Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mitch Daniels in 2012

Posted on 11/09/2010 9:52:35 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27

Can anyone tell me about Mitch Daniels?

My Conservative good friend goes on and on about how perfect he is to save us and that we need a technocrat like Daniels in the WH.

I wanna hear the good and bad about him.

Thanks.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: daniels; mitch; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: sonofagun

Unreal, dunno what to think of this guy.


21 posted on 11/09/2010 10:53:45 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

I know he recently deprived a House district in Indiana of a prompt special election to fill a vacant House seat.


22 posted on 11/09/2010 10:54:51 AM PST by mewzilla (Still voteless in NY-29. Over 400 roll call votes missed and counting...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

See post 21.


23 posted on 11/09/2010 10:55:31 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: libbylu

REally?
I haven’t heard anything like that.
He’s said repeatedly that he’s committed to reducing the state budget and continuing fiscal stability WITHOUT raising taxes.

I like him.


24 posted on 11/09/2010 10:55:50 AM PST by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
Pass. He's the one who came out for a "truce" on social issues. In other words, surrender to the left.

No thanks.
25 posted on 11/09/2010 10:56:42 AM PST by Antoninus (Fair warning: If Romney's the GOP nominee in 2012, I'm looking for a new party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

FWIW, I wouldn’t vote for the guy for dog catcher.


26 posted on 11/09/2010 10:58:29 AM PST by mewzilla (Still voteless in NY-29. Over 400 roll call votes missed and counting...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE
I like him.

Between his penchant for taxes and his dismissal of social issues, I find him undesirable to represent the Republican Party in Washington, much less as POTUS.

And he's my governor.

27 posted on 11/09/2010 11:01:02 AM PST by sonofagun (Some think my cynicism grows with age. I like to think of it as wisdom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Publius Valerius

I think that’s a very fair and balanced and substantive summary. I would add that as Director of OMB under President Bush, he earned the nickname “Mitch the Knife” for trimming budgets and spending proposals. Most of Bush’s problems with over-spending came after Daniels left OMB.

I also think it’s worth qualifying a couple of things in your and earlier posts:

Mitch isn’t against conservative social issues, he just believes that the primary focus needs to be on economic issues while this country remains in such miserable share with high unemployment and stagnant growth and structural deficits as far as the eye can see.

My guess is that he would be very good at re-establishing Federal Responsibility: making States be accountable for the problems they bring upon themselves. He would be very much against any kind of bailout of California, NY, ILL, etc. after what he put Indiana through to get its fiscal house in order.

Finally, on his being open to the VAT, I think he said that within the context of an overall reform of the tax code. I know that may sound foolish and providing an opening to the tax-and-spend loving Dems, so I guess he can be criticized for providing that opening.

I hope this helps to fill out your excellent summary but please feel free to edit/correct anything I’m suggesting here. JMHO.


28 posted on 11/09/2010 11:02:36 AM PST by ReleaseTheHounds ("The problem with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money." M. Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sonofagun

Mine, too.


29 posted on 11/09/2010 11:03:52 AM PST by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
Mitch Daniels is a NoGo!

Our Republic cannot be saved by s leader who is unwilling to stand up against the murder of innocent, defenseless human life!

Yeah, maybe Secretary of Treasury, or SEC Chairman, but no way as President.

30 posted on 11/09/2010 11:16:36 AM PST by J Edgar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

An outstanding, no nonsense, straight talking Governor who does not suffer fools well. He has kept Indiana upright while all of the states around us floundered. He has a decent record on the social issues though he does not push them or let them get in the way of doing what needs to be done fiscally. He has appointed pro-life judges, is well liked by Indiana Right to Life and has a pretty fair rating from the NRA, but probably does not lead enough on these issue to satisfy the single issue voters here on Freeper. I am sure you will get a lot of responses condemning him for his statement about putting the social issues on the back burner until we get our fiscal house in order, but that is exactly what most of the GOP candidates did this year and it turned out pretty well it seemed to me.

He makes hard choices and p*sses off a lot of people doing it, but doesn’t seem to care. He believes strongly in the private sector, supports choice in education, has taken on the ISTA/NEA over education reform and believes in limited government. One of his favorite saying is, “People are often amazed at how little government they need”. When asked once about his opposition to more spending for third grade remedial reading courses, his answer was simple, “By the time a child reaches third grade we have already spent $43,000 trying to teach him to read. If that isn’t enough money then I think we have a systemic problem in how the school teaches reading not a problem with lack of funding.”

He is physically not your perfect candidate, kind of short and nerdy looking, and as mentioned earlier doesn’t mince words or worry to much about being PC. I’m not sure that will be such a detriment in 2012, we elected the president from central casting last time and look what it got us.

As you can probably guess I love the guy and think he would make s great president. He is experienced, has both government and private sector experience, is bright and has been successful at almost everything he done as far as I know.

Just to really make some heads explode here I will make some comparisons between him and the hated Mitt Romney. Both have successful private sector experience, Mitch has more varied governmental experience. Both are bright, and well educated, but Mitch connects much better with the average guy on the street. Mitch has none of the question hanging around him about his conservative bona fides. Mitt is better and more presidential looking. They are about the same age. Mitt married his HS sweetheart and is still married to her, Mitch got married, then divorced and then remarried his wife. Mitt has 3 boys, Mitch has 3 girls. Mitt’s wife is nice, but reserved. Mitch’s wife is a hoot and a favorite at the Indiana State Fair where she is a judge for numerous food and largest vegetable/fruit/pig/cow/etc. contests. She even participates in the cow milking contest every year.

I hope he runs, is nominated and takes Michele Bachmann as his running mate. The Country could do much worse.


31 posted on 11/09/2010 11:29:48 AM PST by redangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redangus

Despite my reservations, when the time comes I’ll give him a fair hearing.


32 posted on 11/09/2010 11:36:05 AM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: redangus
I was a big supporter of Daniels until the VAT comment. That gave me a mild case of the willies....he needs to give a satisfactory explanation before I would support him.

I do agree that America is ready for a "nerdy", green-eyeshade President who will not sugar coat the fact that we are in for a number of years of austerity.

33 posted on 11/09/2010 12:02:16 PM PST by Notary Sojac (I've been ionized, but I'm okay now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Retired COB

I agree that we should not be “means testing” Social Security and Medicare, but we are going to have to seriously cut those programs. If we don’t means test, then it will be across the board.


34 posted on 11/09/2010 12:04:50 PM PST by Notary Sojac (I've been ionized, but I'm okay now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE

I’ll find it for you when I have time. On politico and I think hotair.


35 posted on 11/09/2010 12:33:16 PM PST by libbylu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1010/43648.html
Links are everyone on google.


36 posted on 11/09/2010 12:35:12 PM PST by libbylu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson