Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama offers compromise on birth control health coverage
Reuters ^ | 2-1-2013 7:26pm EST | David Morgan

Posted on 02/01/2013 5:11:21 PM PST by ExxonPatrolUs

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Obama administration on Friday sought to settle a dispute with religious leaders over whether employees at faith-affiliated universities, hospitals and other institutions should have access to health insurance coverage for contraceptives.

The new set of proposals would instead guarantee that employees at religious nonprofits would get access to birth control coverage without out-of-pocket costs through separate plans with insurers picking up the tab.

The rules follow months of protest and legal action by groups representing Roman Catholics, Protestant evangelicals and private employers.

They have argued that President Barack Obama's 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act forces them to violate their own religious tenets against contraception.

For more than a year, the Obama administration has grappled with how to balance its desire to guarantee universal contraceptive coverage with religious freedoms provided by the U.S. Constitution.

Faced with the ire of religious leaders and social conservatives in the midst of a heated presidential campaign, Obama said last February that he would create an accommodation for religious employers under the law.

The new rules from the Department of Health and Human Services consolidate many of the ideas administration officials voiced then, but in greater detail.

"Today, the administration is taking the next step in providing women across the nation with coverage of recommended preventive care at no cost, while respecting religious concerns," Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said in a statement.

"We will continue to work with faith-based organizations, women's organizations, insurers and others to achieve these goals."

Some leading religious figures offered a muted response. Cardinal Timothy Dolan of New York said he would study the proposal. So did the Catholic Health Association of the United States, which represents more than 1,200 hospitals and other healthcare facilities.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 02/01/2013 5:11:31 PM PST by ExxonPatrolUs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ExxonPatrolUs

just talk to make headlines....


2 posted on 02/01/2013 5:16:51 PM PST by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExxonPatrolUs
If you're a for-profit businessperson forget about it.

You're forced to fund abortion.

The "War on Women" is actually a "War on the Most Innocent Among Us".

3 posted on 02/01/2013 5:16:58 PM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExxonPatrolUs

Sneaky. He is telling Catholic organizations they don’t have to provide abortion drugs-but their insurance companies do.


4 posted on 02/01/2013 5:24:07 PM PST by Wisconsinlady (The 2nd amendment is NOT about hunting-but protection from a tyrannical govt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExxonPatrolUs

There is absolutely nothing new here. The headline is a lie. What would you expect from the left-stream media and their evil creation owebama.


5 posted on 02/01/2013 5:26:12 PM PST by 43north (BHO: 50% black, 50% white, 100% RED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExxonPatrolUs

ExxonPatrolUs ~: (From the title) “ Obama offers compromise on birth control health coverage “

Do you mean rather than give the full 28 days of contraception
he’s only going to offer 14 days of pills ? (/sarc)
Whata guy !! ( 2X /Sarc !)


6 posted on 02/01/2013 5:29:24 PM PST by Tilted Irish Kilt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExxonPatrolUs

Just another lying fraud. They’re losing several lawsuits on this issue, and this is probably intended to muddy the waters or delay proceedings, as well as give the media fodder to confuse the public.


7 posted on 02/01/2013 5:30:11 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExxonPatrolUs
The Little FudgePacker® didn't budge an inch.

It's the same deal as before. They have to pay for it through a "third party," whatever that means.

And The Little FudgePacker® is forcing us ALL to pay $1 a month to fund abortion. It's symbolic because all money know belongs to the feral government, but he is forcing us all to take part in abortion.

8 posted on 02/01/2013 5:32:20 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (TYRANNY: When the people fear the politicians. LIBERTY: When the politicians fear the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExxonPatrolUs

What an idiot. Does he not realize that the insurance companies will roll the cost into the plan that the customers buy? This guy is a complete dolt.


9 posted on 02/01/2013 5:53:28 PM PST by al_c (http://www.blowoutcongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExxonPatrolUs

Here’s the compromise “Obama” or whatever your name is. I’ll go to whatever doctor I choose whenever I choose pay however I choose and buy whatever insurance I choose at any time without threat or coercion, and you stop being a subversive communist piece of filth.


10 posted on 02/01/2013 5:58:00 PM PST by Ray76 (Do you reject Obama? And all his works? And all his empty promises?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExxonPatrolUs
Our family would like to know why we have to pay for contraceptives while trying to keep our heat and water bills in budget after dropping cable and other perks.
11 posted on 02/01/2013 6:03:45 PM PST by Bronzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Not only are they losing these lawsuits, but they also know most of these large organizations either self-insure this coverage or form captive insurance companies. In other words, there is no insurance company to pass the cost off to- they end up paying it themselves by default. This is not a valid solution.
12 posted on 02/01/2013 6:53:21 PM PST by libertymaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ExxonPatrolUs

“employees at religious nonprofits would get access to birth control coverage without out-of-pocket costs through separate plans with insurers picking up the tab.”

No difference to the original trashing of religious freedom.


13 posted on 02/01/2013 7:05:10 PM PST by y6162
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExxonPatrolUs

FO with your three card Monte, slight of hand...


14 posted on 02/01/2013 8:01:48 PM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExxonPatrolUs

why don’t i believe him?


15 posted on 02/01/2013 8:10:30 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExxonPatrolUs

Oh... Obama can just change his own law at will?


16 posted on 02/01/2013 8:11:33 PM PST by Mr. K (There are lies, damned lies, statistics, and democrat talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExxonPatrolUs

Everyone who believes this, put a dollar in my pocket.


17 posted on 02/01/2013 8:27:40 PM PST by mouske
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson