[PA-RIVER]

Mr. Lakin now has standing. This Judge just gave it to him.

[conservativegramma]

Yes, but can’t SCOTUS claim ‘no standing’ anyhow and just ignore the case as they have been doing previously???

Can you tell I have zero faith in SCOTUS????

We are now living without law. It is now official that there is no justice, no redress of grievance in the court system. A key condition that led to the Revolution. We’ve come full circle.

[Daisyjane69]

I’m not a lawyer, so please forgive the silly question.

Why does he have standing now, what is now different?

I’m a plant nut, not a law nut.

:)

[hennie pennie]

Hi, if you have the time, energy & inclination, can you explain further HOW this judge conferred legal STANDING to Terry Larkin? If what you state is accurate, this is not this reason to CELEBRATE??? TIA

[EDINVA]

I believe this is a military court, not an Article III court where standing has been an issue. As a defendant in a military proceeding (court martial), Lakin had standing from Day One. That doesn’t mean his motions, i.e., for discovery, would be granted.