Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Warning Labels on Baseball Bats? [death of common sense alert]
Townhall.com ^

Posted on 11/16/2009 1:05:29 PM PST by TruthHound

It's natural to sympathize with the parents of Brandon Patch, the 18-year-old baseball pitcher who died after he was hit by a batted ball in 2003.

Sooner or later, sympathy must yield to logic and reason, so when Brandon's parents sued the bat's manufacturer, Louisville Slugger, and a jury awarded them $850,000, they contributed to the terribly misguided notion that behind every tragedy lies a lawsuit.

I haven't suffered what the Patches have suffered, and I pray that I never do. I understand that pursuing litigation gives them a sense that their son's random, pointless death was not so pointless.

However, the idiocy demonstrated by a Helena, Mont., jury won't bring back Brandon Patch, won't prevent similar accidents in the future, but will lead to more decisions based primarily on lawsuit avoidance rather than common sense...

(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Society
KEYWORDS: lawsuit; riskybehavior; tortreform; warninglabels
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
And I thought this one was silly: Pondscum Lawyers won't be satisfied until we have to tattoo every newborn with warnings. I want my plain car visor back.
1 posted on 11/16/2009 1:05:30 PM PST by TruthHound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TruthHound

“Warning: Kid, this hurts when you get hit in the head with it. Don’t do it!”


2 posted on 11/16/2009 1:06:27 PM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthHound
I want my plain car visor back.

I like the "Do not use in bathtub" warning on my wife's hairdryer.

Wouldn't the need for warnings like these eventually become irrelevant as people dumb enough to require them, eliminated themselves from the gene pool?

3 posted on 11/16/2009 1:08:17 PM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wbill

4 posted on 11/16/2009 1:12:53 PM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TruthHound

WARNING: Do not use this Microwave Oven to dry your hair.


5 posted on 11/16/2009 1:16:51 PM PST by Gator113 (Obamba, Reid, Pelosi, the socialist triad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthHound
I prefer wooden bats to metal bats — not for safety reasons but because metal bats are a scourge on the game, much like the designated hitter. The "crack" of a wooden bat is as American as apple pie; the "ping" of a metal bat is as hollow as the taste of the $2.99 store-bought substitute.

Actually, metal bats are more dangerous. There's a reason they are banned above the amateur level.

No, I don't think this lawsuit is justified. But I do have a problem with idiots turning a classical American outdoor game into a real-life version of a video game. Juiced up bats, balls and players all need to be banned.

6 posted on 11/16/2009 1:17:43 PM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthHound

What’s worse, this kind of venal gesture disgraces the memory of the dead. And it is logically, legally, and morally unsupportable.

What kind of a jury in its right mind could find a causal connection between the manufacturer of the bat and the kid’s death? And if that connection exists, what other specious connections can be made?

This should be appealed and reversed.


7 posted on 11/16/2009 1:21:04 PM PST by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthHound
Pondscum Lawyers

Correct.

8 posted on 11/16/2009 1:21:21 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthHound
This case will be appealed to the Montana sUPREME cOURT and it, by law, has to be accepted.

We'll see what the MT sUPREMES decide on this.

There are some awful justices - like Leaphart - on the MT SC. Let us all hope this horrendious decision is overturned so it is not forced to be appealed to the (yuck) Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

9 posted on 11/16/2009 1:21:45 PM PST by Leo Farnsworth (I'm not really Leo Farnsworth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthHound

My straightening iron came with the warning “Do not use this product while sleeping”.


10 posted on 11/16/2009 1:30:21 PM PST by christianhomeschoolmommaof3 (Best thing about Cash for Clunkers is that 90% of the Obama bumper stickers are now off the road.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IronJack
As someone pointed out on Town Hall, the BALL actually killed the boy, not that bat. Why not sue the ball manufacturer? /sarc

It is tragic that the boy died, but millions of kids play baseball, with metal bats, and such accidents are very rare. They can happen with wooden bats as well. Sometimes a tragedy is nobody's fault.

I think the author makes a great point that it is highly unlikely that a warning label would have prevented the league from using metal bats, or the parents from allowing their son to play in a league with metal bats.

The over saturation of warning labels is actually a danger, IMO. Because we see so many ridiculous, unnecessary warning labels on so many products, we are more likely to ignore the critical warnings along with the frivolous ones.

I'm sure one day, someone will sue on the grounds that a manufacturer put too many warning labels on a product, causing the user to miss the warning of a true danger. Actually, I wonder if this has happened already.

11 posted on 11/16/2009 1:35:46 PM PST by Above My Pay Grade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Above My Pay Grade
that a manufacturer put too many warning labels on a product, causing the user to miss the warning of a true danger

"hmmmmmm......"WARNING.....Failure... to..remove... this... sunshade...may....re- re- (what's that word???) RESULT!...in....a...." CRASH!

12 posted on 11/16/2009 1:41:25 PM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TruthHound

Found a box of Tampax Tampons:
Remove used tampon before inserting a new one.


13 posted on 11/16/2009 1:42:32 PM PST by b4its2late (Before you can control a horse, you have to break it. Sound familiar?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthHound

The reflective screen I put in my windshield when parked is labelled “Do not drive with screen in place.”


14 posted on 11/16/2009 1:45:36 PM PST by Sherman Logan ("The price of freedom is the toleration of imperfections." Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthHound; LucyT
When Lawyers Write Medical Protocols

The protocol in question is for an intraosseous IV.

15 posted on 11/16/2009 1:53:49 PM PST by Slings and Arrows ("When France chides you for appeasement, you know you're scraping bottom." --Charles Krauthammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
Actually, metal bats are more dangerous.

Wonder if someone will have to be killed before something is done about all the broken bats in MLB. Some of those slivers of wood are like daggers flying around the infield.

16 posted on 11/16/2009 1:56:25 PM PST by Churchillspirit (9/11/01...NEVER FORGET.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TruthHound

Why don’t they just go ahead and put the following on everything ....

“Warning: You’re too stupid to use this product. Put it down and back away, or use at your own risk.”


17 posted on 11/16/2009 2:24:32 PM PST by al_c (http://www.blowoutcongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthHound

Pathetic for these parents to put a price on their boy’s life. Now the parents can party.


18 posted on 11/16/2009 2:25:46 PM PST by MarineBrat (Better dead than red!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 60Gunner

Meant to ping you to post #15.


19 posted on 11/16/2009 2:25:50 PM PST by Slings and Arrows ("When France chides you for appeasement, you know you're scraping bottom." --Charles Krauthammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TruthHound

20 posted on 11/16/2009 2:27:05 PM PST by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson