Government agents, knocking on the doors of law-abiding citizens, forcing them to give up their dogs to be euthanized? That doesn't sound too conservative to me. Let me guess? I'm from the government and I'm here to help. It's for the children.
Assault rifles, assault dogs...what’s in a name?
Kneel before ZOD, Citizen!
Maybe the big fear is that when the Feds come to bust down your door and take your guns, some of those ‘killer dogs” might greet them on the lawn.
Can’t have your home being defended against such things, now can we?
Get a little kitty cat or a hamster.
It’s still something to pet and no threat to the gubmint.
No, more akin to people with common sense deciding
that people should not be able to keep lions in their
yards because the danger to the public cancels the
right of anyone to keep a dangerous predator as a pet.
Unpredictable predatory animals do not make good pets.
It’s just that simple. Be they lions or pit bull canines.
Kick in the door and tazer the children! It’s for the children!!!!
People who make excuses for government intrusion into our lives tend to be all for government interfering in ‘some other guys’ life instead of their own.
Yeah, confiscating and forcibly euthanizing animals by government fiat doesn’t sound conservative to me either.
According to New York state my previous cat [d. 1999] was an ‘illegal F1 feral’ and if she’d been recognized as what she was the state would have confiscated her, euthanized her and then billed me for the privilege of having the state kill my pet.
And then charge me for the crime of having a cat give birth to domestic bobcat crossbreeds on my back porch.
All of this in the name of protecting the populace from the menace of a ‘dangerous feral animal’.
The only danger this cat posed was if you were a mouse or bird.
Somebody once said something about a slippery slope.
Oh, that may be the bst post I’ve ever seen in a pit thread. Nicely done!