Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Space Digital?
Scientific American ^ | 1/17/12 | Michael Moyer

Posted on 02/03/2012 5:46:10 AM PST by LibWhacker

An experiment going up outside of Chicago will attempt to measure the intimate connections among information, matter and spacetime. If it works, it could rewrite the rules for 21st-century physics

Craig Hogan believes that the world is fuzzy. This is not a metaphor. Hogan, a physicist at the University of Chicago and director of the Fermilab Particle Astrophysics Center near Batavia, Ill., thinks that if we were to peer down at the tiniest subdivisions of space and time, we would find a universe filled with an intrinsic jitter, the busy hum of static. This hum comes not from particles bouncing in and out of being or other kinds of quantum froth that physicists have argued about in the past. Rather Hogan’s noise would come about if space was not, as we have long assumed, smooth and continuous, a glassy backdrop to the dance of fields and particles. Hogan’s noise arises if space is made of chunks. Blocks. Bits. Hogan’s noise would imply that the universe is digital.

It is a breezy, early autumn afternoon when Hogan takes me to see the machine he is building to pick out this noise. A bright-blue shed rises out of the khaki prairie of the Fermilab campus, the only sign of new construction at this 45-year-old facility. A fist-wide pipe runs 40 meters from the shed to a long, perpendicular bunker, the former home of a beam that for decades shot subatomic particles north toward Minnesota. The bunker has been reclaimed by what Hogan calls his Holometer, a device designed to amplify the jitter in the fabric of space.

(Excerpt) Read more at scientificamerican.com ...


TOPICS: Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: digital; planck; quantum; space

1 posted on 02/03/2012 5:46:14 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

It is more likely that time is digital (or quantized). For space to be digital, it would have to be “holely” in that marbles in a jar have spaces between them. That would be not allowed. If time were digital, particles could be like marbles in a jar.


2 posted on 02/03/2012 5:53:04 AM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

Now, hold on a second, if you FLIP the concept, and imagine that space is like “holes” in a jar of marbles that OVERLAP and occupy, in part, the same space as other marbles, that’d give you a lot of jitter eh!


3 posted on 02/03/2012 6:05:21 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Gamma ray observations have already placed a lower limit on the graininess of space, much lower than the Planck scale.


4 posted on 02/03/2012 6:05:52 AM PST by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
That would be not allowed. If time were digital, particles could be like marbles in a jar.

You are overlooking the possibility that those marbles are all identically shaped cubes. No gaps between cubes.

5 posted on 02/03/2012 6:37:04 AM PST by InterceptPoint (TIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
we would find a universe filled with an intrinsic jitter, the busy hum of static.

Michio Kaku disagrees. He believes the world and the universe are like an incredible, smoothly running machine devoid of chaos.

6 posted on 02/03/2012 6:43:23 AM PST by RoosterRedux (Newt: "Why vote for the guy who lost to the guy who lost to Obama?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

So...uh...WE are the SIMS!


7 posted on 02/03/2012 6:48:36 AM PST by sonofagun (Some think my cynicism grows with age. I like to think of it as wisdom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

space can not be cubes.

If there were cubes, the vibrations would be different along a diagonal vs. along an axis and we could see the difference.

This is why time is probably quantized and not space.


8 posted on 02/03/2012 7:55:15 AM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson