Posted on 03/07/2011 1:44:47 PM PST by wendy1946
That appears to be a false color photo of a galaxy and its associated dust cloud.
It is really difficult to tell with this false color photograph which is apparently a layered Multi-photo of dust clouds associated with the galaxy as well the galaxy itself. A number of photographs at different wavelengths would be far easier answer.
By the way, many galaxies have tails. They shoot matter out of their center at high speeds. All of the tails are nearly transparent because there is really very little matter being shot out of the galaxy.
You're arguing from a premise that all the evidence we have is all there is, and all there will ever be. How smart is that?
If it’s on u tube...well, that’s all I need!
The recently “validated” inflation theory seems to be in concert with the biblical account of the creation.
It one of many hypothetical constructs in cosmology.
Plasma cosmology theory also postulates that the main thing which agglomerates plasma form material into solid things is the Z-pinch force associated with Birkeland currents and that is basically why you see things like strings of galaxies.
Skip Arp’s work has done nothing of the sort. It is just another theory among many.
Its “Snap Your Finger Time”!!!!!!
You might want to review the writings of Gerald Schroedershalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach
Unless perhaps, at the point of singularity, it disappeared to emerge into a new universe. "Turned inside-out," so to speak.
As for your gorilla example, show me a gorilla species that makes fire and buries it's dead.
i copied it I hope you don't mind?
I don’t mind. It’s not mine. I just got it off of photobucket. :-)
What is the nothingness in space between the galaxies. Is it really nothing or is it something? Like maybe the very same stuff in the rest of the universe, it just never clumped to form matter as we know it. Is there nothing anywhere?
ALL of that is wrong, not just part of it.
Some people believe that a neutrino soup of sorts prevails even in the emptiest space although I don't see how anybody could hope to prove that.
Way upwards of 99% of the mass of the universe is in plasma form and the main thing which aggregates plasma into solid things like galaxies and stars and planets is the Z-Pinch effect which is associated with the cosmic Birkeland currents which move through plasmas. That is why you find strings of galaxies and why, as Peratt and Lerner note in the video, solid material in the universe is "clumpy" beyond what could be explained by "big bang". Certainly the big bang offers no way to picture strings of galaxies forming.
So, the universe never began, but it is dying? I haven’t watched the videos yet, but maybe you could give me a brief synopsis of their view of whether the universe is dying (going toward a uniform very cold temperature). Or is it recreating itself in places? Is there a reverse entropy engine somewhere?
Big bang does not pass any sort of a sniff test for basic logic. Having all the mass of the universe collapsed to a point would be the ultimate black hole; nothing would ever "bang" its way out of that. Likewise it is nonsensical to think that a supposedly omnipotent and omniscient God would suddenly figure out that it would be a cool thing to do to create a universe while the idea had never occurred to him previously; whether that supposedly happened 6000 or 17B years ago doesn't even matter, it's nonsensical either way.
In other words, big bang is bad physics, bad logic, and bad theology rolled up into a package.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.