Posted on 12/08/2011 7:53:17 AM PST by Mountain Bike Vomit Carnage
During the holiday season, Macy’s is regarded as a shopping Mecca, but in Texas, the retail giant is at the centre of a controversy.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
How is a normal person supposed to tell the difference between those who think they are "transgendered individuals" and run of the mill transvestites, transsexuals or common perverts?
Does the store provide training? Should Transgenders be issued a license so they aren't mistaken for common perverts?
Maybe the "transgendered individuals" should be required to wear a sign something like this:
NOTICE:
I AM NOT AN EVERYDAY PERVERT
I AM A TRANSGENDERED INDIVIDUAL
Girly Mens Department - Third Foor
not to me...these freaks should not be allowed in women’s restroom
it’s silly
what is next...gay men who still have willies get to use the girl’s room too?
we are headed straight to Horse in Senate days here...no doubt
Indeed. Unlike the go-to solution for restrooms (the single-occupant "unisex" facility), I've never seen a "unisex" fitting room.
But I suspect it's just a matter of time.
Macy's will lose alot more customers if they allow these yahoo's to freely frequent the women's changing rooms, and they may need to be reminded of THAT!
Last week, a few women freaked out when he seen and heard was showering in the women's shower at our company's health facility. The report was that the shower curtain was open, he was facing outwards and groaning about how sour he was from working out.
I support the Macy's worker. We should only use the biological definition of what a male or female is period.
Every woman knows those dressing rooms are not all that private. The changing stalls do not have full sized doors with locks. The curtains never close completely and the “doors” will have 24 inches open at the bottom, broken slats in the louvers, etc. Most have no latches at all, and can be opened by someone merely bumping them as they pass by.
I refuse to shop where the dressing rooms are not reseved for the protection and privacy of a single gender.
Every woman knows those dressing rooms are not all that private. The changing stalls do not have full sized doors with locks. The curtains never close completely and the “doors” will have 24 inches open at the bottom, broken slats in the louvers, etc. Most have no latches at all, and can be opened by someone merely bumping them as they pass by.
I refuse to shop where the dressing rooms are not reseved for the protection and privacy of a single gender.
Oh, for crying out loud. Everybody knows transvestites like to put on a show. That’s why they’re transvestites. Have them take off and put on their clothes in the aisles. There’s the holiday spirit.
My daughter and I were in a dressing room in Kohls in Austin, TX three years ago. There was a man (not transgender) in one of the stalls. I complained but nothing was done. Kohls lost this customer that day and I haven’t been back since.
Of course, with spy cams in dressing rooms there’s no telling who’s looking. Check the return policy and take clothing home to try on.
The woman primarily catered to is mentioned in the Bible, Revelation 17:3 http://www.blueletterbible.org/Bible.cfm?b=Rev&c=17&t=KJV#3
There are many that have unisex dressing rooms. Just a curtain or swinging door but you don't see a problem? With that reasoning the gal already had her clothes off so it's not like it was a rape-rape.
So basically, because of “political correctness”, Macy’s dressing rooms are unsafe for everyone due to the demands/rights of the sexually deviant.
???
The first I saw was three years ago at mall in Round Rock, TX (suburb of Austin). Same trip as my previous post about the perv in the Kohls dressing room. Sick thing is that Austin Kohls isn't at that mall which told me this is widespread. I haven't been back to that mall either.
I personally prefer not to encounter any chicks with d**ks while trying on clothing for purchase. Thank God for internet shopping.
they are NOT “transgendered” as long as they still have a penis. They are just good old fashioned transvestites.
You said there wouldn’t be a problem with making them unisex dressing rooms. I’m saying there would be. I see you had another poster disagree with you, too.
God Bless you, Miss Johnson, with a better job and a more sane management.
I don’t understand your rape-rape thing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.