Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Diversity may be fatal, says new government health study
Daily Caller ^ | 1:42 AM 10/27/2012 | Neil Munro

Posted on 10/27/2012 12:03:43 PM PDT by Olog-hai

Diversity may be killing older African-Americans and Hispanics, according to a new peer-reviewed study published in the America Journal of Public Health, which shows that people suffer less cancer and heart disease when they live among their racial or ethnic peers.

“Living in an ethnically dense neighborhood is beneficial when it comes to heart disease and cancer,” said Kimberly Alvarez, a co-author of the new study, which was funded by the National Institutes of Health. Alvarez’s phrase, “ethnically dense,” describes a community in which at least 50 percent of people are from the same ethnic group.

Many progressive groups advocate the use of government to increase diversity in housing, education, health care and other sectors. …

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Health/Medicine; Miscellaneous; Society
KEYWORDS: bigotry; diversity; liberalism; libmentaldisorder
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: Olog-hai

21 posted on 10/27/2012 3:42:56 PM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OrangeHoof
I call BS on this. Which neighborhood you live in or whether they are your “peeps” has nothing to do with whether you’ll get cancer. Nothing. What an incredibly stupid study.

Ah, but you have to understand the reasoning for it. It means now it's okay for hispanics and blacks to segregate themselves for their health. Whites will still be expected to "diversify".

22 posted on 10/27/2012 3:53:12 PM PDT by raybbr (People who still support Obama are either a Marxist or a moron.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Diversity was redefined when libs found out Americans hated racial quotas. The word quota was thrown out and diversity substituted. It’s all a flim-flam by the race industry.


23 posted on 10/27/2012 4:56:41 PM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

From the article, regarding blacks, “were 46% less likely to report doctor-diagnosed heart disease and 77% less likely to report cancer than those who lived in an ethnic density of less than 25%...”

Well, as a black person with a PhD and knowing something about studies, blacks, black neighborhoods, and the medical care rec’d by blacks, both with and without money, I’m going to say that blacks in black neighborhoods didn’t have a lot of doctor-diagnosed diseases because they weren’t seeing doctors.

This can be for a variety of reasons - even with medicare (since the sample used people over 65), there are costs related to medical care and some people choose to do without medical care if it will cost them. Some people don’t like to go to doctors. I know from my own and others’ research that blacks will often lie to researchers, especially if the researcher isn’t black.

My own view - if I lived in the ‘Gold Coast’ of DC or another high income black area, that might be one thing, but on the whole, I’d rather live in a diversified, shoot, I’d rather live in a mostly white, professional class neighborhood with its attendant benefits and services.


24 posted on 10/27/2012 6:51:25 PM PDT by radiohead (Buy ammo, store food, pray for the Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson