Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Soldier Mom refuses deployment to care for baby
AP ^ | 11/16/2009 | Russ Bynum

Posted on 11/16/2009 6:26:41 PM PST by mom aka the evil dictator

SAVANNAH, Ga. – An Army cook and single mom may face criminal charges after she skipped her deployment flight to Afghanistan because, she said, no one was available to care for her infant son while she was overseas.

Spc. Alexis Hutchinson, 21, claims she had no choice but to refuse deployment orders because the only family she had to care for her 10-month-old son — her mother — was overwhelmed by the task, already caring for three other relatives with health problems.

Her civilian attorney, Rai Sue Sussman, said Monday that one of Hutchinson's superiors told her she would have to deploy anyway and place the child in foster care.

"For her it was like, 'I couldn't abandon my child,'" Sussman said. "She was really afraid of what would happen, that if she showed up they would send her to Afghanistan anyway and put her son with child protective services."

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: entitlement; hutchinson; womeninmilitary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-155 next last
To: mom aka the evil dictator

If the mom is telling the truth, she’s between a rock and a hard place. I’ve supervised people who had to make that decision, male and female, and it isn’t an easy one. Fortunately for me, and our mission, all of mine were able to find someone they could trust. If she can’t, she has to be about as alone as it’s possible to get.


41 posted on 11/16/2009 7:39:02 PM PST by Old Student (We have a name for the people who think indiscriminate killing is fine. They're called "The Bad Guys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laweeks

This is hardly new. Pregnancy is a well known way to avoid deployment. This woman has just taken it a step further by claiming that she can’t find child care.

Nothing will change, however. The women in the armed forces have enormous symbolic value to the left.


42 posted on 11/16/2009 7:41:19 PM PST by achilles2000 (Shouting "fire" in a burning building is doing everyone a favor...whether they like it or not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SZonian

I agree. Someone else will have to pick up her slack. It’s just too damn bad that same person wasn’t picking up her slack when promotions were being awarded.

It’s always chapped my ass that women join the service and get special treatment, and everyone else is expected to treat them as equals.


43 posted on 11/16/2009 7:44:29 PM PST by EricT. ("Mankind, when left to themselves, are unfit for their own government." -George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: jagusafr

>>AND all of us are required to have arrangements for the care of our minor children. If not, we need to resign or be involuntarily discharged. Sorry.

Colonel, USAFR<<

Maybe I am not understanding the instant situation then? Isn’t simple ID in order here?


44 posted on 11/16/2009 7:48:59 PM PST by freedumb2003 (Communism comes to America: 1/20/2009. Keep your powder dry, folks. Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: mom aka the evil dictator

A good portion of today’s military is a politically correct, welfare agency, forced diversity laboratory, and daycare center.

Witness this idiot—and many like her, as well as the career of Malik Hasan.

We have many fine people in the service today—(I wouldn’t go in today for a million bucks—and not because of the war-because of the enemies within)—most of those good folks with sore backs from carrying the load for the worthless—and we have great technology. Otherwise, we’d be in deep doo-doo.


45 posted on 11/16/2009 7:58:14 PM PST by Mac from Cleveland (Dreams from My Father--food, shelter, and education from some typical white folks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

The real kicker to me was the fact that Grandmomma cannot handle the baby but she can run a daycare. The whole thing sounds like a set-up so that the soldier doesn’t have to go to Afghanistan. These soldiers need to figure out how to not have children. I am betting baby’s daddy is a soldier also and he is probably not being deployed. So they aren’t together anymore...oh well. It is still his kid, let him have temporary custody.


46 posted on 11/16/2009 8:05:34 PM PST by mom aka the evil dictator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SevenofNine

I don’t see where anyone failed her. She chose to get pregnant and now she chooses not to honor her contract to the Army. She has known for some time that she would be deployed. Just deciding not to show up is inexcusable. I think she and her mom got together and decided this was a way not to be deployed. We had one show up at Ft Benning last year with her two kids claiming she couldn’t deploy because daddy worked long hours. Get it in the media and every softie will be screaming, “Let the mommy go home, poor mommy.” Never mind the military now has to send someone else.


47 posted on 11/16/2009 8:05:42 PM PST by mom aka the evil dictator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran

With any luck they will ask for that enlistment bonus back too!


48 posted on 11/16/2009 8:05:49 PM PST by mom aka the evil dictator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ronin

I have a child in Iraq (and 5 of his buddies who have adopted me).


49 posted on 11/16/2009 8:05:52 PM PST by mom aka the evil dictator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: mom aka the evil dictator

Baby, belongs with the mother...and mother with baby... easy call. I have two daughters in the USMC and still feel this way.


50 posted on 11/16/2009 8:09:39 PM PST by ShackledNoMore (Baby with mother and mother with baby...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randomhero97

Single moms or if one parent is already deployed. There are families that have both parents out there.


51 posted on 11/16/2009 8:10:25 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mom aka the evil dictator

Thanks for the support Mom!

Can I adopt you like your son’s buddies? I may be your age (or older) but we can never have too many Moms! ;) :)


52 posted on 11/16/2009 8:19:50 PM PST by freedumb2003 (Communism comes to America: 1/20/2009. Keep your powder dry, folks. Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Kirkwood

Looks like that is what happened:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/ap_on_re_us/us_soldier_mom_deployment


53 posted on 11/16/2009 8:22:48 PM PST by mom4kittys (If velvet could sing, it would sound like Josh Groban)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jagusafr
No need for the “sorry”.

No excuses required or accepted.
There exists numerous onerous duties in the military, hence the reason civilian people vaguely understand that military service requires a great deal of personal sacrifice.

I once stood as guardian for a fellow airman's child while she was TDY for training for six weeks. Since the timeframe was “so short”, we agreed that it made more sence for my family to cover hers, instead of the military mom relinquishing guardianship for her dependent child, and returning the child stateside

Every service member of all branches, married or single, with or without minor children, have to make prior arrangements for all of their dependents, in case of sudden deployment orders.

As a veteran, eligiable for re-enlistment, I had to make the hard decision to NOT rejoin the military, due to my personal family situation/obligations as a single parent after 91101.
Yes, I understand that my two terms of service, and honorable discharges from both,left no personal stain upon my honor, either way I decided.
In this case, the woman chose to dishonor her oath, and expects a court of law to “feel empathy” for her situation, enough to grant her special privileges not afforded to her peers.
I say she either accepts a dishonorable discharge,or spends a few years in Leavenworth, and then accepts a dishonorable discharge.

No excuses.

54 posted on 11/16/2009 8:25:02 PM PST by sarasmom (No incombent re-elected, at any level of government office.(Period))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: JayVee

I was thinking that the kid’s father should step up to the plate here. Unless he’s dead, maybe the court should order him to take temporary custody.


55 posted on 11/16/2009 8:25:07 PM PST by MayflowerMadam (If it's not close, they can't cheat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mom aka the evil dictator

The best solution to this problem is the one that will never occur. Women should never have been permitted to join the Armed Forces.


56 posted on 11/16/2009 8:26:40 PM PST by Nosterrex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

Well according to my son, I am now 120 years old. My birth certificate on the other hand says 46. Do you want Christmas presents too? :D Their St Nick packages go out tomorrow. The Christmas packages will go out the day after Thanksgiving.


57 posted on 11/16/2009 8:27:45 PM PST by mom aka the evil dictator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: randomhero97

“...servicewomen with children will use them to get out of just about everything.”

During my 40 years in the workforce, it’s been my experience that about 90% of ALL women use their children to “get out of just about everything”.


58 posted on 11/16/2009 8:28:22 PM PST by MayflowerMadam (If it's not close, they can't cheat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mom aka the evil dictator

How about my Christmas Present is to send them Christmas Presents? And I guess I am 150 or so... ;)


59 posted on 11/16/2009 8:31:31 PM PST by freedumb2003 (Communism comes to America: 1/20/2009. Keep your powder dry, folks. Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Irisshlass; SevenofNine
I understand this mother not wanting to abandoned her child...but you do have provide a guardian (paperwork, names, phone numbers, power of attorney etc) for your children in case you are deployed. It has been this way since the first Gulf War.

How many times does this bear repeating?

60 posted on 11/16/2009 8:34:12 PM PST by Grizzled Bear ("Does not play well with others.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-155 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson