Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sometimes, Size is Everything! (that new 39-meter European telescope)
Starts with a Bang ^ | 6/12/12 | Ethan Siegel

Posted on 06/13/2012 9:56:39 PM PDT by LibWhacker

“I went into a clothing store, and the lady asked me what size I was. I said, ‘Actual’. I’m not to scale.” -Demitri Martin

When you look out at the Universe, what you can see is limited, at the most fundamental level, by the size of what you look with. This is why you can see dimmer objects at night — when your pupils are dilated — than you can when your pupils are constricted.

Dilated Eyes

Image credit: National Institute of Health.

This same principle that applies to your eyes applies to telescopes as well. As telescopes have grown in size, so has our ability to see deeper into the Universe, as we can collect more light and view dimmer, fainter objects. Things that would have appeared imperceptible to us with less sophisticated equipment suddenly explode into view, brilliant and distinct.

A tiny area of the Milky Way



An even smaller area

Images credit: Mike Read (WFAU), UKIDSS/GPS and VVV, from VISTA.

In fact, as a consequence of telescopes getting larger, we can not only see deeper and farther, we can also see with higher resolution! These dim objects not only become visible to us, they also come into focus.

Binary Star Resolution

Image credit: Nick Stroebel, retrieved from Robert W. O'Connell's site.

The reason for this? Astronomically, the resolution you can see with is determined by how many wavelengths of the light you’re looking at can fit across your telescope! Scientifically, this is known as the Rayleigh Criterion, and it basically tells you that every time you double the diameter of your telescope, you not only quadruple your light-gathering power, you also double your resolving power.

Or, if you want to double your resolving power without building a telescope twice as large, you can look at shorter wavelengths of light!

Herschel 3 wavelengths.

Image credit: ESA / Herschel and the PACS consortium.

The shorter the wavelength of your light, the tinier the imperfections in your surface are allowed to be. For a gamma-ray telescope, the highest quality optics are demanded, while with a radio telescope, tremendous dishes (or arrays of dishes) are required to obtain even modest resolution, but the optical quality can be fairly lax. If the size of your telescope is fixed, wavelength is everything for determining resolution.

Wavelength is Everything

Image credit: NASA / JWST science team.

But if you’re determined to use a particular wavelength of light, then the converse is true: size is everything. For human beings, we’ve used visible light for far longer than we’ve had telescopes, and so that has a fixed wavelength. You want to get better at it? You build a bigger telescope. And for some time, that’s been exactly what we’ve been doing.

James Webb and Hubble Primary mirrors

Image credit: NASA, with the 2.4-meter diameter HST mirror and JWST's segmented 6.5-meter diameter optics.

While space has been the best environment for achieving these maximal resolutions, recent advances have allowed ground-based telescopes, despite having to contend with atmospheric distortion, to catch up. Most recently the 8-meter, ground-based Gemini Telescope has revolutionized adaptive optics so significantly that, for the first time, a ground based telescope has defeated the optical resolution of Hubble!

Hubble image of NGC 288.



Gemini image of NGC 288

Images credit: NASA / HST and Gemini Observatory / NSF / AURA / CONICYT / GeMS / GSAOI.

Well, if size is everything for optical resolution, the largest telescopes in the world — the 10-meter class giants — are about to have their hats handed to them. A new record-breaker, or I should say record-demolisher, was just approved by the European Southern Observatory consortium.

And, I promise you, you’ve never seen anything like it.

Construction of the E-ELT

Image credit: ESO / L. Calçada.

Sure, it may look like any giant, isolated telescope on the top of a high desert mountain, where the air is thin and rarefied, the skies are clear, and light pollution is virtually nil. But looks can be deceiving; this telescope is unique in all the world.

Artist's impression of the E-ELT.

Image credit: ESO / L. Calçada.

You’ve never seen this before: an observatory that’s literally the size of a football stadium! (Or, equivalently, a fútbol stadium.) But it’s the telescope inside — with a set of primary optics nearly 40 meters in diameter — that shatters all the records. Unlike Hubble’s single mirror, which is a bit larger than a human, or James Webb’s segmented design, with a honeycomb of 18 human-sized mirrors, this new telescope features a primary mirror made of 798 segments, each 1.4 meters across.

A reconstruction of the ESO's E-ELT.

Image credit: ESO / L. Calçada.

For a cost of just over 1 billion Euros (it is an ESO project, after all), the European Extremely Large Telescope (E-ELT) will become the world’s largest eye on the sky. How much larger and how much more power will it have? In fact, the E-ELT will gather more light than all of the existing 8–10-metre class telescopes on the planet, combined.

But the first thing to be built won’t be even one of these giant segments; the first thing to begin construction will be the adaptive optics system; one of the most challenging bits. Remember how adaptive optics works?

You take what you see through the atmosphere — distortions and all — and, by focusing in on a “guide star” (or series of guide stars) whose properties are known, you build an “adaptive mirror” that literally un-blurs the image for you!

But how do you make a fluid-like mirror that can adapt in real-time to the changing atmospheric distortions? It isn’t that the mirror itself is fluid, it’s that it’s thin enough that it can be mounted on an electronically-adaptive system!

Adaptive Optics for E-ELT

Image credit: Microgate / ADS / ESO.

The flat mirror that rests upon this apparatus will be about 2.5 metres in diameter but just 2 millimetres thick, allowing it to be deformed like a flexible film. More than five thousand voice-coil actuators will flex the shape of the reflecting surface of the mirror up to a thousand times per second, precisely canceling out the distorting effect of the atmosphere. (See here for more details.)

M4 mirror; the adaptive optics system of the E-ELT

Image credit: Microgate / ADS / ESO.

The result is an adaptive mirror that gives us a final image that’s comparable to what we’d get from a space telescope, except getting a 40-meter-diameter telescope in space is a pipe dream at this point!

While a whole slew of revolutionary science will come out of this, including measurement of the first stars, the earliest galaxies, and unprecedented high-resolution imaging of pretty much anything you can imagine, the biggest victory will go to those on the hunt for exoplanets. Because with this new E-ELT, we’ll be able to directly image exoplanets as small as Earth around stars many hundreds of light-years away.

Artist's impression of Gliese 667C

Image credit: Artist's impression of Gliese 667C, ESO/L. Calçada

In just a generation, we’ll go from knowing just one star with exoplanets around it to direct imaging of thousands of Earth-sized (and possibly Earth-like) worlds around distant stars.

This is why we invest in science; this is what we can achieve.



TOPICS: Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: 39meter; eelt; european; telescope
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

1 posted on 06/13/2012 9:56:52 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lx; Verginius Rufus; Paradox; cripplecreek; Jonty30; BitWielder1; 21stCenturion; ...

Pinging Freepers who made substantive comments on the earlier thread about this telescope and who appeared to be genuinely interested in it. Don’t worry if you do not want to be pinged by me. This is only the second time I’ve done a group ping (small groups both times) in 15 years and it’s not likely to happen again. I just couldn’t resist this time, this article is so much fun! :-)


2 posted on 06/13/2012 10:05:42 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

I.
Am.
Stunned.
!


3 posted on 06/13/2012 10:11:45 PM PDT by sauron ("Truth is hate to those who hate Truth" --unknown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

I.
Am.
Stunned.
!


4 posted on 06/13/2012 10:12:52 PM PDT by sauron ("Truth is hate to those who hate Truth" --unknown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

I love this stuff, thank you.


5 posted on 06/13/2012 10:15:53 PM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

When I was a Boy Scout, I had a rare opportunity to visit the Palomar Observatory and spent a chilly night helping to take photos through the 200 inch; and like many in Southern California, I’ve been to the 100 inch at Mt. Wilson. I’m still amazed at the science behind observatories like the CHARA array, but this one goes that extra mile.. Adaptive reflectors have very long been the holy grail of reflective telescopes.

An adaptive field that big - wow, it is amazing. I remember some experiments in using liquids as an adaptive surface, but the reaction times were just too slow, or it created new problems in dealing with heat waves from the liquid.

But a billion dollars?? There’s some serious skimming in there for over-inflated salaries.

There’s a lot of very dedicated people out there - heck, Mt. Wilson’s Solar Telescope still draws sunspot activity by hand each day.


6 posted on 06/13/2012 10:27:02 PM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kingu
But a billion dollars??

Euros, actually. Does seem steep. But still, small government guy that I am, I nevertheless want us (Americans) to build something better and more powerful, even if it costs more.

For instance, I'd LOVE to see us build a space-based optical interferometer, perhaps a few million miles across. But still doable with today's technology, not too expensive and serviceable. With such a telescope, iirc, we'd not only be able to image small planets out to several hundred light years, but rivers, lakes, forests and perhaps, animals, if those things exist that close to us.

7 posted on 06/13/2012 10:59:42 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

My former girlfriend complained about the size of my telescope. Said it wasn’t big enough to explore the black hole.


8 posted on 06/13/2012 11:08:03 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (If you like lying Socialist dirtbags, you'll love Slick Willard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

Oh, stop. You’re just trying to get on my next ping list. ;-)


9 posted on 06/13/2012 11:31:21 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Remember when we (the US) used to do stuff like this (build the best and biggest of everything)?


10 posted on 06/13/2012 11:32:14 PM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aquila48

I do, indeed. Zero’s made us second rate in science overnight. Next to follow will be economic and military might.


11 posted on 06/13/2012 11:35:58 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

“European Extremely Large Telescope”
That’s nothing compared to the Overwhelmingly Large Telescope:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overwhelmingly_Large_Telescope


12 posted on 06/13/2012 11:39:36 PM PDT by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Amazing. Add me to the list please.


13 posted on 06/13/2012 11:40:13 PM PDT by spetznaz (Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Born to Conserve

Wow, thx. Hadn’t heard of OWL.


14 posted on 06/13/2012 11:47:42 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz

Hi, spetz... Sorry, I would be happy to add you if there were one. But this was only a temporary one-off deal.


15 posted on 06/13/2012 11:51:24 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Great post! Reminds me of a question on optics I had giving the optical dimensions of a camera. I had to figure out at what distance would you be able to determine that a blip in the distance was actually the 2 headlights of a car coming towards you. I actually measured the distance between the headlights on my car. Cool stuff with them Airy disks!


16 posted on 06/14/2012 12:20:38 AM PDT by gr8eman (Ron Swanson for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

“For instance, I’d LOVE to see us build a space-based optical interferometer, perhaps a few million miles across. But still doable with today’s technology, not too expensive and serviceable. With such a telescope, iirc, we’d not only be able to image small planets out to several hundred light years, but rivers, lakes, forests and perhaps, animals, if those things exist that close to us.”

Yep, send one telescope in one direction, send another in another direction and combine the imaging power of both together. Depending on how far you send them away - lol, you could image absolutely everything. ;)


17 posted on 06/14/2012 12:21:05 AM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas, Texas, Whisky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

The NIH images showing the operation of the dilated and undilated eye are incorrect.


18 posted on 06/14/2012 12:26:32 AM PDT by Erasmus (BHO: New supreme leader of the homey rollin' empire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gr8eman
Cool stuff with them Airy disks!

On the Hubble, I think you need to call them vacuumy disks.

19 posted on 06/14/2012 12:44:52 AM PDT by Erasmus (BHO: New supreme leader of the homey rollin' empire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Erasmus

How so?


20 posted on 06/14/2012 1:25:38 AM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson