Oh, I gave you an answer.
It just wasn’t the one you pre-loaded to allow yourself no possibility of being proven wrong.
And frankly, I’m more than satisfied for those watching this thread to see how you tried to “game” the argument.
>>Oh, I gave you an answer.<<
No you didn’t. You just fell back on argumentum ad absurdum.
It is a valid forensic approach, but certainly a classic (and humorous) logical fallacy.
Are you shooting for every possible logical fallacy possible? You are a great example for many, so far.