Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DARPA's Maple leaf Remote Control drone takes first flight (video)
Engadget ^ | 8/11/11 | Lydia Leavitt

Posted on 08/14/2011 6:32:20 AM PDT by LibWhacker

After five years behind locked doors, researchers at Lockheed Martin's Intelligent Robotics Laboratories in New Jersey have emerged with a working prototype of the "Samarai," a tiny DARPA-commissioned surveillance drone. The nano air vehicles (NAVs), modeled after falling Maple leaf seeds, are designed to be super light weight and agile for vertical lift off, hovering, and navigation in tight spaces. Like your favorite $5 Subway sammie, these surveillance bots are a foot long, but instead of being shoveled in your mouth, they're thrown like boomerangs into flight and controlled using a tablet app or a basic remote. These eyes in the sky will officially launch next week at the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International Conference, but until then you can check out the video of their first flight below.

Update: Lockheed Martin wrote in to let us know that although originally commissioned by DARPA, this project is currently funded internally. Lockheed also noted that the flight recorded in the video is only a test flight, rather than a first flight for the Samarai.


TOPICS: Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: darpa; drone; leaf; maple; samarai; uav
Video here
1 posted on 08/14/2011 6:32:34 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Maybe it is a prototype issue, but it does seem to be very noisy for a surveillance device.


2 posted on 08/14/2011 6:40:31 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

In those confined spaces it makes quite a bit of noise, but probably wouldn’t be that noticeable out in the open or in a city where there is already so much noise.


3 posted on 08/14/2011 6:44:17 AM PDT by Roses0508
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

It appears, if my memory is still intact, that `Popular Electronics` came out with plans for this design 40(?) years ago, but not remote control.


4 posted on 08/14/2011 6:54:46 AM PDT by bunkerhill7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

If surveillance is confined to a hydroelectric plant it’d be a piece of cake.


5 posted on 08/14/2011 7:01:26 AM PDT by Rudder (The Main Stream Media is Our Enemy---get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

A different video
World’s first controllable MAV monocopter, Robotic Samara (maple seed)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u23Hqq8QbeE&feature=player_embedded#at=26


6 posted on 08/14/2011 7:02:48 AM PDT by Bobalu (He who is compassionate to the cruel will ultimately become cruel to the compassionate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

That thing is too noisy and unstable compared to common battery powered remote control helicopters available at many hobby stores.

http://heli-world.com/

http://www.alibaba.com/showroom/rc-helicopter-hobby-battery.html

http://www.lancealbertson.com/2011/01/diving-into-a-new-hobby-with-rc-helicopters/


7 posted on 08/14/2011 7:18:37 AM PDT by CharlyFord (t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks LibWhacker.


8 posted on 08/14/2011 7:50:11 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Yes, as a matter of fact, it is that time again -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7

I believe there is a problem of precession control. It’s like the boomerang except that the counter torquing is not done over a large path but inside a tight spiral held down in part by the inertia of the center core.


9 posted on 08/14/2011 7:59:49 AM PDT by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Cool, but what advantage does it provide over a conventional helicopter ROV. As one of the poster on the YouTube put it the thing flys like a one winged duck on meth. An RC helicopter would appear to give better performance without the extra development cost. So what am I missing.
10 posted on 08/14/2011 8:04:26 AM PDT by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoGOP

“So what am I missing. “

A paycheck from Lockheed?


11 posted on 08/14/2011 8:14:29 AM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
More specifically, a paycheck from Lockheed, in New Jersey paid for by the American tax payers, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). It's another example of wealth transfer.

I have some friends, that lives in Maryland, that combined remote control helicopters with cameras from broken camcorders and TV rabbit transmitters over 20 years ago. They learned to fly them quiet well from their TV receivers. It was a hobby.

This project is a fine example of why our Country is so deep in debt.

I have no problem with financing military hardware development but too many of these projects are just stupid excuses to spend Government money.

12 posted on 08/14/2011 9:20:00 AM PDT by CharlyFord (t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CharlyFord

Yes the wealth is transferred back into our economy.


13 posted on 08/14/2011 9:31:59 AM PDT by Kirkwood (Zombie Hunter Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: CharlyFord

It’s research. It may look stupid but I was thinking if you enlarged it so that it was 60-70 ft and were able to generate lift comparable to a helicopter ........ Well then you might have a vertical lift vehicle without a tail rotor Or fear of the Jesus bolt failing or two big propellers rotating.

I’d rather waste money on DARPA than beer, pot, television cable service and cell phone for the parasites and feral youths wandering our country.


14 posted on 08/14/2011 9:41:21 AM PDT by Dick Vomer (democrats are like flies, whatever they don't eat, they sh#t on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kirkwood
Yes the wealth is transferred back into our economy.

The wealth is transferred back into the economy of the constituents that financially supported or voted for the Congress critter that sponsored the contract or grant in the first place. It's political corruption!

I know because I worked in the industry.

15 posted on 08/14/2011 10:56:31 AM PDT by CharlyFord (t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dick Vomer
I’d rather waste money on DARPA than beer, pot, television cable service and cell phone for the parasites and feral youths wandering our country.

Me too! But I'd prefer that the money spent on DARPA be used for research and development instead of pork barrel projects.

16 posted on 08/14/2011 11:05:40 AM PDT by CharlyFord (t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
I can't imagine that thing taking any useful photos since the whole device is spinning.

Of course that gets them the other bazillion bucks to develop a super spin stabilized boomerang camera.

I agree that my RC copter is a better choice. It can fly through doorways,land in a circle AND carry an of the shelf
wireless video camera.

17 posted on 08/14/2011 11:44:59 AM PDT by WePledge (Ich werde fur immer ein Hollenhund werden. Semper Fidelis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WePledge

oops of= off


18 posted on 08/14/2011 11:46:35 AM PDT by WePledge (Ich werde fur immer ein Hollenhund werden. Semper Fidelis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Samn, that thing makes a lot of noise.


19 posted on 08/14/2011 11:54:54 AM PDT by max americana (FUBO NATION 2012 FK BARAK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson