Skip to comments.Right-wingers are less intelligent than left wingers, says study
Posted on 02/13/2012 11:35:51 AM PST by Olog-hai
Right-wingers tend to be less intelligent than left-wingers, and people with low childhood intelligence tend to grow up to have racist and anti-gay views, says a controversial new study.
Conservative politics work almost as a 'gateway' into prejudice against others, say the Canadian academics.
The paper analyzed large UK studies which compared childhood intelligence with political views in adulthood across more than 15,000 people.
The authors claim that people with low intelligence gravitate towards right-wing views because they make them feel safe.
Crucially, people's educational level is not what determines whether they are racist or notit's innate intelligence, according to the academics.
Social status also appears to play no part.
The study, by academics at Brock University in Ontario, Canada, used information from two UK studies from 1958 and 1970 , where several thousand children were assessed for intelligence at age 10 and 11, and then asked political questions aged 33.
The 1958 National Child Development involved 4,267 men and 4,537 women born in 1958.
The British Cohort Study involved 3,412 men and 3,658 women born in 1970.
It's the first time the data from these studies has been used in this way.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
All anyone needs to do is take a trip through DU land and read the posts to see this study is a sham.
What does ‘low intelligence’ mean?
I’d comment, but I lack the brain mass to understand this.
Socialism ALWAYS FAILS, always. Who’s your daddy dumb liberals?
This how it is done: Open with this “and people with low childhood intelligence tend to grow up to have racist and anti-gay views, says a controversial new study.”
Just start by giving this definition to conservatives and the rest of the article writes itself.
Time, Newsweek, the Nation, NYT WP and all leftist publications follow the same formula. State the “fact,” then go from there.
Gosh, Leftists do a study and find that they are correct in their presumptions. What a shocker.
The excuse for the new genocide is on its way folks.
Adorno et al
(previous lefty generation’s phono psych stuff . . . .)
Just another step in the UK towards putting dissenters in “re-education camps.”
For their own good, of course.
The US will be following along presently.
So wait, people who are unintelligent gravitate to right-wing politics that preach self-reliance and independence as opposed to left-wing politics that promote big government solutions and welfare? Yeah, that makes a lot of sense...
You know, you can always rely on leftists to put out studies like this. They use them to prove they’re better than we are and more entitled to living. Look at the great abortionist leaders like Margaret Sanger who claimed blacks and other races were less intelligent and needed abortion to keep their numbers down. The left has always been fixated on crazy secularist/nihilist notions and Neitzche’s notion of the ubermenschen. That’s part of why they put out studies to try and prove they’re better than everyone else.
Shut up because you’re [fill in the blank]! - the Left explained.
If I ever found myself in a survival situation, I would want all “right-wingers” on my side. “Left-wingers” are idiots and depend too much on others always bailing them out.
Yes that Pol Pot was a real genius, wasn’t he? Stalin. Mao. Lenin. Marx.
Hell, look at the people’s paradise that is Cuba today. Need we more evidence of this study’s validity?
I wonder how smart they’ll feel when the global economic collapse occurs and the left doesn’t have guns.
As if living a good, moral life requires intelligence! Even a complete retard can tell right from wrong and do good in their life.
You want to talk about what makes a good person? Intelligence has nothing to do with it. It’s your character and your morals and how you treat others.
Brock celebrates its place in the biosphere with UN flag raising
Published on January 26 2012 Brock University raised a United Nations flag at its St. Catharines campus today to celebrate its geographic location within the Niagara Escarpment Biosphere Reserve.
The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) designated Ontario's Niagara Escarpment a Biosphere Reserve in February 1990.
The ceremony was co-ordinated by Brocks newly established Environmental Sustainability Research Centre (ESRC), which was created to pursue transdisciplinary research at the University concerning the environment, sustainability and social-ecological resilience.
The same UNESCO that recognized “Palestine”, of course.
What do British “right wingers” have to do with Americans anyway?
Psychiatrists and psychologists are dangerous to humans and other living things. 85% of’em are certifiable and should be removed to an island where they can only analyze each other. They would be happy as clams for the rest of their unnatural lives.
That alone would prove that this ‘study’ and the people that produced it are completely incompetent.
My wife works at a university. It is amazing how many people profess every liberal belief (so called liberal straight ticket) but when you have a private conversation you find out that they think most of it is nonsense.
Part of the success of liberalism is that for so many fields it has become a prerequisite to profess belief for it.
And that is the other thing this study missed entirely. Many people, especially the more educated, feel they must express liberal ideas in public. Conservatives are more likely to say, “FU, this is what I believe - take it or leave it!” What people openly profess to believe is not so much a measure of intelligence as it is a measure of backbone.
What a BS survey. The authors define “right wing views” as racist views. Racists usually do have lower intelligence. Ergo, Right wingers are stupid. But what about the fact that through out US history, most racists were Democrats? And is a belief in limited government “stupid.” Is a belief in Socialism “smart.” How does that play out when you view the evidence of the collapse of Socialist countries? How does it play out when you see that Statism results in situations like Greece where people riot when you try to balance the budget, or Detroit, where liberalism has destroyed the city? Were those people smart? Were the ones who said expanding entitlements is dangerous stupid?
Liberalism is the intellectually lazy path to a feeling of self-worth and superiority. It’s a sham that rejects reality in favor of a world view that sees things the way the liberal wants things to be instead of the way they really are. Liberal self delusion is at the heart of this bogus “study”.
Doublethink in real life. What is even worse is that they have the authority to throw the "liberal straight ticket" into the sewer where it belongs yet tenaciously hold onto it; they don't have to fear loss of funding that much.
My wife works at a university. It is amazing how many people profess every liberal belief (so called liberal straight ticket) but when you have a private conversation you find out that they think most of it is nonsense
So, I take it soccer-riot yobs are right-wingers?
There they go confusing creativity and imagination with intelligence again.
Pay particular attention to the role of Gordon Allport, the supporter of the Communists in the Spanish Civil War, who as a Professor at Harvard was touted across academia as an expert on "Prejudice," by the 1950s & 1960s. He even insulted those who valued their own families--a real example of fatuous Leftist theory substituted for reality.
STUDY FINDS LEFT WING STUDIES FAIR AND UNBIASED!
I truly wish that this would be broadcast across every PA system in every school in every state of this nation every day. We would hear high school "history" teachers' heads exploding to the 1812 Overture across the country. It would be epic.
It means you disagree with them!
More likely, the brighter you are the more likely you are to hide your prejudice. Gosh, the authors of the study are not very bright.
This must explain why left wingers are constantly clamoring for the nanny state to wipe their arse, while right wingers prefer the government stay the hell out of their grill.
Eye an a Cunservitfe and thets knot trew!
Interesting. Then why are we working while they’re camping out in public places?
I have been on FR for over 10 years, owned my own successful business, have a Masters of Science in Biology and a measured IQ of 135 and consider myself Conservative/liberatian. So where does that put me in this study?
On the other hand I have liberal friends who regurgitate everything MSNBC and the NYT tells them, and haven’t had an original thought in years. Where would they be placed in this study?
The biggest problem is that you find most of the concentration of brainless liberal jackasses in the administration of most colleges and universities. The people I'm usually talking to are lower level professors. The completely brainless administrators make their life difficult, even if they profess to be liberal. If they dare show the slightest bit of conserativesm, they are singled out for extra abuse. Once they are tenured, they can be a little more outspoken. But even after achieving that status, the administration still has ways to make like difficult should they choose to. And if you are the slightest bit conservative, they will choose to.
This doesn’t jive with my university experience, admittedly a poor test of intelligence, but a marker of academic performance. Based on my experience, the overall quality of higher education could be dramatically improved by increasing the number of conservative professors and students. Too many conservatives eschew higher education because of things like work, wealth accumulation, and their extreme disdain for the company of liberals. But, this is a purely subjective observation, and an unneeded one. Genuinely intelligent people know conservatives are smarter and more culturally aware.
How did conservative get to be defined as racist? How about we define leftists as people who believe in statist policies inevitably leading to wholesale slaughter such as the 100,000,000 civilians murdered by their own governments trying to impose socialism in the 20th century?
LOL. I was very liberal for 30 years. Now I am more conservative. How can that be if political affiliation is based on “inate” intelligence?
And what about conservatives who become liberal (I know, there aren’t that many, but it does happen) - where do they get their supposedly increased “inate” intelligence?
According to the study you are stupid. Luckily, you are so dumb you cannot even read this response to know how dumb you actually are. You are also a homophobic racist. Please have any intelligent liberal, such as the ones that conducted this study, tell you what some of those words mean. Not all of them, mind you. Your pea-sized brain couldn’t begin to understand all of them at once.
Your liberal friends who can regurgitate everything on MSNBC are not only intelligent but enlightened.
I hope that answers your questions 8>)
April 19th-20th, 2002
Chicago Illinois Union
828 S. Wolcott
This conference is part of the Center's mission of helping to create a more engaged civil society, working towards social change, fostering coalitions between theorists and activists, and combating anti-intellectualism in contemporary culture. It will be both a celebration of ideas and a rigorous examination of the roles and responsibilities that intellectuals play in society.
I. Why Do Ideas Matter? (a keynote panel)
We introduce the meta theme of the conference by hearing success stories from diverse voices discussing their experiences intervening intellectually.
Timuel Black, Chicago activist; Prof. Emeritus, City Colleges of Chicago
Lonnie Bunch, President, Chicago Historical Society
Bernardine Dohrn, Northwestern University Law School, Children and Family Justice Center
Gerald Graff, UIC, College of Liberal Arts & Sciences
Richard Rorty, Stanford University, Philosophy
III. Lunch and Public Encounters
Alternative breakout tours led by Chicago activists. Tours of Bronzeville and other communities, and visits to organizations that are working on partnering theorists with activists.
IV. Intellectuals in Times of Crisis
Experiences and applications of intellectual work in urgent situations.
William Ayers, UIC, College of Education; author of Fugitive Days
Douglass Cassel, Northwestern University, Center for International Human Rights
Cathy Cohen, University of Chicago, Political Science
Salim Muwakkil, Chicago Tribune; In These Times
Barack Obama, Illinois State Senator
Barbara Ransby, UIC, African-American Studies (moderator)
The Center for Public Intellectuals
University of Illinois-Chicago (UIC):
"Dig It. First they killed those pigs, then they ate dinner in the same room with them, they even shoved a fork into a victims stomach! Wild!"
-Weather Underground leader and wife of Bill Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn ("intellectual"), referring to the Manson murders
Article: Allies in War -by David Horowitz
FrontPageMagazine.com | Monday, September 17, 2001
"Kill all the rich people. Break up their cars and apartments. Bring the revolution home, kill your parents, that's where it's really at"
--Bill Ayers ("intellectual") (1970), quoted in New York Times, September 11, 2001:
Article: "No Regrets for a Love Of Explosives; In a Memoir of Sorts, a War Protester Talks of Life With the Weathermen"
"It was at the Chicago home of [Bill] Ayers and [Bernardine] Dohrn that ["intellectual"] Obama, then an up-and-coming 'community organizer,' had his political coming out party in 1995. Not content with this rite of passage in Lefty World where unrepentant terrorists are regarded as progressive luminaries, still working 'only to educate' both Obamas tended to the relationship with the Ayers."
Article: The Company He Keeps:
Meet Obamas circle: The same old America-hating Left
Same here, but when I sent them you tube clips of 0 bummer saying he had campaigned in all 57 states, they never bothered to reply. Part of my email read: "Real genius you voted for in the election".