Skip to comments.
The Collider, the Particle and a Theory About Fate
NYTimes ^
| 10/12/09
| Dennis Overbye
Posted on 10/13/2009 1:13:12 AM PDT by LibWhacker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
To: allmost
I think the guy sounds like a quack with this theory.
Maybe he's just trying to get a grant. We'll know in a decade or three.
21
posted on
10/13/2009 2:02:25 PM PDT
by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
To: TangoLimaSierra
I’m a believer. My Little Killer cat reminds me of her reality every time she ambushes me. It seems to be her hobby.
22
posted on
10/13/2009 2:04:23 PM PDT
by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
To: LibWhacker
One problem with this idea is that some ultra-high energy proton collisions in the upper atmosphere far exceed what might be eventually attained by this terrestrial collider. It’s too bad we can’t somehow contain and analyze some of these collisions. Then we wouldn’t even have to build this machine.
23
posted on
10/13/2009 6:54:04 PM PDT
by
onedoug
To: onedoug
It’s too bad we can’t somehow contain and analyze some of these collisions.
Yet. We can't do that yet. :)
24
posted on
10/14/2009 9:13:30 AM PDT
by
allmost
To: LibWhacker
Here are the two to blame for this....
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson