Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush Limbaugh's Suggestion For United States Immigration Policy (Video)
ChicoER Gate ^ | 6/29/10 | Rush

Posted on 06/29/2010 6:01:33 AM PDT by OneVike

Hosted by imgur.com

We all know about the many shenanigans the left pulls to steal elections. You also know about their desire to give blanket amnesty to all illegals just so they can be added to the Democrat voter base. Well we even had to deal with Bush, McCain, and other Republicans who thought amnesty was a good idea, but thankfully we beat them back. I pray we can do the same with the Fascists running thing today. Personally I like the one Rush Limbauagh has suggested. Listen to his reason and you too will agree with him, because it make sense.

So with no further ado, follow the link below and you can watch and listen to

Rush Limbaugh's Immigration Policy for America.



TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Education; Miscellaneous; Society
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; illegalaliens; immigration; limbaugh
When Rush speaks the liberals cringe. Imagine him and Palin on the ticket, now that would be awesome, but unfortunately Rush would not want to take the pay cut.
1 posted on 06/29/2010 6:01:38 AM PDT by OneVike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy; JesusBmyGod; buffyt; Whenifhow; rom; persistence48; Hanna548; DvdMom; ...
Video Ping!

Check out the video clip of Rush espousing his immigration policy...

• Send FReep Mail to OneVike to get [ON] or [OFF] article and video Ping List •


2 posted on 06/29/2010 6:04:16 AM PDT by OneVike (A Freeper in Christ since February of 1998)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

“Imagine him and Palin on the ticket”

Lol. Dream a dream.

I was just thinking about Palin-Keyes.


3 posted on 06/29/2010 6:11:49 AM PDT by chuck_the_tv_out ( <<< click my name: now featuring Freeper classifieds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chuck_the_tv_out

Unfortunately, Keys helped to give us Obama.


4 posted on 06/29/2010 6:15:48 AM PDT by OneVike (A Freeper in Christ since February of 1998)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

Transcript for the firewalled?


5 posted on 06/29/2010 6:18:08 AM PDT by Never on my watch (The person with the solution to the oil spill was aborted in January 1978)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

How? You think the Republican ever had that great a chance in Chicago?


6 posted on 06/29/2010 6:18:47 AM PDT by chuck_the_tv_out ( <<< click my name: now featuring Freeper classifieds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: chuck_the_tv_out

Keyes was an outsider, and many believe that he did more damage for us then good.

I’m just sayins is all. I can just go by what I have heard those who are much closer to the situation there then I am, have to say about it. And many think a different candidate would have done better.


7 posted on 06/29/2010 6:36:18 AM PDT by OneVike (A Freeper in Christ since February of 1998)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Never on my watch

I’ll look to see if I can find it. I am sure the transcript is on his site, but it may take a few for me to find it and I am pressed for time because I need to get ready for work. If I find it, I’ll freep mail it to you...

Sound fair?


8 posted on 06/29/2010 6:37:58 AM PDT by OneVike (A Freeper in Christ since February of 1998)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

No repeblican was going to win that race.

Jesus Christ could have returned, entered politics, and would have lost to the dem.

I can’t see how Keyes did ANYTHING that gave us Obama. If anything, he sounded the warning call about his extremism earlier than anyone, wouldn’t you agree?

He’s no good as a presidential candidate, but veep’s don’t do much. Keyes is eloquent.


9 posted on 06/29/2010 6:39:02 AM PDT by chuck_the_tv_out ( <<< click my name: now featuring Freeper classifieds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

we had no “different” candidates, because only an outsider would come in to run.

no one in this state was going to run.

no one was going to go through the Sun-Times, Tribune republican meat grinder, and subject their family to what Keyes voluntarily did. It pretty much destroyed his family.

even Ditka said “no way” after polling suggested he would win by a good margin.

God Bless Dr. Keyes for having the guts to run.

“Many believe” = the media. Screw them. “Many believe” McCain would be our best prospect. “Many believe” the Huckster can take on Obama. I don’t believe what “many believe” anymore. “Many Believe” = what they WANT you to believe. No thanks.


10 posted on 06/29/2010 6:54:48 AM PDT by esoxmagnum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

Thanks. Don’t put yourself out. I will take a look at his site when I get home in the evening.


11 posted on 06/29/2010 7:02:40 AM PDT by Never on my watch (The person with the solution to the oil spill was aborted in January 1978)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Never on my watch; OneVike

Is this it?

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_050310/content/01125113.guest.html
“”Limbaugh Immigration Solution: Secure the Borders, Obey the Law
May 3, 2010

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: To the phones, to Chicago. This is Paul, nice to have you on the program, sir. Hello.

CALLER: Hello, Mr. Limbaugh?

RUSH: Hi.

CALLER: Yes, sorry for my not perfect English. I’m a Polish native. Mr. Limbaugh, I might have missed one of your programs, (unintelligible) since like maybe seven years ago. I may miss your program. I never hear from you about what (unintelligible) about government should do, if anything, in order to solve the illegal immigration issue, you know, long-term (unintelligible) speaking, do you have any position on it? And if you allow later I can also (unintelligible) couple comments.

RUSH: Uhhh, well, yeah, I think I have offered not a solution per se. We already have laws on the books about immigration. All we’d have to do, Paul, is enforce them. We have a bunch of different categorizations of visas. The legal immigration in this country is a long process. It requires answering questions, taking tests, ascertaining whether or not the new arrivals want to assimilate and actually become part of our culture. We are ignoring the law when it comes to immigration on our southern border, and all we’d have to do is just enforce that law like we enforce it everywhere else against the Europeans, against the Asians, I mean everybody else in the world. It doesn’t require anything new here. It just requires our own federal government obeying its own laws. It’s not complicated.

CALLER: Understood, but the fact is in the States we have about 30 million people, illegal status, so, you know, the question is, because I don’t know what the existing immigration law is saying, but the fact is we have so many millions of people here, the question is besides, of course, let them leave, you know, and that’s a solution —

RUSH: I don’t see the contradiction here. That’s like saying we’ve got a bunch of people who have committed murder — well, let’s leave murder out of it. We’ve got a bunch of people who have robbed banks and stolen automobiles and we think it’s about 30 million of them we haven’t caught, but we’re going to really crack down now and make sure that no more banks are robbed and no more cars are stolen but the people that have stolen the cars and robbed the banks we’re going to figure a way to give them amnesty. You know, illegal is illegal. The biggest problem with all this is that a lot of people who do not want to enforce the law — like I saw a headline the other day, Paul, that said: “Illegal Aliens Accused of Breaking the Law,” as though that was news to somebody in the media reporting the story. If we’re not going to maintain the integrity of our own borders, we’re going to lose our sovereignty, we’re going to cease to be the nation that we are. This is not really complicated. It may be hard in a compassion sense, but it’s not really complicated.

CALLER: But (unintelligible) but again besides, you know, forcing the law, and forcing people to leave the country, do you think the federal government should solve it allowing illegal to stay here and (unintelligible)? Just, you know, thinking about it, how the government could or should solve this, thinking that those people want to be here and what do you think, what term, if any, would be under consideration of government to do it.

RUSH: Well, there a lot of people that want to be here and there is no country in the world that is as easy to emigrate legally to as the United States. If these people couldn’t get work, they would leave. It’s that simple. This new Arizona law is acting as its own deportation law. People are leaving Arizona because they know now the law’s going to be enforced, they know now that they can’t get hired, so they’re leaving. Now, I know the point of your question, because I’m host, and I am well aware of many people trying to trick the host. It’s a game that callers make. And what you’re trying to get me to do is say something deathly unkind about the so-called 30 million illegals here. What you’re hoping I will say is, “Round ‘em up and kick ‘em out, and if they won’t go, throw ‘em out,” that’s what you want me to say. And I’m not going to say that. I have never said, whatever number are here illegally, “Round ‘em up and deport ‘em.” It isn’t realistic. You want to diminish the secure-the-borders argument when that’s the number one priority. We have to do that, we have to stop the influx, that’s not insignificant. So you can’t pose a question to me, “Okay, Mr. Limbaugh, after we secure the borders...” the borders are key. And then we come up with a plan, I could give you two or three of them that would help legalize these people if they’re willing to assimilate. We don’t want a Balkanized America here, and that’s what this is leading to as well. It really isn’t complicated. It’s just a matter of following the law.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: Let me ask you, since this immigration question keeps coming up: Why do we keep doing the same thing over and over when we know it doesn’t work? How many amnesties have we granted? We had Simpson-Mazzoli when Reagan was in office, where we gave amnesty to two or three million people. We tried it once at least since then. It doesn’t work. If you’re not going to protect and enforce your own border, you can give manifest to all the people in the country illegally but you’re not doing one thing to dissuade anybody from continuing to come here. In fact, when you give them amnesty, you are in fact, perhaps, motivating or inspiring them to keep coming. If these people couldn’t get work they would leave — and they’re having trouble getting work now because everybody’s having trouble getting work because of the economic downturn.

So we know that granting amnesty doesn’t work. We tried it 24 years ago. It only made matters worse. Yet here we’re back, “We gotta grant amnesty,” and because the people talking about granting amnesty, let me repeat, are not interested in solving the problem. They need more voters, pure and simple. They’re not trying to fix the country, solve a problem. They’re not even trying to help the illegal immigrants. They’re just being used. This is just a bunch of selfish politicians, wherever you find them, who look at this big group of people as potential voters. They’re also looked at as potential wards of the state, future members of the totally dependent class which is the best way to get their votes. So why does everybody insist that the only solution to our immigration problem is to do something we’ve already tried and has failed miserably? You know, we think, we tell ourselves we can change the climate of the world.

We can change the climate of the world! We can stop all this global warming. But we can’t stop people coming across our border. We just can’t. Such a shame. We can’t stop people from coming across the border. We’re going to change the climate of the planet, there’s no question we can do that.The ChiComs had an earthquake, remember? They asked for assistance. The ChiComs were asking for aid for their recent earthquake. There’s only one United States, and it is always under attack. It always has been under attack. The difference now is that our threat contains an internal component as well as external.
END TRANSCRIPT””


12 posted on 06/29/2010 9:11:12 AM PDT by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: iowamark; Never on my watch

No it’s not the transcript.

Basically Rush is saying that our policy should be exactly the same as Mexico’s.

In the video, you see Rush giving a list of what he thinks our policy should be. Then at the end he points out that it is exactly the same as Mexico’s policy, and we should do the same.


13 posted on 06/29/2010 9:29:07 AM PDT by OneVike (A Freeper in Christ since February of 1998)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 3pools; 3rdcanyon; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; 7.62 x 51mm; ..

Ping!


14 posted on 06/29/2010 2:46:36 PM PDT by HiJinx (John 10:1 - He who enters not by the gate...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneVike
Not true, Keys made a last minute attempt to beat him because there was zero opposition to the turd.
15 posted on 06/29/2010 6:33:06 PM PDT by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson