Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Spielberg drops 'Harvey' remake
AFP on Yahoo ^ | 12/4/09 | AFP

Posted on 12/04/2009 5:46:07 PM PST by NormsRevenge

LOS ANGELES (AFP) – Oscar-winning US director Steven Spielberg has dropped plans to remake the Hollywood classic "Harvey" after failing to find the right star to take on the lead role made famous by James Stewart.

Initially, Spielberg had wanted Tom Hanks to take on the role of the gentle, mild-mannered Elwood P. Dowd, who just happens to say his best friend is an invisible giant rabbit.

But the industry daily Variety said Friday that Hanks was not that enthusiastic about the prospect of stepping into the legendary Stewart's footsteps.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: harvey; hollywood; nevermind; remake; spielberg
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
Robert Downey Jr. was also considered but wanted too many script changes.

Where is Jim Carrey? tsk tsk .. talk about a role made for him.

maybe Spielberg could re-make Gunga Din or do a sequel to ET or Close Encounters instead.

1 posted on 12/04/2009 5:46:08 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Al Gore with some script changes.


2 posted on 12/04/2009 5:47:25 PM PST by Brugmansian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Why? Why? Why?

If Hollywood is that talented, come up with something new!

I have an idea; researching it for years. Don't have the talent to write a script.

Why do these fools want to fool with the classics?

3 posted on 12/04/2009 5:51:01 PM PST by CaptRon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Not enough mugging in it for Carrey’s inestimable talent.


4 posted on 12/04/2009 5:51:55 PM PST by CaptRon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I think remake of that movie would sucks Norm

If they want do with special effects


5 posted on 12/04/2009 5:52:28 PM PST by SevenofNine ("We are Freepers, all your media belong to us, resistence is futile")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SevenofNine

It’s the lack of special effects that made it, well, special.


6 posted on 12/04/2009 5:54:01 PM PST by CaptRon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Hanks was not that enthusiastic about the prospect of stepping into the legendary Stewart's footsteps.

A wise move. He knows his limitations.

7 posted on 12/04/2009 5:56:57 PM PST by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaptRon

Yeah I talking about today audiences I saw Harvey on TCM other day my five year old nephew ask me where is special effect this sucks

I think to safe to say if they going do Harvey remake you got have special effect get Transformer movie going crowd that sad part about Today Hollywood and probably today audience


8 posted on 12/04/2009 5:57:46 PM PST by SevenofNine ("We are Freepers, all your media belong to us, resistence is futile")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SevenofNine

Then don’t remake it. The whole charm of the movie is we don’t see the rabbit.


9 posted on 12/04/2009 6:04:09 PM PST by CaptRon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Well, I’m glad that Hanks realizes his limitations. He could never fill Jimmy Stewart’s shoes.


10 posted on 12/04/2009 6:08:23 PM PST by My hearts in London - Everett (So the writer who breeds more words than he needs, is making a chore for the reader who reads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaptRon
Why? Why? Why?

If Hollywood is that talented, come up with something new!

I agree. Most of the DVds and Blu-rays I watch are of classic films. Harvey is over-rated anyway, and would never go over with today's Michael Bay fans.

11 posted on 12/04/2009 6:09:00 PM PST by Sans-Culotte (Make Hasan the new Willie Horton; brand the left as dangerous Diversity freaks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; Clemenza; Impy; Perdogg; Clintonfatigued

Two words:

Joe Pesci.


12 posted on 12/04/2009 6:13:34 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sans-Culotte

Not a great movie, but a great watch. Stewart in his most eccentric role. I don’t love it, but I like it.


13 posted on 12/04/2009 6:13:41 PM PST by CaptRon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
...Hanks was not that enthusiastic about the prospect of stepping into the legendary Stewart's footsteps...

There's not an actor today that could hold a candle to any of the greats like Stewart.

14 posted on 12/04/2009 6:20:54 PM PST by FReepaholic (Give me ambiguity or give me something else!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FReepaholic

I thought he already did a movie that Stewart had done before. (You’ve Got Mail, rehash of Little Shop Around the Corner)


15 posted on 12/04/2009 6:27:08 PM PST by Shimmer1 (When life hands you lemons, ask for tequila and salt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Shimmer1

I mean The Shop Around the Corner


16 posted on 12/04/2009 6:27:57 PM PST by Shimmer1 (When life hands you lemons, ask for tequila and salt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
But the industry daily Variety said Friday that Hanks was not that enthusiastic about the prospect of stepping into the legendary Stewart's footsteps.

Which shows that he is in fact smarter than a box of rocks. That is Jimmy Stewart's role and cannot be replayed by anyone.

17 posted on 12/04/2009 6:30:33 PM PST by nina0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaptRon
The whole charm of the movie is we don’t see the rabbit.

But we do, at the very end, see his silhouette through the office door.

18 posted on 12/04/2009 6:31:45 PM PST by nina0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: nina0113

Ah, but not for the whole movie!


19 posted on 12/04/2009 6:34:00 PM PST by CaptRon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Brugmansian
Would Al Gore play Dowd or Harvey? He'd be better in the latter role, so we don't have to see him.

Nobody would be able to surpass Jimmy Stewart. Before remaking Harvey, they should remake Gone with the Wind, The Wizard of Oz, Casablanca, and Birth of a Nation.

Also Triumph of the Will, but that needs to be an adaptation rather than a remake--Triumph of Hope and Change, to fit the era of Obama.

20 posted on 12/04/2009 6:35:24 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson