Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

rrogance proves insufficient argument in ObamaCare debate
DavidRivkin.com, The Wall Street Journal ^ | 03/15/11 | Ed Hassell

Posted on 03/15/2011 9:52:07 AM PDT by T.Bourne

In a court of law, there are always clear differences between a political argument and one based on sound legal reasoning.

If you need a prime example of the disconnect between the two, you should have been at the public Oxford-style debate held by the Brookings Institution in Washington, D.C. on March 2. The debate centered on the constitutionality of the health care law’s individual mandate—specifically arguing the ruling passed down by two federal judges already that the mandate to purchase insurance is unconstitutional.

Arguing the unconstitutionality of the law was the lead outside counsel from the Florida ruling (which threw out ObamaCare entirely) David B. Rivkin Jr., who successfully represented 26 plaintiff states and the National Federation of Independent Business. He was joined by Ilya Somin, an assistant professor of law at the George Mason University School of Law. Arguing for the mandate’s constitutionality were Walter Dellinger, a former solicitor general in the Clinton administration, and Simon Lazarus, public policy counsel for the National Senior Citizens Law Center.

(Excerpt) Read more at davidrivkin.com ...


TOPICS: Education; Health/Medicine; Reference; Society
KEYWORDS: argument; arrogance; constitution; debate; healthcare; individualmandate; obamacare; ppaca
Repeal, repeal, repeal.
1 posted on 03/15/2011 9:52:13 AM PDT by T.Bourne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: T.Bourne

You can click the “report abuse” button to have your title repaired.


2 posted on 03/15/2011 9:59:50 AM PDT by houeto (Government derives its just powers from the consent of the governed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T.Bourne

So that famous barrister, R. Rogance, Esq., was associate counsel for the plaintiffs?


3 posted on 03/15/2011 10:17:08 AM PDT by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T.Bourne

I don’t believe that the SC will rule on this based on law.

The SC will not void the (unconstitutional) law since it will not want to cause the disruption sure to follow because DeathCare is so firmly entrenched by that time. The Dems are betting on that, and IMO it’s a smart bet for them.

The only thing that will stop this is rebellion. Which I don’t believe will happen. The Republicans are already abandoning the pretense of wanting to repeal it. Not all of them course, but enough.


4 posted on 03/15/2011 10:18:39 AM PDT by ChildOfThe60s ( If you can remember the 60s....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: houeto; T.Bourne

I dunno, I think we’ve just seen a new FR term coined.
Rrogance, worse than standard arrogance, arrogance with a sense of entitlement and tyranny.


5 posted on 03/15/2011 10:18:39 AM PDT by Darksheare (Dear Interdimensional Monstrosity, I fear our relationship has taken a turn for the worse...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: T.Bourne

“...We have to pass the bill so you can find out what is in it...”

Send your “Thank You, BotoxIdiot” cards to Nancy Pelosi, kkthx. =.=


6 posted on 03/15/2011 10:21:43 AM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T.Bourne
This is hugh and series!!!!!
7 posted on 03/15/2011 10:53:48 AM PDT by starlifter (Pullum sapit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
Rrogance, worse than standard arrogance, arrogance with a sense of entitlement and tyranny.

Like, "Arrogance diminishes wisdom." "Rrogance destroys it!"

8 posted on 03/15/2011 10:54:24 AM PDT by houeto (Government derives its just powers from the consent of the governed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: houeto

Yes, obliterates and opposes wisdom.


9 posted on 03/15/2011 11:14:25 AM PDT by Darksheare (Dear Interdimensional Monstrosity, I fear our relationship has taken a turn for the worse...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson