Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court to hear case on Obama's alleged forged documents (Photos)
Examiner.com ^ | Jan 10, 2012 | Marc Dumon

Posted on 01/11/2013 4:44:07 AM PST by voicereason

On Wednesday, Chief Justice John Roberts of the Supreme Court scheduled a birther case brought on by Orly Taitz which calls into question Barack Hussein Obama's eligibility to be president of the United States. Dr. Taitz, a lawyer from Santa Margarita, Calif., also made the announcement on her website on Jan. 9. As of this writing, major news networks such as ABC, Fox News, CBS, and NBC have yet to report on the high court's decision to review Barack Hussein Obama's eligibility to hold political office in the United States or any of its territories. The case is identified as Edward Noonan, et al., v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State. On Feb. 15, all nine justices will hear arguments on whether Obama used forged government documents and fake identification in order to get elected as commander-in-chief. Edward Noonan, et al., contend that if Obama had been ineligible to run in 2008, other Democratic candidates should have replaced him on the presidential ballot. Additionally, electoral votes from states such as California that went towards Obama should have been deemed null and void. Continued at source....

(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; naturalborncitizen; obama; orly; orlytaitz; taitz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-182 next last
Not seeing this reported anywhere else., nor on any of the news blogs....too good to be true?
1 posted on 01/11/2013 4:44:15 AM PST by voicereason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: voicereason

It is posted on the Supreme Court’s schedule:

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12a606.htm

No. 12A606
Title:
Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants
v.
Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State
Docketed: December 13, 2012
Lower Ct: Supreme Court of California
Case Nos.: (S207078)

~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dec 11 2012 Application (12A606) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Dec 13 2012 Application (12A606) denied by Justice Kennedy.
Dec 26 2012 Application (12A606) refiled and submitted to The Chief Justice.
Jan 9 2013 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 15, 2013.
Jan 9 2013 Application (12A606) referred to the Court.

~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioner:
Orly Taitz 29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy (949) 683-5411
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
Party name: Edward Noonan, et al.
Attorneys for Respondent:
Kamala Harris Attorney General (916) 445-9555
P. O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Party name: Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State


2 posted on 01/11/2013 4:49:30 AM PST by voicereason (The RNC is the "One-night stand" you wish you could forget.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: voicereason

Is this a shot across obama’s bow?

If Obama is willing to violate the constitution and cause mass chaos with an executive order on gun control. The USSC can take him out on eligibility.

They have been playing politics by not hearing the case. - to avoid chaos?

Perhaps they see this as the easier choice now.


3 posted on 01/11/2013 5:06:59 AM PST by Triple (Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: voicereason

Wow. If nothing else I have to give huge props to Orly for being persistent in spite of being demonized by both the Left AND the Right.


4 posted on 01/11/2013 5:11:47 AM PST by VeniVidiVici (Bathhouse Barry wants YOU to bend over for another four years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Triple
I hope Orly has lots of body guards. The tribal chief with the purple lips will not take kindly to this. You have to wonder what Roberts will be threatended with.
5 posted on 01/11/2013 5:13:20 AM PST by Flavious_Maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: voicereason

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2976497/posts


6 posted on 01/11/2013 5:13:20 AM PST by goldi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: voicereason

7 posted on 01/11/2013 5:13:38 AM PST by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Mater tua caligas exercitus gerit ;-{)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

In before the Hate-Tatiz crowd!


8 posted on 01/11/2013 5:29:57 AM PST by treetopsandroofs (Had FDR been GOP, there would have been no World Wars, just "The Great War" and "Roosevelt's Wars".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

The fact we have had so called “conservatives” like Ann Coulter, Michelle Malkin, and others, attack those questioning Obama Eligibility.....supporting Obama on the issue....this appearance on the SCOTUS docket is huge. Of course, the FraudCons will do their utmost to avoid discussing this

We know CJSCOTUS Roberts supported Obama on ObamaCare.....so it would be no surprise if he supports Obama on the Eligibility issue....and the Liberal PhonyCons will cheerlead the decision I


9 posted on 01/11/2013 5:31:26 AM PST by SeminoleCounty (Fiscal Conservatives are Neither)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

sfl


10 posted on 01/11/2013 5:36:11 AM PST by phockthis (http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/index.htm ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: voicereason
Interesting. Very interesting. I'm not going to get my hopes up, especially considering this is John Robers' SCOTUS and he's the man who made obamacare constitutional.

Still...at least an eligibility case finally made it to the SC.

I wonder what data, poll numbers or ? they are looking at to move this forward now after ignoring it and the many court challenges around the country these last 4 or 5 years.

Do they fear the next few years as much as many of the rest of us do and are slowing things down with the rule of Constitutional law?

Or, are they planning to accelerate our slide into the abyss with some more Constitution shredding like with their obamacare ruling?

11 posted on 01/11/2013 5:39:21 AM PST by GBA (Here in the Matrix, life is but a dream.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GBA

Roberts will slam Orly as directed to protect his own shady South American adoptions, and whatever else they have on him.

Hussein’s handlers want to finally close the books on his pesky eligibility problem in time for Hussein’s Second Coming.

Many here at FR will gleefully support the result against Taitz.


12 posted on 01/11/2013 5:48:55 AM PST by treetopsandroofs (Had FDR been GOP, there would have been no World Wars, just "The Great War" and "Roosevelt's Wars".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: voicereason

All they have to do is subpoena the so-called “birth certificate” and have it analyzed by forgery experts.


13 posted on 01/11/2013 5:57:40 AM PST by eCSMaster (Palin was correct!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: treetopsandroofs

Yup. The only reason they are taking the case is to put it to bed.


14 posted on 01/11/2013 6:03:42 AM PST by cableguymn (The founding fathers would be shooting by now..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: voicereason

Roberts has been blackmailed. The case will end with the following judgement: “Obama is entitled to be President, and in fact, we hereby rule that he is eligible for more terms. We officially dissolve the 22nd Amendment.”


15 posted on 01/11/2013 6:05:54 AM PST by Lazamataz (LAZ'S LAW: As an argument with liberals goes on, the probability of being called racist approaches 1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: voicereason

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2976497/posts

I posted one thread. Its hard to find, since it got retitled and moved from Announcements to bloggers.


16 posted on 01/11/2013 6:09:05 AM PST by Elderberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: voicereason
Are you people this naive, this stupid about Supreme Court procedures to believe there is anything significant about the mere conferencing of this case? Nearly every one of the thousands of petitions for certiorori (requests to the SCOTUS to hear a case) that are filed each year are "considered" by the nine justices at their weekly conference. At these conferences, the justices summarily reject the overwhelming vast majority of cases without discussion.

To put this in prospective, in an average year, the SCOTUS receives about 10,000 petitons for certiorori, nearly all of the petitions are docketed for conference, nearly all of the cases that are docketed for conference are summarily denied based upon the staff recommendation, and the SCOTUS agrees to hear only about 75 - 80 petitions (less that 1%) of the 10,000 it receives.

17 posted on 01/11/2013 6:09:09 AM PST by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeminoleCounty

“The fact we have had so called “conservatives” like Ann Coulter, Michelle Malkin, and others, attack those questioning Obama Eligibility.....supporting Obama on the issue....this appearance on the SCOTUS docket is huge.”

I wonder if they really belive he is eligible? I never have understood the high profile “Malkin, Coulter, Rush, Beck ect.” brushing off people who ask that question as being out there or nuts. The evidence in a court of law seems to actually side with the prosecution if you can get past the corruption and coverup. Could be the Alinski treatment that has been applied to the whole subject scares them off. Upon mention of the subject you are immediately written off as a right wing idiot, which worked just the way it was intended.


18 posted on 01/11/2013 6:09:19 AM PST by selfdefense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: voicereason

I have got to meet Dr. Orly Taitz, she has more balls than any male member of Congress, the courts or the SS.

I have got to meet this lady.


19 posted on 01/11/2013 6:09:33 AM PST by Matthew10 (You can't use what you don't know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeminoleCounty

it would be no surprise if he supports Obama on the Eligibility issue....
*************************************
Not getting my hopes up ,,, but WHY would Roberts NOT take out Obama ,, does he enjoy being blackmailed?


20 posted on 01/11/2013 6:09:37 AM PST by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-182 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson