Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Solar Product Captures Up to 95 Percent of Light Energy
MU News Bureau ^ | 5/16/11 | Steven Adams

Posted on 05/17/2011 9:36:31 AM PDT by dangerdoc

COLUMBIA, Mo. – Efficiency is a problem with today’s solar panels; they only collect about 20 percent of available light. Now, a University of Missouri engineer has developed a flexible solar sheet that captures more than 90 percent of available light, and he plans to make prototypes available to consumers within the next five years.

Patrick Pinhero, an associate professor in the MU Chemical Engineering Department, is developing a flexible solar sheet that captures more than 90 percent of available light. Today’s solar panels only collect 20 percent of available light. Patrick Pinhero, an associate professor in the MU Chemical Engineering Department, says energy generated using traditional photovoltaic (PV) methods of solar collection is inefficient and neglects much of the available solar electromagnetic (sunlight) spectrum. The device his team has developed – essentially a thin, moldable sheet of small antennas called nantenna – can harvest the heat from industrial processes and convert it into usable electricity. Their ambition is to extend this concept to a direct solar facing nantenna device capable of collecting solar irradiation in the near infrared and optical regions of the solar spectrum.

Working with his former team at the Idaho National Laboratory and Garrett Moddel, an electrical engineering professor at the University of Colorado, Pinhero and his team have now developed a way to extract electricity from the collected heat and sunlight using special high-speed electrical circuitry. This team also partners with Dennis Slafer of MicroContinuum, Inc., of Cambridge, Mass., to immediately port laboratory bench-scale technologies into manufacturable devices that can be inexpensively mass-produced.

“Our overall goal is to collect and utilize as much solar energy as is theoretically possible and bring it to the commercial market in an inexpensive package that is accessible to everyone,” Pinhero said. “If successful, this product will put us orders of magnitudes ahead of the current solar energy technologies we have available to us today.”

As part of a rollout plan, the team is securing funding from the U.S. Department of Energy and private investors. The second phase features an energy-harvesting device for existing industrial infrastructure, including heat-process factories and solar farms.

Within five years, the research team believes they will have a product that complements conventional PV solar panels. Because it’s a flexible film, Pinhero believes it could be incorporated into roof shingle products, or be custom-made to power vehicles.

Once the funding is secure, Pinhero envisions several commercial product spin-offs, including infrared (IR) detection. These include improved contraband-identifying products for airports and the military, optical computing, and infrared line-of-sight telecommunications.


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: solar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

1 posted on 05/17/2011 9:36:35 AM PDT by dangerdoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

Awesome! If true I’d finally be able to get off the grid and actually afford it.


2 posted on 05/17/2011 9:38:54 AM PDT by Peter from Rutland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

If solar panels were inexpensive, they would have been huge sellers by now. Not just among the hippies, but also among real, non-smelly people that just want to save a buck or two rather than pay it to the electric company.

5 years though? Heck, I’d like it on my roof tomorrow.


3 posted on 05/17/2011 9:40:21 AM PDT by Grunthor (RIDE THE CAIN TRAIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

Efficiency is a major part of the problem with solar. If true this would be good news.


4 posted on 05/17/2011 9:41:45 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

To quote Nigel Tufnel:

“It’s like, how much more black could this be? and the answer is none. None more black.”


5 posted on 05/17/2011 9:43:28 AM PDT by Jack of all Trades (Hold your face to the light, even though for the moment you do not see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

i hope this is not more empty promises. I’ve have seen so many of this type of articles that end no where.


6 posted on 05/17/2011 9:45:38 AM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
The two other major issues are storage for when the sun goes down and areas of the Country that may not have the greatest quality of sunlight to begin with. Like us folks up here in Minnesota with our 6 months+ winters.

As an augment, it'd be nice. It still wouldn't beat a footlocker size reactor in my backyard putting out enough power to run my entire households electrical needs for the next 30 years...

7 posted on 05/17/2011 9:46:05 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (explosive bolts, ten thousand volts at a million miles an hour)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

surely they should be able to give us a demonstration of this tech on their prototype right now, right?


8 posted on 05/17/2011 9:47:47 AM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc
Of course, there will be no environmental impact when entire regions are shaded by solar panels.

It's a good thing wildlife and plants don't require sunlight, or it might be a problem.

9 posted on 05/17/2011 9:48:45 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islamophobia: The fear of offending Muslims because they are prone to violence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

usually this type of articles are just plea for more funding. And then when someone dumb enough do fund this project, its end up not as promised and the investor pull out, then the environmental community cry conspiracy by evil rich ppl and big oil companies against solar energy


10 posted on 05/17/2011 9:50:28 AM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc
I call BS based on this from the article:

Within five years, the research team believes they will have a product that complements conventional PV solar panels.

This is weasel-wording, pure and simple. If his technology is nearly 5 times as efficient, and as the article says can be cheaply manufactured, then there is no need for convential PV panels anymore, they are totally obsolete. So why would he say his project "complements" them?

Read between the lines and you can learn a lot of what is not being said here. That quote tells me there is some fatal flaw with this technology and the article is not revealing that flaw.

11 posted on 05/17/2011 9:51:34 AM PDT by drangundsturm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
The two other major issues are storage for when the sun goes down and areas of the Country that may not have the greatest quality of sunlight to begin with. Like us folks up here in Minnesota with our 6 months+ winters.

True enough but with 90% efficiency I suspect there would be a fair amount of power generated even on overcast days.

I'm with with you on the backyard nuke.
12 posted on 05/17/2011 9:52:29 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane
“As part of a rollout plan, the team is securing funding from the U.S. Department of Energy and private investors.”

This should be enough of a clue that it's a scam.

13 posted on 05/17/2011 9:54:25 AM PDT by bitterohiogunclinger (Proudly casting a heavy carbon footprint as I clean my guns ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

That’s what I thought.


14 posted on 05/17/2011 9:59:25 AM PDT by dangerdoc (see post #6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jack of all Trades

????


15 posted on 05/17/2011 10:00:15 AM PDT by dangerdoc (see post #6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

Capturing the light and then converting it to energy are two different things, unless the the tech is there to convert the energy then this can only complement existing tech.


16 posted on 05/17/2011 10:01:27 AM PDT by Stardust558
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc; All
Whew!!! Just in time!!! Barry was just about gonna have to start drillin' here at home!!!!!


17 posted on 05/17/2011 10:02:02 AM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

Anyone remember the 320 MPG promotion of GM electric car? I was so excited when I heard about it. This was only a few years ago. Now look at it now. The car is a total junk. Their 320 MPG was exaggerated and the car too expensive and they don’t last long before you have to switch out for another expensive battery


18 posted on 05/17/2011 10:02:31 AM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

“Once the funding is secure, ...”

As I suspected


19 posted on 05/17/2011 10:03:36 AM PDT by WorkerbeeCitizen (I've got that freshly screwed feeling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangerdoc

Here’s an actual engineering paper on the topic:

http://www.inl.gov/pdfs/nantenna.pdf


20 posted on 05/17/2011 10:06:20 AM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson