Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

QUESTION: Recommendation For An Old Vehicle.
Me | June 23, 2012 | Yosemitest

Posted on 06/23/2012 1:37:44 AM PDT by Yosemitest

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
What are your recommendations?
1 posted on 06/23/2012 1:37:59 AM PDT by Yosemitest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

‘53 Chevy Coup. Straight Shift. 6 cylinder.


2 posted on 06/23/2012 1:41:10 AM PDT by Ecliptic (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

I used to have a 4WD ‘53 Willy’s Wagon. I really liked it and it turned a lot of heads. Definitely will pull a small trailer. It had no A/C though.


3 posted on 06/23/2012 1:52:19 AM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ecliptic
I don't really like Chevy vehicles, mostly because I grew up liking Fords,
but I do have some 64 Chevy trucks with 327s and 350s that hold up well on the farm, and in the wooods.
4 posted on 06/23/2012 1:53:34 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's simple, fight or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rawhide

What kind of mileage did it get? Could it be expected to get 20 mpg, or is about 15 mpg all one could expect?


5 posted on 06/23/2012 1:55:24 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's simple, fight or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

My dad always liked the Ford Falcon, he could always find a cheap used one and fix it up fairly cheap and easily, and would use them for every day vehicle and would haul wood with them short distances, mostly just a few miles or so from home.


6 posted on 06/23/2012 2:14:19 AM PDT by ReformedBeckite (1 of 3 I'm only allowing my self each day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest
Early to mid '60s Chevy II Sedan or Coupe. 1962 - 1965. Straight 6 (great motor) or small V-8 (260 or 283)..preferably the 6. Power Glide auto or 3 on the tree.
Reliable, easy to find parts, dependable and will pull the small trailer.

Also very easy, and cheap, to work on if the need arises.
7 posted on 06/23/2012 2:19:21 AM PDT by Tainan (Cogito, ergo conservatus sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest
Any of the post-'53 chevy V-8s are relatively simple engines and easy to work on compared to Fords or Chrysler/Dodge. Before '53 they don't have full pressure oiling to the rod bearings and mains, and tend to not last very well. Most can be retrofitted with disc brakes in front, and sheet metal is available for most.

Look back at production numbers--popular vehicles were popular for a reason, and if still so, unfortunately that means the buy-in might be more expensive, but parts should be available. Stay before electronic ignitions and particularly avoid the early (82-85) GM computer cars. If you can find something with points, condenser, and coil instead of the electronic ignitions, it will likely survive doomsday, but the fuel efficiency will not be as good as with HEI ignitions. You can retrofit around that, too, if you want.

Consider, too, that air conditioning was pretty rare until the 60s, and generator electrical systems were no where near as reliable as alternators (about '64).

Seat belts didn't start until about '65, and collapsible steering columns were about the same time. Such safety features, while rudimentary by today's standards, saved a lot of lives.

Just a few things to consider.

In the end, buy a vehicle you can love, because getting it in tip-top shape is a labor of love, and not a good investment in time, labor, parts, and money as a rule.

If towing and not hauling the family is the consideration, look at GM 76-79 pickups. Many 'heavy 1/2 ton' pickups were made with enough suspension to pull a lot more than 1500 lbs, a small-block 350 v-8 (good, basic, cheap horsepower), and with a manual transmission did really well. Parts are available, I'm sure. They had the HEI ignition, but were not computerized, and many had air conditioning as well.

8 posted on 06/23/2012 2:22:05 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest
I think it was over 20 mpg. It has been a few years. I do not think I cared about that though.

Mine was a ‘Forest Green’ originally. Very nice looking.

A couple of things I noticed looking at the photos was there is no back seat, which was important to me. Also the back has carpet, whereas mine had the original wood slats on the floor. I like the look of mine better. Maybe your Willy's has them under the carpet. I used my Willy's for work. I also noticed the front seats are not original, but definitely an upgrade. And the engine is not original, but definitely has the power to pull a trailer.

Looking at all the different cars you posted, I do like the looks of the ‘48 Ford the best. That will definitely turns some heads. Not sure you can tow with that?

I would be concerned whether any of the cars could pull a 1500# trailer other than the Willy's?

I like the A/C vent placement on the old Chevy, behind the rear seat. My brother ‘53 Desoto had the same, with the evaporator in the trunk of car.

Looking at the heater box in the old Willy's brings back memories from my old Willy's, as I had the same type of heater box. I was always very toasty though.

9 posted on 06/23/2012 2:22:26 AM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

Might not be as easy as it used to be.

Carburetors are more difficult to find and more difficult to find a good mechanic to give a tune-up.

Worse yet, the fuels continue to change favoring newer combustion mechanisms and computer controlled fuel injection.

For a return to the 60s, regarding smog controls, drive across the border into Mexico and one gets a rapid reminder of what it used to be like without all those controls. (IMHO, we could still lose over 50% of those controls and still enjoy a relatively clean environment.)


10 posted on 06/23/2012 2:32:42 AM PDT by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

69 Dodge Dart slant 6.


11 posted on 06/23/2012 2:43:50 AM PDT by ebshumidors ( Marksmanship and YOUR heritage http://www.appleseedinfo.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

Please don’t get a Falcon.

We got my husband a Falcon as a gift and have been restoring it for the last year for him while he was deployed. The parts are very expensive and some of them are almost impossible to find. The Falcon is considered an endangered car now.

If I had to do it over again, I’d have bought him a Mustang. It would’ve been about half the cost to restore and maintain. You can find junker cars to scavenge easier.


12 posted on 06/23/2012 2:50:53 AM PDT by Marie (Cain 9s Have Teeth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest
Personally, that I-6 on the Mercury is a basic engine that's easy to work on and the fundamental design of the I-6 across Chevy, Ford and Jeep hasn't changed in decades.

I had a Mercury Comet with a 200 I-6 in it for several years while going through college and the thing was just a workhorse. Keep the oil changed, good air filter and keep timing in sync and it just kept going, and going, and going.

Years later I had a 1996 Jeep Cherokee Country with a 4.0L I-6 in it and every time I'd pop the hood to change the oil or check something it was like looking at the same motor in my old Mercury Comet. Both were incredibly easy to work on absent all the computer/pollution control b.s. which was exactly what someone like me who's not the most mechanically inclined type of guy needs.

You also cannot beat a small-block Chevy V-8 for reliability, dependability and parts availability, so that Willys Wagon would be a good choice in that regard. That and there's some utility to having all that cargo space in the Willy's.

As for me, I want my old Jeep Cherokee Country back. I-6 High Output, no computer control's. It got almost 20 in the city and 26-27 on the highway. No computer control also meant it'd survive an EMP as long as I have a spare distributor and battery in a faraday cage somewhere (which I have in my basement for spare amateur radio equipment.)

13 posted on 06/23/2012 3:01:31 AM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebshumidors
69 Dodge Dart slant 6.

Great motor.

14 posted on 06/23/2012 3:03:15 AM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

I really miss my 1967 Chevelle. It was a 4 door,250 engine, straight 6 that was easy to work on. Lots of room. Parts are readily available. Good solid car.


15 posted on 06/23/2012 3:18:08 AM PDT by RayBob (If guns kill people, can I blame misspelled words on my keyboard?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

I really miss my 1967 Chevelle. It was a 4 door,250 engine, straight 6 that was easy to work on. Lots of room. Parts are readily available. Good solid car.


16 posted on 06/23/2012 3:18:15 AM PDT by RayBob (If guns kill people, can I blame misspelled words on my keyboard?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

I’d get an early Mustang. They’re fun cars and have a cultish following so there are lots of aftermarket sources for parts. Plus, it’ll be easy to sell should the need arise.


17 posted on 06/23/2012 3:18:38 AM PDT by muir_redwoods (Legalize Freedom!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marie
I agree with you Marie!

1966 Ford Mustang!


18 posted on 06/23/2012 3:18:47 AM PDT by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tainan

The Chevy II was a great vehicle.

Bench seats would seat 6 people,perhaps a little cramped.

Sculpting the seats for 4 turned even big cars into 4 passenger cars.

I had a 62 Chevy II convertible, ran the wheels off it.
The windows were roll up I could work on it myself, and fix anything on it.Got 25 MPG had plenty of power. 6 cylinder just kept running.

If I could have any car from the 60 this would be my car.


19 posted on 06/23/2012 3:22:10 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

Checker Taxi Cab - all the reasons here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Checker_Taxi


20 posted on 06/23/2012 4:01:39 AM PDT by Arlis (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson