Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2 Texas women sue over roadway body cavity search - VIDEO
klbj ^

Posted on 12/19/2012 2:35:09 PM PST by traumer

DALLAS (AP) - Two women have sued the Texas Department of Public Safety over a body cavity search by a female trooper captured by patrol car video along a Dallas-area highway.

The lawsuit says the July 13 search of 38-year-old Angel Dobbs and her 24-year-old niece, Ashley Dobbs, was unlawful. The Irving women complained to DPS.

DPS spokeswoman Katherine Cesinger on Tuesday declined comment on the lawsuit. Cesinger says results of a Texas Rangers inquiry were sent to the Dallas County district attorney's office. The dispute is expected to reach a grand jury next month.

The women say a male trooper told them he saw them throwing cigarette butts out a car window, questioned them about drugs and summoned a female trooper for a search.

The two women say no drugs were found. Click here for a video of the search.

(Excerpt) Read more at klbj590.com ...


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: policestate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: UnwashedPeasant

It is highly disturbing to say the least....


41 posted on 12/19/2012 5:38:11 PM PST by traumer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: UnwashedPeasant

Yes they should!


42 posted on 12/19/2012 5:43:29 PM PST by Eaker (Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life.” — Robert A. Heinlein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Blackirish

This is beyond outrageous. I was wondering what these women could have said to avoid what happened. If they had said what you posted do you think those cops would have stopped?

My guess the women would have been handcuffed and the assault continued. This is scary stuff. I cannot fathom passively allowing myself being treated like that. How could those women stand there and take that trauma?


43 posted on 12/19/2012 6:10:05 PM PST by Boxsford (God Is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

Being assaulted, in my opinion, is not one of those times to keep your mouth shut. I just cannot imagine standing there taking that abuse.


44 posted on 12/19/2012 6:13:56 PM PST by Boxsford (God Is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Boxsford
This is scary stuff. I cannot fathom passively allowing myself being treated like that. How could those women stand there and take that trauma?

****************************

I don't know. Imho, they were raped.

45 posted on 12/19/2012 6:15:00 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: traumer

Wow. Same glove for frontal and rectal exam?

Did the female cop also use the same glove for either suspect?


46 posted on 12/19/2012 6:20:52 PM PST by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trisham

Yes. You found the word. It wasn’t assault. I believe they were held hostage and raped.


47 posted on 12/19/2012 6:32:40 PM PST by Boxsford (God Is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Boxsford

Yes. I can’t imagine how they must feel, now and forever.


48 posted on 12/19/2012 6:41:39 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: trisham
I take it I am one of the few, maybe the only poster, who will stand up for the cops.

The first officer obviously smelled the odor of marijuana emanating from the vehicle and suspected the females were hiding their stash somewhere on their bodies. So he did the right thing and called for a female to search them.

I do fault him for not asking to search the car and for not requesting a drug dog be brought to the scene. Or at least we didn't see he did. The fact he did neither leads me to believe he had reason to suspect something else.

As with others I fault the female cop for not changing her gloves while doing her search. But to call her a lesbian is a bit over the top.

I lived in TX for years and always found its DPS troopers to be well trained and polite. Be mindful, folks, TX ain't WA or CO and is not tolerant of drugs of ANY kind, including weed. Moreover, the tape just shows so much and I really doubt the kibitzers on here know all the facts.

Ok, now you can flame be but I promise I will simply ignore it. So why bother? Lol

49 posted on 12/19/2012 7:05:51 PM PST by Robwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: traumer

Dyke entertainment on a slow night.

Jan the man set up a whole, systematic sexual abuse operation at the airports under the color of law. People let them get away with it.

We all know that perverts messing with your crotch will keep you safe from drugs and terrorism.


50 posted on 12/19/2012 7:06:29 PM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robwin

I didn’t call her a lesbian. Why did you direct your post to me?


51 posted on 12/19/2012 7:08:39 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: traumer

Texas


52 posted on 12/19/2012 7:14:14 PM PST by Tau Food (Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trisham
I didn’t call her a lesbian. Why did you direct your post to me?

Ok, to this I will respond but only for clarification. I didn't "direct" it to you. Yours was the last post on the thread so I merely clicked on the reply function beneath it. Sorry if I offended you. It was unintentional.

53 posted on 12/19/2012 7:34:27 PM PST by Robwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Robwin

Well she’s big and fat..kinda butch and certainly seems to be enjoying herself. But you know what they say...takes one to know one.


54 posted on 12/19/2012 7:53:45 PM PST by Blackirish (Forward Comrades!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Boxsford

How could those women stand there and take that trauma?

They stood there and took it because they aren’t stupid. We all know what the cops are likely to do if you so much as twitch while they have their hands on you. Verbally objecting, pulling away, or any other “resistance” would not have stopped the sexual assault, and in addition they would likely have sustained cracked skulls, broken ribs, and felony charges.


55 posted on 12/19/2012 7:57:50 PM PST by Hepsabeth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: liberalh8ter
How on earth did we become so complacent with our freedom as to allow another person to sexually molest us on the side of the road simply because they’re an law enforcement officer?

It happens in the last 30 years, when tens of millions of illegals form Mehico, aided and abetted by our own government, started invading the U.S. and demanded free education, heath care, free emergency rooms, food stamps, welfare etc....

56 posted on 12/19/2012 8:52:33 PM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna

All of this because the original trooper forgot to bring his bag of plantable dope........


57 posted on 12/20/2012 12:32:50 AM PST by S.O.S121.500 (That Queer Kenyan muzzy bastard is not my president. ENFORCE the Bill of Rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Robwin

Specific protocols should, and are, in place to prevent searches like this from taking place in full public view. Your acceptance of citizens pulled over in traffic and violated the way that they were is a big part of the problem in this country.


58 posted on 12/20/2012 1:20:17 AM PST by Boxsford (God Is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Hepsabeth

I agree that is exactly what would have happened.


59 posted on 12/20/2012 1:28:42 AM PST by Boxsford (God Is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Robwin

The first officer obviously smelled the odor of marijuana emanating from the vehicle....His first reason for pulling them over was for throwing cigarettes out of the car. Did he charge them with the littering? Apparently not. Then he ‘smelled’ marijuana. Did he ask to search the car? Apparently not. If he was afraid of his safety during this interaction, did he throw them against the car for a frisk? Apparently not. Did he charge the driver for Driving Under the Influence? Apparently not. Did he have Probable Cause for initiating a body cavity search? NO. Not one iota.


60 posted on 12/20/2012 1:48:52 AM PST by Safetgiver ( Islam makes barbarism look genteel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson