Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

We Lost...Who To Blame And Why
Alan Levy's Heavy Heart | 11/8/12 | Alan Levy

Posted on 11/08/2012 7:53:08 PM PST by Absolutely Nobama

We lost.

We the People got our teeth kicked down our throat.

I know that sounds harsh, but let's face it fellow Republicans, we're members of a party that failed to defeat a racist, dog-eating, homosexual agenda pushing piece of human garbage who isn't qualified to be a cashier at 7-11, let alone be President of the United States. We, the party of strong economies and national defense, failed as a party to dislodge an economically illiterate man who hates the US military with a passion. In short, this election was an absolute train wreck that may very well destroy the Republic.

Why did this happen, and more importantly, who do we blame ?

The Republican party, like a kid who can't sit still, refuses to learn. Moderate Republicanism and RINOs suck. They're about as exciting as lukewarm bath water. They stand for absolutely nothing. And yet, time and time again, ever since Reagan, they're all the Republican party offers on the presidential stage. Bob Dole ran a tepid, lackluster campaign in 1996 that ended in defeat, as did John McCain in 2008, and Mitt Romney in 2012. Yes Bush I and II won, but let's face the cold hard reality about them. Bush I shed his Reaganite skin like a rattlesnake the moment Ronaldus Magnus went back to his ranch and proceeded to lose to accused rapist Bill Caligula. Bush II won and was magnificent on the War on Terror, but was Herbert Hoover on domestic policy.

To this day, I still have no idea what any of the above folks ran on. (Except for the 2004 election, when it was rather clear it was either Bush or pray to Mecca.) Bush I ? He was Reagan's Veep. Bob Dole ? No idea. Bush II's first run ? I dunno, I voted for Pat Buchanan because it wasn't Conservative, whatever it was. John McCain ? Well, it was his turn. Romney ? He wasn't the guy who bowed to the inbred king of Saudi Arabia. They never gave me a real reason to support them, other than party loyalty. That's a horrid reason to vote for anyone. What's worse, they never gave libertarians, paleocons, Reagan Democrats, or independents a reason to vote for them, either. And hence, they lost (except for Bush II) and in some cases, in a rather embarrassing fashion.

Ladies and gentlemen, the reality of the situation is this: We the People need to take back the Republican party before we do anything else. We need to take over our local Republican parties and send the RINOs packing. Is it easier said than done ? Yep, but what choice do we have ? A third party won't save the day. Working with the communists in the Democrat party is unthinkable for a variety of obvious reasons. We need to stand up and say, "Dont Tread On Me."


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 2012disaster; getoverit; gop; ntsa; obama; romney; stfu
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 last
To: who knows what evil?

And, lest we forget, couldn’t win his own home state.

But yet, we were told time and time again that Romney was the only one who could win by the RINOs that he was the only one who could win.

What’s wrong with this picture ?


101 posted on 11/10/2012 5:15:08 PM PST by Absolutely Nobama (The Doomsday Clock is at 11:59:00......tick-tock, tick-tock, tick-tock.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Absolutely Nobama

Conservatives could win local races right away if there was a Conservative banner to run under. In the Presidential election in 2016 no; they wouldn’t win, and neither would the Republican candidate. When both vote tallys together surpassed the votes the Dem got, however, it would be obvious to the world why the Gop lost. As it is now every second pundit has a different theory as to why Romney lost. I believe he lost because millions of Conservatives stayed home, and had their been a Conservative Party candidate my belief would have been proven true.


102 posted on 11/10/2012 6:58:14 PM PST by csmusaret (I will give Obama credit for one thing- he is living proof that familiarity breeds contempt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Absolutely Nobama

placemark!!!


103 posted on 11/11/2012 6:47:35 PM PST by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GerardKempf
Eisenhower, Reagan and Bush Sr and Jr were not tea partiers - all were centrist conservatives who compromised within reason.

Not so sure that Reagan and Eisenhower wouldn't consider themselves Tea Partiers, today.

104 posted on 11/11/2012 6:50:40 PM PST by Jane Long ("Miss me yet?" - Mitt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Thanks, LJ!!


105 posted on 11/11/2012 7:03:54 PM PST by Absolutely Nobama (The Doomsday Clock is at 11:59:00......tick-tock, tick-tock, tick-tock.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

Reagan most definitely would have. The Tea Party is inspired by Reagan.


106 posted on 11/11/2012 7:05:39 PM PST by Absolutely Nobama (The Doomsday Clock is at 11:59:00......tick-tock, tick-tock, tick-tock.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson