Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Spy Author John Le Carré No Fan of James Bond: I 'Dislike' Ian Fleming's 'Neo-Fascistic' 00
New York Daily News ^ | Monday, August 23rd 2010 | MICHAEL SHERIDAN

Posted on 08/23/2010 5:03:05 PM PDT by nickcarraway

It's still spy author vs. spy.

Famed espionage writer John Le Carré remains no fan of James Bond, the martini-loving super spy created by Ian Fleming.

"I dislike Bond. I'm not sure that Bond is a spy," the "Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy" author said in 1966, during a BBC interview that will be re-broadcast next week.

Today, the 78-year-old Le Carré told the Radio Times that while he may have been harsh 40 years ago, he's still not sure Bond is much of a spy.

"At the root of Bond there was something neo-fascistic and totally materialist," said Le Carré, who once worked with the British Foreign Service. "You felt he would have gone through the same antics for any country really, if the girls had been so pretty and the Martinis so dry."

Le Carré - whose real name is David Cornwell - described 007 as more of an "international gangster" who sported a "license to kill," and had no real loyalty to England.

"I think that it's a great mistake if one's talking about espionage literature to include Bond in this category at all," he said.

Le Carré's own spy character, George Smiley, appears in several of the author's works and stands in stark contrast to the Fleming creation. The author admits that his approach to spy novels is far more realistic than the gadget-obsessed adventures of James Bond.

"I had written about the reality in 'The Spy Who Came In From The Cold,'" he told Radio Times. "The Fleming stuff was a deliberate fantasisation."


TOPICS: Books/Literature; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: davidcornwell; espionage; georgesmiley; ianfleming; jamesbond; johnlecarre; literature
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

1 posted on 08/23/2010 5:03:09 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Le Carre sucks and is a lib. The Spy Who Came Out of the Cold largely sucked.

The best of the bunch was Michael Caine as Harry Palmer in the Ipcress File and Funeral In Berlin.


2 posted on 08/23/2010 5:05:53 PM PDT by Frantzie (Imam Ob*m* & Democrats support the VICTORY MOSQUE & TV supports Imam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Next this anti-semite will be blaming “James Bond” and his creator, Ian Fleming, as being “Zionists”. He might even be a closet “Burqua Boy”, if memory serves me correctly.

Le Carre’ is also anti-American. Check out his statements for the past 10-20 years.


3 posted on 08/23/2010 5:07:04 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
You don't want to know what John Grisham really thinks about that awful Sherlock Holmes either.
4 posted on 08/23/2010 5:09:10 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Sounds jealous. Maybe he should see a therapist about that.


5 posted on 08/23/2010 5:09:53 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (Hail To The Fail-In-Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Le Carre and the absence of a sense of humor. Coming next - doubts about Indiana Jones as an archaeologist.


6 posted on 08/23/2010 5:11:10 PM PDT by alecqss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Many years ago I tried valiantly but just could never finish a Le Carre “thriller”. According to his reasoning Mata Hari was not a spy, but Edith Clavell was. Guess what John they both were.


7 posted on 08/23/2010 5:13:44 PM PDT by nkycincinnatikid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

I read a few of his novels years ago. Boy, did I struggle with them. I’ve never returned since. From what I’ve heard of his political beliefs, I never will return to his books.


8 posted on 08/23/2010 5:16:13 PM PDT by bcsco ("Obama is the navel of his own universe.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Hey John, How many people even know who George Smiley is?


9 posted on 08/23/2010 5:17:24 PM PDT by mylife (Opinions $1 Halfbaked 50c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie
Le Carre sucks [is a fantastic author] and is a lib.

Fixed it for you.

10 posted on 08/23/2010 5:18:46 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nkycincinnatikid
Pretty sure Le Carre is a commie. I tried three times to read his book Russia House and all three times couldn't make it past 50 pages it sucked that bad. I think I can safely say that no other book that I attempted to read was so horrible that I had to keep quitting it.

The only other book that came close to turning me off as much was Dutch the official biography of Ronald Reagan, although for very different reasons. In that book the nitwit author inserted his own character in the story of Reagan's life and seemed to give more attention to the fictitious character than to the true exploits of Reagan himself. In a biography? I don't think so!

11 posted on 08/23/2010 5:22:46 PM PDT by marlon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Le Carré is a stuck up, Bush-hating, anti-American POS. I have very little time for his idiotic nonsense.
12 posted on 08/23/2010 5:22:46 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nkycincinnatikid
Edith Cavell was a patriot and a spy. She knew she was risking her life, and she did it deliberately, because she believed it to be the right thing to do.

Mata Hari, was an adventuress, for lack of a better word. She may well have been a spy, though there is some doubt. If she did do it, it was not from any sense of conviction, but for money or she was using or being used by her lovers.

13 posted on 08/23/2010 5:24:11 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

I wonder what he thinks of Eric Ambler.


14 posted on 08/23/2010 5:25:10 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

That would make sense. Lc’s books are tedious and pretty boring. Not to mention the Hero ALLWAYS dies. In the end.


15 posted on 08/23/2010 5:26:46 PM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
"You felt he would have gone through the same antics for any country really, if the girls had been so pretty and the Martinis so dry."

I fail to see the problem here, especially if Britain pays the tab. :)

16 posted on 08/23/2010 5:30:12 PM PDT by Brett66 (Where government advances, and it advances relentlessly , freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

At the root of Bond there was something neo-fascistic and totally materialist,” said Le Carré, who once worked with the British Foreign Service. “You felt he would have gone through the same antics for any country really, if the girls had been so pretty and the Martinis so dry.”

Although he’s a work of fiction I strongly disagree....Bond enjoyed the finer things in life and women but wasn’t completely about the money...


17 posted on 08/23/2010 5:32:36 PM PDT by jakerobins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
I saw Funeral in Berlin when it came out in the 60's. It sucked.

Like others here, I struggled with one of his "esteemed novels". It sucked.

"Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy" in spite of Alec Guinness playing George Smiley - Sucked.

So, David Cornwall, do you notice some kind of pattern here?

What is with you Brits who claim, through some name changing magic, to be connected to the French? You and that other socialist, anti-semetic hump Brian Peter George St John le Baptiste de la Salle Eno.

John, your just jealous that only a few die-hard leftists will remember you and your work, if only vaguely, while Fleming and Bond will still be renowned far into the future.

18 posted on 08/23/2010 5:36:04 PM PDT by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

You may agree with Le Carre that Mata Hari was materialist, etc and therefor not a spy but the French killed her just the same.


19 posted on 08/23/2010 5:42:33 PM PDT by nkycincinnatikid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: nkycincinnatikid

I’m just saying Edith Clavell was a patriot and knew what she was doing. Do you think Mata Hari was a German patriot?


20 posted on 08/23/2010 5:54:40 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson