Posted on 09/27/2011 6:34:46 PM PDT by Iam1ru1-2
Last week, the U.S. House Workforce Committee held a hearing on the Obama Labor Board's recent onslaught of Big Labor power grabs that undermine worker freedom.
National Labor Relations Board Chairman and former union lawyer Mark Pearce offered his spin after the hearing, calling the Board's decisions "fair and even-handed."
The outrageous complaint against Boeing hardly seems fair to the thousands of South Carolina workers who could be forced out of their jobs all because they can't be required to pay union dues or "fees" as a condition of employment.
But don't just take my word for it.
At the hearing, an individual employee victimized by one recent NLRB decision stood up and made her voice heard.
On July 22, Barbara Ivey learned the radical Service Employees International Union (SEIU) was launching a campaign to unionize her workplace.
Thirteen days later, her employer, Kaiser Permanente, announced that it was recognizing the union as the monopoly bargaining agent of all workers in the unit.
There was no secret ballot vote. No one from the SEIU ever contacted Ivey about whether or not she wanted to join or support the union.
Other workers told Ivey they felt pressured to sign so-called "union authorization cards."
But Kaiser Permanente agreed to recognize the union through the abusive card check process, and the workers faced an uphill battle to exercise their rights.
Relying on the National Right to Work Foundation-won Dana precedent, Ivey utilized the only means left at her disposal. She asked her coworkers to sign a petition demanding a secret ballot vote.
By August 8, Ivey turned in a petition supported by 45 percent of her coworkers to request a decertification election. The NLRB set a private vote for September 20.
But before that vote could occur, the Board overturned Dana, canceling the election.
Barbara Ivey and her coworkers must now wait one to four years to request a new decertification election.
Ivey told the U.S. House panel, "For me and my fellow employees however, snatching away those rights just as an election has been agreed to and a date had been set was cruel and unethical."
Read the rest of her testimony by clicking here.
I'm sure you'll agree there's nothing "fair and even-handed" about her story.
Sincerely,
Mark Mix National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation
P.S. The Foundation relies completely on voluntary contributions from its supporters to provide free legal aid.
If you can, please chip in with a tax-deductible contribution of $10 or more today to support the Foundation's programs.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation is a nonprofit, charitable organization providing free legal aid to employees whose human or civil rights have been violated by compulsory unionism abuses. The Foundation, which can be contacted toll-free at 1-800-336-3600, is assisting thousands of employees in nearly 200 cases nationwide. The Foundation's mailing address is 8001 Braddock Road, Springfield, Virginia 22160. Its web address is www.nrtw.org/.
bookmark
Thanks Iam1ru1-2.
Maybe they are saying if you can do it at Kaiser they will be able to pull the Same crap at Boeing
The headline says Boeing, but the story is about Kaiser Permanente.
Okay, where did this article come from? Did you just make it up? There is no live link to the source, and if one goes to the web site, this article and headline do not exist. I don’t like bully unions, but I also don’t like people who make up headlines and lie about stuff to make people scared or worried. So what’s going on here?
This guy Mark Mix is a jerk IMHO for sending out (what I suppose is) a fundraising email with a lie for a title.
Our freedom is gasping on life support.
On April 20, 2011, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued a complaint against Boeing because the company moved the second line of its production facilities for the new 787 Dreamliner from the Puget Sound area in Washington State to North Charleston, South Carolina.
One of the factors that contributed to Boeings decision was that its Washington production is interrupted every three to four years with union strikes and South Carolinas right-to-work laws create a more friendly business environment that ensures Boeing can meet its production goal of three Dreamliners per month. The NLRB claims that this decision discriminates against union workers and is trying to force Boeing to produce the airplanes in Washington.
NLRBs Actions Hurt the Economy
Boeing has already created more than 1,000 jobs and invested more than $2 billion in South Carolina. Forcing them to relocate the production facilities to Washington would hurt the South Carolina and national economy. In addition to its South Carolina hires, Boeing has expanded its workforce in the Washington facilities as well. Since 2009, when the company shifted the second line to South Carolina it has also added more than 2,000 jobs to its Puget Sound staff.
NLRBs Unconfirmed Board is Overreaching
The NLRB complaint was issued by Acting General Counsel Lafe Solomon, who has only recently been formally nominated to the position by President Obama. Solomons complaint comes at the behest of an NLRB board that is driven by unconfirmed, recess-appointed union lawyers. The board is currently an unbalanced 3-1 split with union lawyers dominating the panel. Craig Becker, who served as SEIU and AFL-CIO associate general counsel, and Mark Pearce are both extreme ideologues who could never pass muster in the Senate, so President Obama recess appointed them. Now theyre attacking Boeing for creating jobs in South Carolina. For more information on Obama skirting Congress to push his agenda: www.ObamaChart.com.
Companies Have a Right to Locate their Facilities Where they Choose
Twenty two states currently have right-to-work laws that allow individuals to decide for themselves whether they want to join a union, instead of being forced to turn over a portion of their paycheck to the unions even if they dont want to join. These 22 states consistently outperform the rest of the nation when it comes to economic growth and job creation. Right-to-work states boast have an unemployment rate below the national average. Companies want to create jobs in these states; the NLRB should not block job creation in states that established policies to attract work.
South Carolinas Right-to-Work: Boeing and the NLRB
On April 20, 2011, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued a complaint against Boeing because the company moved the second line of its production facilities for the new 787 Dreamliner from the Puget Sound area in Washington State to North Charleston, South Carolina.
One of the factors that contributed to Boeings decision was that its Washington production is interrupted every three to four years with union strikes and South Carolinas right-to-work laws create a more friendly business environment that ensures Boeing can meet its production goal of three Dreamliners per month. The NLRB claims that this decision discriminates against union workers and is trying to force Boeing to produce the airplanes in Washington.
NLRBs Actions Hurt the Economy
Boeing has already created more than 1,000 jobs and invested more than $2 billion in South Carolina. Forcing them to relocate the production facilities to Washington would hurt the South Carolina and national economy. In addition to its South Carolina hires, Boeing has expanded its workforce in the Washington facilities as well. Since 2009, when the company shifted the second line to South Carolina it has also added more than 2,000 jobs to its Puget Sound staff.
NLRBs Unconfirmed Board is Overreaching
The NLRB complaint was issued by Acting General Counsel Lafe Solomon, who has only recently been formally nominated to the position by President Obama. Solomons complaint comes at the behest of an NLRB board that is driven by unconfirmed, recess-appointed union lawyers. The board is currently an unbalanced 3-1 split with union lawyers dominating the panel. Craig Becker, who served as SEIU and AFL-CIO associate general counsel, and Mark Pearce are both extreme ideologues who could never pass muster in the Senate, so President Obama recess appointed them. Now theyre attacking Boeing for creating jobs in South Carolina. For more information on Obama skirting Congress to push his agenda: www.ObamaChart.com.
Companies Have a Right to Locate their Facilities Where they Choose
Twenty two states currently have right-to-work laws that allow individuals to decide for themselves whether they want to join a union, instead of being forced to turn over a portion of their paycheck to the unions even if they dont want to join. These 22 states consistently outperform the rest of the nation when it comes to economic growth and job creation. Right-to-work states boast have an unemployment rate below the national average. Companies want to create jobs in these states; the NLRB should not block job creation in states that established policies to attract work.
South Carolinas Right-to-Work: Boeing and the NLRB
Its time for the rise of anti-union unions. Workers can form a union based on the principle of cooperation with the employer and make no demands on the employer for wages benefits etc. They can have it in their by laws charge no dues.
True about the NLRB but Boeing already has a nonunion shop in South Carolina, the workers voted on it just over a year ago.
Excerpt:
Workers at Boeing's 787 fuselage assembly plant in Charleston, S.C. have decisively voted to get rid of the Machinists union as their bargaining representative with the company. The vote was 199 for decertification of the International Association of Machinists (IAM) union against 68 for retaining it.
That's what I said, and that's the very reason why the NLRB is trying to prevent Boeing from transferring work to SC, because the NLRB is a PRO-Union government agency.
Show me the head of a union that worked at the job his union represents.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.