Posted on 07/17/2011 3:00:13 PM PDT by decimon
Credit: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Usage Restrictions: None
Watts happening ping.
Emirel LaGasse.
He keeps the earth cooking.
And who hung a nuclear device 93 million miles out in space from schools and hospitals fer cryin’ out loud??? Didja ever see the size of that thing????
Don’t forget, that thing is not shielded!
Colossians 1:17And He is before all things and in Him all things hold together.
My guess is HOT AIR from DC is funneled into the core.
What about all the kinetic energy involved when a mass the size of Earth rotates around its axis and simultaneously is rotating around both the Sun, our galaxy and whatever galactic super-cluster we are a part of?.
Calling Mr. Hoagland. Hyperdemsional physics anybody?.
Yea, that too. Where the heck is the EPA?? Why haven’t they shut that thing down???
Wow! Heavy stuff.
Does Algore’s Nobel prize enable him to understand this stuff, or is he more baffled than I am??
*sheesh*
It’s still cooking because HE Said it WILL!
Science is OK, but one has to blend it with the teachings of The Giver of All Science.
That huge hole in the picture seems to be centered at California. That’s about the right size of a hole for the state budget....
The greenies won't let us use it, then.
Neither Earth’s rotation nor the periodic bending/warping of Earth’s crust by the Moon is not even close enough to raise Earth’s core to any more than 20 degrees Celcius.
The story of the discovery of radioactivity starts with - of all things - Darwin’s book: On the origin of Species (published in 1859). Darwin understood that evolution takes a very long time and he needed to support the evolution theory by showing that Earth is old enough to bring about life and evolution. Darwin assumed an erosion rate of an inch a century, and then extrapolated that some 300 million years were apparently necessary to explain the total amount of erosion that had occurred.
In 1862, Lord Kelvin published his analysis in a paper titled On the Secular Cooling of the Earth. He arrived at a best estimate for the age of the Earth of 100 million years. Essentially, Lord Kelvin stated that if Earth is more than 100 million years old, there would be no volcanic activity (tidal forces would be unsufficiant) and the planet would be totally solid to the core.
The Christian Fundamentalists were in an uproar against Darwin and held up Lord Kelvin’s study to show that Darwin is incorrect. However, the sedimentation record of the Grand Canyon implies that Earth is at least 2 billion years old. Other studies concluded that Earth is much younger than 1 billion years old. There was much acrimony in the scientific world. It came to the point that Lord Kelvin stated that if one can discover an unknown - at that time - source of energy then he will acknowledge that his models were wrong.
Then in 1896, Henri Becquerel accidentally discovered radioactivity.
I learn the above story by reading 20 years ago a science book published before WW2. Today, all science textbooks start the radioactivity story with Becquerel.
You can read more about the radioactivity story at www.lewrockwell.com/orig9/deming4.1.1.html
Depends on who is doing the implying and how/why they interpreted facts and also whether they interpreted their "facts" based upon other mere implications thought to be facts but based upon other implications often based upon outdated science.
I know you are trying to be witty but you have failed miserably. At least 3 Nobel prizes (chemistry, physics, medicine) were award for work on sedimentation. The relevant researcher is The Svedberg, 1926 Chemistry Nobel prize.
However, The did not do the Grand Canyon work but his predecessors in the field of sedimentation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
