Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Consumers Weigh in on Their New Smart Phones – iPhone v. Motorola v. BlackBerry v. Samsung v. HTC
The Investor Place ^ | November 19, 2010 | By Paul Carton, Vice President of Research, ChangeWave

Posted on 11/19/2010 5:43:22 PM PST by Swordmaker

ChangeWave survey looks at reactions and impressions of new smart phone owners

An onslaught of new smart phones have hit the market recently as manufacturers battle one another to meet the sharply escalating demand for new features and leading-edge technologies.

To find out which manufacturers are currently winning and losing this battle, we asked 1,212 consumers who had purchased smart phones within the past six months to rate their new models. The ChangeWave survey was completed November 2, 2010.

Customer Satisfaction Ratings

First off, we looked at customer satisfaction with the new smart phones that respondents had purchased during the past six months.

The following chart shows the percentage who said they were Very Satisfied with the smart phone they’d purchased – broken out by manufacturer:

As we’ve consistently seen in our consumer smart phone demand surveys, the Apple iPhone continues to outperform the industry in terms of customer satisfaction – with better than three-in-four new iPhone owners (77%) reporting they’re Very Satisfied with their new model.

The surprise finding is Motorola’s exceptionally strong second place showing, with 71% of new Motorola smart phone owners saying they’re Very Satisfied with their purchase – 8-pts ahead of third place HTC (63%).

Lagging behind these three smart phone leaders we find the Very Satisfied ratings for Samsung (45%) and Research in Motion (44%). But it’s important to remember that both companies just recently released their newest models (e.g., the Samsung Galaxy S line and the RIM Torch) and they’re only partially reflected in the overall satisfaction ratings.

Here is a further breakdown of the satisfaction ratings for individual models from these smart phone manufacturers.

Apple iPhone 4. The iPhone 4’s exceptionally high Very Satisfied rating (84% for 32GB; 78% for 16GB) confirms our earlier survey findings that despite the controversy surrounding its initial launch, the iPhone 4 has been extraordinarily well received by its owners. These iPhone 4 scores are even better than the ratings for the earlier generation iPhone 3GS models (81% for 32GB; 77% for 16GB) which were recorded in our May 2010 new smart phone owners survey.
Motorola Droid 2 and Droid X. The Droid 2 – Motorola’s latest release in its Android lineup of smart phones – also received an exceptionally high Very Satisfied rating (74%), as did the Droid X (71%) which was released one month earlier. Both models have exceeded the satisfaction rating for the original Droid (69%), recorded in our May 2010 ChangeWave survey.
HTC EVO 4G and Droid Incredible. A huge player in the Android smart phone market, HTC released its latest models last spring but they continue to outperform – with the EVO 4G registering a 76% Very Satisfied rating and the Droid Incredible 70%. Both remain among the top rated smart phones in the industry and well ahead of the rating for other HTC phones (45%).
Research in Motion (RIM) Torch. In an encouraging sign for RIM, their latest new model – the BlackBerry Torch – received a 64% Very Satisfied rating, significantly higher than the Bold (48%), Curve (40%) and other BlackBerry RIM models (37%). The high Very Satisfied rating for the Torch is a breakthrough for the Canadian smart phone manufacturer – who has lagged in customer satisfaction for the past two years of ChangeWave surveys – but it still ranks below the top-rated models of Apple, Motorola and HTC.

Samsung Galaxy S. Better than half (55%) of the purchasers of Samsung Galaxy S smart phones report they’re Very Satisfied with their new models, compared with just 28% for all other Samsung models.

iPhone vs. the Competition

With the rumors and speculation continuing about the imminent release of a new Verizon iPhone, what impact would such a move have on the smart phone market?

We asked non-AT&T respondents whether they’d have still purchased their new smart phone if the iPhone had been available at their wireless service provider at the time of purchase. The results show the continuing threat the iPhone poses to the rest of the industry.


* Note that 20% reported they ‘Don’t Know’ which phone they would have purchased.

In short, an extraordinary one-in-three non-AT&T smart phone buyers (34%) say they’d have bought the iPhone instead if it had been available at their service provider.

A closer look at the results by specific manufacturer shows that new Motorola smart phone purchasers are likeliest to say they’d have bought the Apple iPhone (37%) if it had been available from their service provider.

The ChangeWave survey was completed November 2, 2010. Full report details include:

The complete ChangeWave report is available here.




TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: hitech; ilovebillgates; iwanthim; iwanthimbad; microsoftfanboys; mobiledevices; smartphones
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 11/19/2010 5:43:24 PM PST by Swordmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~; 1234; 50mm; Abundy; Action-America; acoulterfan; AFreeBird; Airwinger; Aliska; ...
Changewave survey of Smartphone customer satisfaction and regrets—PING!

Please No Flame Wars!
Discuss technical issues, software, and hardware.
Don't attack people!

Don't respond to the Anti-Apple Thread Trolls!
PLEASE IGNORE THEM!!!


Apple v. everyone else's Smartphone Ping!

If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me.

2 posted on 11/19/2010 5:46:37 PM PST by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft product "insult" free zone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

I believe Apple was so foolish in keeping their iPhone restricted to AT&T networks. Why restrict yourself in such a way? I know I would have bought one, but AT&T isn’t available in my area. I’m SURE I’m not the only one.


3 posted on 11/19/2010 5:54:18 PM PST by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

I suspect Apple’s suppliers were just able to meet demand of the ATT signups...


4 posted on 11/19/2010 5:59:01 PM PST by tubebender (If you can not read, this thread will tell you how to get help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KoRn
I believe Apple was so foolish in keeping their iPhone restricted to AT&T networks. Why restrict yourself in such a way? I know I would have bought one, but AT&T isn’t available in my area. I’m SURE I’m not the only one.

Foolish had NOTHING to do with it. Apple offered the iPhone to Verizon first but Verizon want the iPhone to be ala carted to death, wanting to charge for each and every "extra service" as they were already doing on their other phones, and refused to make the network changes necessary for things like visual voice mail to work... Cingular Wireless was willing to present the iPhone as a package and to make the changes... in exchange for a period of exclusivity in the US market. They were the ONLY carrier willing to do it. Cingular was bought by SBCGlobal... which then changed it's name to AT&T before the iPhone was released. The rest said "No Way." The "rest" in the USA were left waiting in the dust of the success of the iPhone... including Verizon and T-Mobile.

It has taken THREE years for an iPhone "wanna be" system, Android, to come close to offering on those other carriers what the iPhone has been offering. According to this, one-third of the Android and RIM purchasers would have preferred to have purchased an iPhone, if they could have. . . I bet it would have been higher, We shall see in January when the exclusivity to AT&T ends... and Verizon finally gets the iPhone.

5 posted on 11/19/2010 6:03:19 PM PST by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft product "insult" free zone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

Motorola Droid.... not so much. Can’t wait till iPhone comes to Verizon.


6 posted on 11/19/2010 6:09:46 PM PST by big'ol_freeper ("[T]here is nothing so aggravating [in life] as being condescended to by an idiot" ~ Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
"According to this, one-third of the Android and RIM purchasers would have preferred to have purchased an iPhone, if they could have"

lol I'm one of those. I have a Blackberry. It was the best thing I could get around here at the time. I would LOVE to have an iPhone. The BB has been good for what I need it for though. I pretty much just use the phone for voice, an occasional email/browsing session, and a quick pic if I need it. I recently purchased an iPad, and it has almost replaced my netbook entirely.

7 posted on 11/19/2010 6:10:12 PM PST by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Count me among the “woulda if I coulda”


8 posted on 11/19/2010 6:11:21 PM PST by big'ol_freeper ("[T]here is nothing so aggravating [in life] as being condescended to by an idiot" ~ Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

I’d be lost without my BB.
I also bought the Otter protective cover for it when I upgraded last year. A cop recommended it.


9 posted on 11/19/2010 6:14:12 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Impeachment !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

That’s an assumption right there, that Verizon would get the iPhone once the exclusivity agreement ended. More likely T-Mobile will get the iPhone as their networks are compatible with current technology.


10 posted on 11/19/2010 6:22:07 PM PST by benjibrowder (For Neda. May God bless those fighting for freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
My sons switched to Droids, 2 of them had IPhones......they were so frustrated with ATT coverage and the dropped calls..so far my 3 boys are liking the Droids...I have my youngest sons IPhone and I really like the phone....I am not a fan of ATT, I have not experienced the dropped calls but the customer service is a source of frustration for me....grrrrrrr
11 posted on 11/19/2010 6:42:09 PM PST by Kimmers (Tell a lie often enough it becomes political........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

How Smartphone Users See Themselves and Each Other

12 posted on 11/19/2010 6:44:14 PM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

The original iPhone works on GSM wireless networks. AT&T and t-Mobile use GSM. This “new” Verizon iPhone will use CDMA which is not compatible with GSM. Sprint, Verizon and USCellular are CDMA networks.


13 posted on 11/19/2010 7:14:10 PM PST by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

ping smart phones


14 posted on 11/19/2010 7:25:00 PM PST by TNoldman (Call 1911 not 911!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reg45

So the new iPhones will work on US Cellular networks? I might finally be able to get one then! US Cellular is my only option for cell service.


15 posted on 11/19/2010 7:40:59 PM PST by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

I’ve seen an iPhone in an Otterbox Defender that came back from two tours in Iraq. The plastic screen cover was worn to a dull haze by the sand, but the phone inside was fine.

It won’t protect against full immersion, but it’ll stand up to just about anything else. The downside is that it’s huge.


16 posted on 11/19/2010 8:36:03 PM PST by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: benjibrowder

There are a few jailbroken iPhones on T Mobile already.


17 posted on 11/19/2010 9:27:38 PM PST by dangerdoc (see post #6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: KoRn
Here is a link to a Wikipedia article which shows which carriers use which technology:

US Wireless Carriers

One important thing to note: International wireless is almost always GSM, so CDMA phones probably will not work when you are on vacation or business overseas, while GSM phones will.

18 posted on 11/20/2010 8:26:06 AM PST by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: reg45

Why not just have one wireless type that every carrier can use? It worked extremely well for computers using 802.11(Ethernet).


19 posted on 11/20/2010 8:30:41 AM PST by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

You must be too young to remember Arcnet and Token-Ring. You may not remember Betamax either.


20 posted on 11/20/2010 8:36:44 AM PST by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson