Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The War On Drugs
Self ^ | August 4 2011 | He Rides A White Horse

Posted on 08/05/2011 3:16:16 PM PDT by He Rides A White Horse

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121 next last
To: Dead Corpse
but then advocate several positions...

Which positions are you referring to?

101 posted on 08/09/2011 1:57:32 PM PDT by death2tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: RowdyFFC
So you'd be ok with them fighting a war on guns then...

Moron...

102 posted on 08/09/2011 1:59:38 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (For those who fight for it, life has a flavor the sheltered will never know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: death2tyrants
Your desire to continue to tell others what to do with their lives for starters.

You'd rather give the government power than allow people to suffer the consequences of their actions.

Sorry, but that is not "conservative" by any stretch of the imagination.

Here's the Conservative way to do this, "We are going to pass an Amendment outlawing the production, sale, and use of a xxx types of drugs. This will give the FedGov the legal authority to run a 'war' on drugs."

Absent that, you are no better than a Democrat.

103 posted on 08/09/2011 2:11:11 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (For those who fight for it, life has a flavor the sheltered will never know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

You figure it out...I suspect the war on guns is going to be fought and it’s not going to have anything to do with the US congress, but the executive branch.


104 posted on 08/09/2011 2:17:19 PM PDT by RowdyFFC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: RowdyFFC
I have "figured it out". When you've been here as long as I have, you might "figure it out" as well.

And no... All of the current gun control proposals all mirror the drug statutes and even use drug case law to prop them up in courts.

105 posted on 08/09/2011 2:19:58 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (For those who fight for it, life has a flavor the sheltered will never know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

Since the War on Poverty was not a war at all, maybe you need to come up with some other attack.


106 posted on 08/09/2011 2:20:22 PM PDT by RowdyFFC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

Been here as long as you have? lol Your logic again assumes a lot.


107 posted on 08/09/2011 2:23:15 PM PDT by RowdyFFC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: RowdyFFC
Since the War on Poverty was not a war at all, maybe you need to come up with some other attack.

The CSA didn't come with a declaration of war that I recall. Or is this one of those "it's a war when I say it is" kind of deals?

108 posted on 08/09/2011 2:25:51 PM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

I stated that I oppose the legalization of drugs, prostitution, and gay marriage. Which ones of these do you support?


109 posted on 08/09/2011 2:32:28 PM PDT by death2tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

The CSA? Which CSA would that be? Confederate State of America, Child Support Agency, Community Supported Agriculture? What, what, what?


110 posted on 08/09/2011 2:40:02 PM PDT by RowdyFFC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: RowdyFFC
The CSA? Which CSA would that be? Confederate State of America, Child Support Agency, Community Supported Agriculture? What, what, what?

I figured you knew the history and background of the issue well enough to associate "CSA" with the Controlled Substances Act in a "drug war" thread.

Do we need to explain Wickard v Filburn, too?

111 posted on 08/09/2011 2:44:44 PM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

We’ve had controlled substances acts since 1914 you’re just a little bit LATE pulling your drawers up and objecting to it. What are you on? Crack or wacky weed? Which one do you want to make legal?


112 posted on 08/09/2011 4:10:33 PM PDT by RowdyFFC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: RowdyFFC

Is insults all you know, or can you put them aside long enough to try and comprehend the signicance of the New Deal Commerce Clause, and it’s consequences. Are you capable of doing that?


113 posted on 08/09/2011 4:35:37 PM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

Sir, with all due respect, there’s not going to be any argument that you can make to me that’s going to make me believe that legalizing street drugs in the US is a wise choice.

NOW, if you want to believe that putting a little street drug market on the corner in every community, and taxing it, and checking ID’s is going to solve the drug hog problem that we have in the US you go right ahead.

The problem is DRUG ADDICTION, the problem is not outlawing drugs. Can you grab your drawers and understand that concept?

NOW, we’ve a serious problem with alcohol addiction on this planet for years. And in this country. We took steps to prohibit the sale of it and it failed, BECAUSE so many were already addicted to it. So, alcohol became legal again and we STILL have people dying from drunks grabbing guns and shooting people and drunks on the highways causing 37% of deaths in this country.

NOW, did making alcohol legal again solve any problem whatsoever with alcohol addiction? NO, it didn’t!

Neither will making street drugs legal solve one damned thing about the current horrific street drug addictions in this country...or anywhere else. Even the Netherlands has finally figured this out and making drugs illegal.


114 posted on 08/09/2011 4:55:05 PM PDT by RowdyFFC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: RowdyFFC
I'm not trying to make you believe that legalizing street drugs is a wise choice. I'm trying to make you understand that it's not a choice between giving absolute control to a federal bureaucracy and not having any control at all.

The "war on drugs" is screwed up because it's another example of the federal government assuming control of something it was never granted or intended to have control of.

115 posted on 08/09/2011 5:05:07 PM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

OK, so I agree with you that getting rid of the DEA is a tremendously good idea. They’re useless bureaucrats. And we have plenty of local law enforcement that’s answerable to local citizens.

As for outlawing street drugs, I don’t care whether it’s the feds or local law that makes them illegal, either one will do. Just so our law enforcement can arrest these thugs trying to sell our children street drugs and get them addicted to it.


116 posted on 08/09/2011 5:40:14 PM PDT by RowdyFFC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: RowdyFFC

Your “logic” is completely missing...


117 posted on 08/09/2011 6:12:53 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (For those who fight for it, life has a flavor the sheltered will never know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: death2tyrants
I oppose using unConstitutional laws to fight a "war" to protect people from themselves. I oppose those who would use the force of law to redefine marriage or those looking for special "favors" from government for their religions marriage statutes. I oppose anyone who would impose their religion at the point of a government gun.

I am a man of faith. My faith lies with my God and I do not trust men to rule on Earth in His stead. Period.

118 posted on 08/09/2011 6:17:03 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (For those who fight for it, life has a flavor the sheltered will never know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

Go away child...my logic is just fine...and I know there’s no use beating a dead horse...scat!


119 posted on 08/09/2011 6:28:17 PM PDT by RowdyFFC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: RowdyFFC
horse...scat!

Sums up your posts so far perfectly. Horsesh*t...

120 posted on 08/10/2011 4:04:12 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (For those who fight for it, life has a flavor the sheltered will never know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson