Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mum's the Word for NASA's Secret Space Plane X-37B
Foxnews / Space.com ^ | Oct 22, 2009 | Leonard David

Posted on 10/22/2009 5:04:59 PM PDT by driftdiver

You would think that an unpiloted space plane built to rocket spaceward from Florida atop an Atlas booster, circle the planet for an extended time, then land on autopilot on a California runway would be big news. But for the U.S. Air Force X-37B project — seemingly, mum's the word.

There is an air of vagueness regarding next year's Atlas Evolved Expendable launch of the unpiloted, reusable military space plane. The X-37B will be cocooned within the Atlas rocket's launch shroud — a ride that's far from cheap.

While the launch range approval is still forthcoming, SPACE.com has learned that the U.S. Air Force has the X-37B manifested for an April 2010 liftoff.

As a mini-space plane, this Boeing Phantom Works craft has been under development for years. Several agencies have been involved in the effort, NASA as well as the Defense Advanced Projects Research Agency (DARPA) and various arms of the U.S. Air Force.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: airforce; nasa; space; x37

1 posted on 10/22/2009 5:04:59 PM PDT by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

sounds kind of cool.


2 posted on 10/22/2009 5:06:53 PM PDT by GeronL (http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Does this mean the X37a was epic fail?

Its certainly the ultimate in spy planes.


3 posted on 10/22/2009 5:09:08 PM PDT by omega4179
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

Too Bad! One more Program for OBOZO to screw up.......


4 posted on 10/22/2009 5:09:16 PM PDT by True Republican Patriot (May GOD Continue to BLESS Our Great President George W. Bush!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

ping


5 posted on 10/22/2009 5:11:35 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Its a reusable satellite. I guess you would just bring it home if it has to be fixed, recharged or reconfigured.

http://space.skyrocket.de/index_frame.htm?http://www.skyrocket.de/space/doc_sdat/x-37.htm


6 posted on 10/22/2009 5:11:59 PM PDT by omega4179
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: omega4179

Looks like a very high altitude Predator.

7 posted on 10/22/2009 5:15:55 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

NASA? Is that anything like NASSA?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T6xJzAYYrX8


8 posted on 10/22/2009 5:17:05 PM PDT by FrdmLvr ("The people will believe what the media tells them they believe." Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FrdmLvr

Not sure I understand your point.


9 posted on 10/22/2009 5:19:37 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Too high.
Ck the link I posted

I am not an engineer but I doubt existing missiles can be dropped from that high without melting on the way in.


10 posted on 10/22/2009 5:22:09 PM PDT by omega4179
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: omega4179

“I am not an engineer but I doubt existing missiles can be dropped from that high without melting on the way in.”

But...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_bombardment


11 posted on 10/22/2009 5:28:39 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

So, when does the Zero administration cancel the funding for this project?


12 posted on 10/22/2009 5:42:47 PM PDT by MGMSwordsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MGMSwordsman

3...2....1....


13 posted on 10/22/2009 5:45:55 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

Aviation Week says our alternative to a booster launch for space planes is the upgraded B-70/Sr-3 airlifter based at Groom Lake.

“A large “mothership,” closely resembling the U.S. Air Force’s historic XB-70 supersonic bomber, carries the orbital component conformally under its fuselage, accelerating to supersonic speeds at high altitude before dropping the spaceplane. The orbiter’s engines fire and boost the vehicle into space. If mission requirements dictate, the spaceplane can either reach low Earth orbit or remain suborbital.”

http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_generic.jsp?channel=awst&id=news/030606p1.xml

Looking at the x37 image I wonder if it is too heavy for the airlifter. You get no idea of proportions. Also I wonder do the stabilizers fold down for stowage in the booster shroud.


14 posted on 10/22/2009 6:13:28 PM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

It kinda looks like a Space Shuttle with Down Syndrome.


15 posted on 10/23/2009 6:30:56 AM PDT by I Buried My Guns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: I Buried My Guns

Put a hamster on board it will get news then Obama will hear of it and cancel it.


16 posted on 10/30/2009 11:54:25 AM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* 'I love you guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson