Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

300 000 year old flint tools found in Northern France
Past Horizons ^ | Monday, July 16, 2012 | Source: INRAP

Posted on 07/17/2012 8:15:24 PM PDT by SunkenCiv

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: equaviator
equaviator: "If human beings were indeed making and using hand tools 300,000 years ago then I think it’s fair to say that the historic timeline of hand tools goes that far back."

By normal definition of the word "history", it began when people themselves began writing, circa 3,200 BC.
Everything before that is classified as "pre-historic".

"Pre-historic" doesn't mean we know nothing about those folks, just that we have no written records which they themselves left.

21 posted on 07/18/2012 2:41:56 PM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
Every time the ice retreats humans occupy that fertile European land. And inevitably we are pushed back when the ice returns.

But, of course, the geniuses at AGW Central have discovered CO2 is the magic bullet that can turn off the glacial cycle! Not!

22 posted on 07/18/2012 5:20:16 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dsrtsage

Great point. Do you have a link/source for your tagline?


23 posted on 07/20/2012 2:53:16 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BroJoeK

So then the difference is between what had been recorded at the time and evidence being discovered and recorded now. I think it all counts as history, whether it be Nostradamus’ Quatraines, cave paintings, distant supernovae or the fossilized remains of some previously undiscovered ancient species.


24 posted on 07/20/2012 5:21:56 AM PDT by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: equaviator
equaviator: "I think it all counts as history..."

Counts for what?
If you wish to count everything as "history" and effectively eliminate the concept of "prehistoric", what exactly do you gain?

To repeat: the usual definition of "history" means "recorded history", with "prehistoric" meaning "before recorded history".

I'd say that's still an important distinction, so what is your problem with it?

25 posted on 07/21/2012 12:53:57 PM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson