Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Darwinian Liberalism
CATO Unbound ^ | July 12, 2010 | Larry Arnhart

Posted on 07/14/2010 6:36:07 AM PDT by C19fan

Libertarians need Charles Darwin. They need him because a Darwinian science of human evolution supports classical liberalism.

In his review of Darwin’s Origin of Species in 1860, Thomas Huxley declared, “every philosophical thinker hails it as a veritable Whitworth gun in the armory of liberalism.” The Whitworth gun was a new kind of breech-loading cannon — a powerful weapon, then, for liberalism.

(Excerpt) Read more at cato-unbound.org ...


TOPICS: History; Science
KEYWORDS: darwin; liberal; ntsa
The reason why I post this is not evolution vs. creation debat but to point out something historical. The author of this article is just a continuation of "political thinkers" going back to the publication of Darwin's work who have used Darwin's work to justify the whole spectrum of political philosophies from Classical Liberalism to Marxism and Nazism.
1 posted on 07/14/2010 6:36:08 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: C19fan

People have misused information innumerable times over the years, including religious texts. Evolution loses some of its luster when it’s boiled down to “a change in allele frequency through time,” which is all it really comes down to.


2 posted on 07/14/2010 7:07:12 AM PDT by whattajoke (Let's keep Conservatism real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

The main significance of the article is that it indicates how desperate the Cato crowd is to try to justify natural rights without God.

The article is an obvious failure, just as every effort after David Hume laid down his challenge has been a failure. The claim that Darwinism brings something extra to the table beyond classical liberalism itself is also wrong.

Unfortunately for Cato, you can’t have natural rights in any meaningful sense without God. But they don’t want God because Christianity is so declasse in their inside the Beltway circles, and Christianity interferes with the pursuit of “sex, drugs, and rock and roll.”

Even Murray Rothbard knew that this was an enormous problem, and I was in a meeting years ago at Harvard when Nozick rubbed Murray’s face in it. All Murray could say was that libertarians needed more philosophical firepower.

Secular libertarians can’t get past this problem, which is a critical weakness the left exploits. This is why Cato-style libertarians ultimately find themselves making utilitarian arguments.


3 posted on 07/14/2010 8:04:33 AM PDT by achilles2000 ("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: achilles2000

Great stuff!


4 posted on 07/14/2010 8:09:30 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson