ping
I read this article a couple of weeks ago. SPOILER WARNING: All of them averaged 98% misses.
Their concerns for the future are essentially the exact same ones you hear from intellectuals today:
overpopulation
food shortages
fossil fuel shortages which require the widespread use of green/renewable energy
environmental disaster
None of which—not one—has come to pass in the last 25 years.
If the “intellectuals” of a quarter century ago could be THIS wrong about the future, why should we think people making the same predictions today are correct?