the best. I loved the young McCoy.
38
posted on
09/16/2009 4:01:56 PM PDT
by
LauraJean
(sometimes I win sometimes I donate to the equine benevolent society)
To: eddie willers
Since the DVD is not out yet, is it too late for me to whine "Spoiler Alert!"?I figured every Freeper who cared to look at this thread would already have seen it.
Apologies, but that is the tip of the iceberg for the secrets in this movie. I promise I didn't ruin anything except for one event that happens about 45 minutes in.
To: Joe 6-pack
40
posted on
09/16/2009 4:42:48 PM PDT
by
mikrofon
("Live Long and P***-poor...")
To: tarawa; TheOldLady; GeronL; Question_Assumptions; RansomOttawa; BrianInNC; gary_b_UK; Truth29; ...
A big thanks goes to Visualops for the Banner!!
41
posted on
09/16/2009 4:54:15 PM PDT
by
KevinDavis
(Can't Stop the Signal!)
To: Joe 6-pack
But first he has to take a tour of the galaxy so he can apologize for every bad thing the Federation has done...
To: tbw2
The original series had adults in charge, with episodes warning about putting kids in charge (Charlie X, Miri, And the Children Shall Lead, The Way To Eden). Missing that lesson in the post-60s world, it's now cool to have the kids in charge. As much as I liked the new movie (and I really did -- the living up to your father's example and Pike as a leader helped a great deal there), it does still remind me of the
younger SG-1 team parody from the 200th episode of Stargate SG-1.
To: EveningStar
Mom “Linda is on the phone”
Me “I am watching Star Trek”
To: bvw
Science Fiction has always dealt with allegory of various sorts. The original ST Tv show was a comment on Race Relations and Cold War tensions.
45
posted on
09/16/2009 5:34:34 PM PDT
by
Borges
To: EveningStar

Now more relevant than ever.
46
posted on
09/16/2009 5:37:45 PM PDT
by
x
To: Borges
I’m pretty sure Gene Roddenberry never would have described it as “pointed modern commentary”. That’s Obama-talk.
47
posted on
09/16/2009 5:44:04 PM PDT
by
bvw
To: x
He was more fun as the Riddler
48
posted on
09/16/2009 5:45:09 PM PDT
by
xp38
To: EveningStar
If they are making a pointed modern commentary, it will be about how anyone who opposes communism is a racist.
49
posted on
09/16/2009 5:45:45 PM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(Put butter on your tag line.)
To: EveningStar
On other words, Hollyweird people simply can’t stop themselves from moralist preaching at the general population... between their visits to divorce court and rehab.
50
posted on
09/16/2009 6:52:05 PM PDT
by
Seruzawa
(If you agree with the French raise your hand - If you are French raise both hands.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-53 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson