Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

1982
SELF | NOV 28, 2010 | swampsniper

Posted on 11/28/2010 9:27:54 AM PST by SWAMPSNIPER

From the 1982 Sears catalog. A lot of this stuff is still around and still going strong, they really don't make them like they used to. I gave my 1983 Minolte XG-M a check last tonight, still in great shape, but I've worn out 3 digital cameras in the last 10 years. The XG-M was close to 300 bucks in 83 though, it would be expensive to make today

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket


TOPICS: Arts/Photography; History; Hobbies
KEYWORDS: 1982; camera; sears
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: abb

You got that right!


21 posted on 11/28/2010 1:27:35 PM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, A Matter Of Fact, Not A Matter Of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER
As a less than neophyte, I usually admire your photos and then sit back and listen to what the pros have to say.
Today I will say that I inherited an old German camera from my father. It is a Contax but I can not find anything that resembles a model # There is a number on the flash mount that says X 777 but that may be a serial number. Is this anything worthwhile? My dad said it was a fine camera made after the war and was popular then.
22 posted on 11/28/2010 1:29:49 PM PST by rightly_dividing (1 Cor. 15:1-4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red_Devil 232
Lots of good lenses still around for it. This is my baby, not quite as old, 1983.

MINOLTA XG-M, SIGMA 35-70

23 posted on 11/28/2010 1:30:16 PM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, A Matter Of Fact, Not A Matter Of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rightly_dividing

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contax


24 posted on 11/28/2010 1:35:44 PM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, A Matter Of Fact, Not A Matter Of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

Thanks, I was just looking at some sites about Contax as you posted.


25 posted on 11/28/2010 1:39:52 PM PST by rightly_dividing (1 Cor. 15:1-4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: 6SJ7
Just googled and found people have uploaded images of various past Sears catalog "Wish Books". Here is the 1980 version. Cool.

Interesting!

Here's a TV from that catalog:

That $669.95 would cost about $1778 today -about the same as a reasonably nice 50" HDTV. Of course, this Sears model would've been considered a very good TV as well back in 1980.

26 posted on 11/28/2010 1:51:57 PM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: abb
You don't lose many arguments, do you?

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

27 posted on 11/28/2010 4:02:44 PM PST by Cyber Ninja (Live and Let Live; is not working...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: meyer; SWAMPSNIPER

I had the pre-AE series Canons from 1967 to 1982: An FX and an FTbN.

While attending a convention in Manhattan in 1979, I walked into a camera store on or near 47th st. The Canon A-1 had been on my mind because it seemed to be a logical follow-on for me and the F series I already owned. I played with the A-1, and asked the young salesman how much. He said “X dollars” (I have long forgotten what X was). I said, “OK, here’s my MasterCard.” He took it back to the cash register and had a whispered conversation with a senior employee, maybe the manager.

He came back to me, all apologetic-like, and said, “I’m awful sorry—I made a mistake. My boss just told me that we can’t sell you this camera at anything less than (X+30) dollars.” I thought about it a moment and reached over the counter to snatch my credit card back, while saying “No thanks. Have a good day.” I turned away and walked straight out the door. I heard the sales guy call after me, but I couldn’t make out what he said. I was already at the door and didn’t look back.

Kept the F-series Canons for about 3 more years before selling them for two Olympus OM2ns and a Mamyia C330. These were all stolen a few years later.

After going without reflex cameras for a decade, I finally got back into them with the Canon EOS line, which coincidentally had been introduced the same year my Olympi and Mamiya were stolen. 2 film EOSes and 2 digital EOSes later, I’m still with that system.

Postscript: At the gun show today, a guy had a couple of old folding cameras, and also an Argus C3 with a bunch of lenses and other accessories. I had taken my first 35mm pix with my dad’s C3. If I hadn’t found a good C3 specimen on the web a year ago, I would have made the guy an offer.


28 posted on 11/28/2010 6:50:32 PM PST by Erasmus (Personal goal: Have a bigger carbon footprint than Tony Robbins.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Red_Devil 232

A good friend of mine had an SRT-101 kit stolen by baggage handlers on a flight from Phoenix to Chicago. The airline, of course, offered him about fifty cents.

A great lesson I learned from that, and a rule I’ve follwed for forty years since: Don’t check yer cameras with the friggin’ airlines!!!

Anyway, he replaced the Minolta with a Nikkormat exactly like yours.


29 posted on 11/28/2010 6:56:48 PM PST by Erasmus (Personal goal: Have a bigger carbon footprint than Tony Robbins.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Erasmus

Post-post-script: There was a roll of Kodachrome 64 in that C3 when I got it, run almost completely through. Last week I mailed the roll off to Dwayne’s lab; it’ll be interesting what, if anything comes of those slides.

For those who don’t know, Dwayne’s photo service is the last remaining lab for Kodak-process slide film, and they’re shutting down that process at the end of the year.


30 posted on 11/28/2010 7:07:42 PM PST by Erasmus (Personal goal: Have a bigger carbon footprint than Tony Robbins.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Erasmus

47th St. is famous for bait and switch and all kinds of flimflam.


31 posted on 11/28/2010 7:25:13 PM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, A Matter Of Fact, Not A Matter Of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Erasmus
The FT QL, front view cropped a little too tight...

I was using the image to demonstrate aperture to somebody a couple of years ago. Here's the "stopped down" image for the uninitiated...

I "bought" (for a very small fee) the FT from my father around 1976 or so, after I got my first job. I shot many rolls of film through that camera. Mechanically, it still works fine. Can't get the mercury batteries any more, but you can get a reasonable facsimile (supposedly) to supply the meter.

32 posted on 11/28/2010 7:33:39 PM PST by meyer (Hey Obama - It's the end of the world as you know it.... ..... and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER
Check out the cool stuff in the Sears catalog from 1973!
33 posted on 11/28/2010 7:39:49 PM PST by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qam1; ItsOurTimeNow; PresbyRev; Fraulein; StoneColdGOP; Clemenza; m18436572; InShanghai; xrp; ...
Late night,

Xer Ping

Ping list for the discussion of the politics and social (and sometimes nostalgic) aspects that directly effects Generation Reagan / Generation-X (Those born from 1965-1981) including all the spending previous generations are doing that Gen-X and Y will end up paying for.

Freep mail me to be added or dropped. See my home page for details and previous articles.  

34 posted on 11/28/2010 9:51:19 PM PST by qam1 (There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Disambiguator

I went to your link, was that David Bowie?


35 posted on 11/28/2010 11:47:45 PM PST by SamAdams76 (I am 5 days away from outliving Curly Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Disambiguator

Nice, Lileks.


36 posted on 11/29/2010 12:14:31 AM PST by LayoutGuru2 (0BAMAC0RN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76; Disambiguator

Bad Photoshop


37 posted on 11/29/2010 4:46:24 AM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: meyer

Boy, that FT and lens look immaculate.

I think that when you get the replacement adapters (using, I think silver oxide cells), on some cameras it’s best to recalibrate the meter due to slight difference in the operating voltage.


38 posted on 12/04/2010 3:51:43 PM PST by Erasmus (Personal goal: Have a bigger carbon footprint than Tony Robbins.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson