1 posted on
10/29/2009 7:16:39 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
To: AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; KevinDavis; Las Vegas Dave; ...
2 posted on
10/29/2009 7:17:05 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: SunkenCiv
3 posted on
10/29/2009 7:21:36 PM PDT by
bsf2009
To: SunkenCiv
Does Green’s appointment indicate that, at least in Cambridge’s mind, string theory is the anointed successor to general relativity?Curiouser and curiouser
4 posted on
10/29/2009 7:26:51 PM PDT by
darkwing104
(Lets get dangerous)
To: SunkenCiv
5 posted on
10/29/2009 7:27:29 PM PDT by
JoeProBono
(A closed mouth gathers no feet)
To: SunkenCiv
String Theory is horsepuckery. Lovely and furious equations signifying nothing.
This is tragic. It's "Not Even Wrong".
Here's some real science to cleanse the palette:
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/hep-th/pdf/0601/0601129v2.pdf
Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.7 posted on
10/29/2009 7:37:05 PM PDT by
The Comedian
(Evil can only succeed if good men don't point at it and laugh.)
To: SunkenCiv
at which point he reaches Lucasian retirement age (67). Where is Lucasia?
8 posted on
10/29/2009 8:32:04 PM PDT by
SIDENET
("If that's your best, your best won't do." -Dee Snider)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
