Posted on 10/26/2011 7:30:09 AM PDT by ShadowAce
Likewise, a lot of the failings with IT sector patents are granted for failure to recognize prior art.
It is POSIX-compliant. Much different, though it makes the two systems look similar.
I don’t think patents are necessarily theft (though they can be). I just think they are pretty much unenforceable anymore unless you are a huge corporation. Building your business model solely on the hope of enforcing your patent is pretty risky.
How did you manage to pay $5K to the Patent Office?
Well understood but my point was if patents are theft what “crime” is it to intentionally deprive the world of ones discovery/development by keeping it a secret?
Ahh—gotcha. I totally misunderstood your post, then.
I didn;t the patent attorney did
Affordable, comprehensive and highly recommended book.
A "Preliminary Patent Application" gets you one year of "Patent Pending " protection an cost $75 last time I checked. Initial filing fee was about $750.
A patent attorney will charge you an bundle. You can either do your own online patent search, or hire a professional searcher for far less thatnthe attorney will charge you for the searchers fee.
Lots of "Patent it Yourself" software out there also.
the claims are the broad strokes of intellectual property
doin my own patent is like removing my own appendix myself
no chance
“I didn’t the patent attorney did”
Here is the Fee Schedule, in case you want to check your attorney’s itemized bill to you.
http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/qs/ope/fee092611.htm
Yeah, the source code is always the ultimate (excuse for not having) documentation. :)
But I meant more on the user or even integrator level.
I did some stuff a while back where we were constrainted to using libxml2.
The docs I could find for that were basically what were “auto produced” via probably source comments, etc.
And those (not the source code) necessarily give the full sense of what the “intended” behavior is.
Know what I mean?
So, may I ask, what propelled your effort? Do you also work in the field?
If you are trying to patent something in an obscure technical field, hiring some patent attorneys is like hiring a doctor of psychology to remove your appendix.
Semantics. POSIX wasn’t even a word when Linus started cloning UNIX. (1991<1997)
I had cool hardware that didn't have drivers. So I wrote them (plagerizing heavily from others).
Back then, I was more of a systems engineer, but needs must when the devil drives.
Today, I'm just a cook. ;)
/johnny
Thanks will check it out. http://www.minimaxconcrete.com
But my initial point is that Linux is a Unix clone not an invention. Linus himself admits, "I'm working on a free version of a minix-lookalike for AT-386 computers", and minix was itself a unix clone. The point isn't that there is anything wrong with Linux, it is that people who are cloners have a skewed vision of "invention".
I was taught that the US patent system was adopted from Venice, where patents were used to entice guilded crafts to divulge their knowledge to the public. Wiki has a pretty good Summary History of Patent Law.
I agree with you that 100 years for copyright is bad (awful) policy. I suspect bribery to the politicians was in play. Life of the creator, max.
The genetic code patents don't bother me, because they have to be embodied in order to obtain protection. But some countries have a policy against patents in the field of health care. Not much in the way of medical R&D in those countries.
Trademark has an indefinite life. Theoretically, it can be perpetual. The point of trademark is to create and protect a public assocaition with a certain "quality" or brand of product.
Copyright means that the existing works can't be viewed without a licence, which usually means paying a royalty to the copyright holder.
Ten grand is a good budgetary number for US Utility only. Cheapest I have done was about half that, most come in around $7,000 all done. $3,000 for preparation and filing is actually on the cheap side. Most important thing is to have the writer understand the prior art, and how your invention is patentably distinct. Then it's up to you to decide if that difference has a chance of commercial success where the profits will recover your cost of IP protection.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.