Posted on 05/16/2013 12:43:34 PM PDT by MestaMachine
How many actually realize there are oligarchs playing with post turtles though?
So they announced the AP phone records scandal and connected it falsely to Yemen. This was cover for the possibility that the real story about phone records being accessed because of Benghazi was going to break soon ? Why else would they openly admit to breaking the law ? Unless it was cover for some more serious law breaking.
This is how they work. They always assume we are all incapable of maintaining our focus, so they dribble out 20 or thirty different versions of the same story, (or 5 different stories at one time,) until it’s ALL meaningless, outrageous, and nowhere even as near to the truth as the first one which they hope no one remembers so that criminal pols like hillary can actually say, “What difference, at this point, does it make?”.
That’s why I keep saying to keep your eye on the prize.
Thanks Ernest.
He did not say “holy” (prophet of islam) in the speech you linked.
“The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.” is what he said.
YES he did. I watched it live. It was scrubbed from the official transcript. It was HIM going off sctipt.
Ahhh! Thank you!
I’d be banned if I posted my thoughts.
God forgive me.
You do great work here FRiend.
Thank you very much and I will read carefully, and a well desrerved BTTT.
A must read.
Wow. Just read it again carefully in entirety.
You are a wonder, MM - thank you - you put it all together - can’t wait for part 2.
The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam. But to be credible, those who condemn that slander must also condemn the hate we see in the images of Jesus Christ that are desecrated, or churches that are destroyed, or the Holocaust that is denied.
I’m not saying I agree or disagree with the comment that this is an ‘evil speech’…. but context means everything when people speak.
Of course 0 had to include some other “who the future doesn’t belong to) for padding and a setting for the meat of his statement about slandering Islam. I didn’t realize he even said “The holy prophet” (you ommitted the “holy” part). His condemnation of slanderers of the prophet is much more weighted than the other statements.
Plus, he never critizes (other than may the most occasional and very rare token) those who kill and slaughter Jews or Christians or destroy their places of worship, or blaspheme their religions. What about his support of MB in Egypt, wehre Copts are harrassed and killed? Or in Syria, where Christians are slaughtered and tormented by the Islamic rebels?
Sheesh, you need to learn more or gain some sense.
I have hardcore leftist relatives but I am not a leftist.
As for your other comments, I think that you are being unnecessarily harsh and frankly, off base…. I’m not arguing that the rest is ‘padding and a setting for the meat’ or that Obama only gives rare token rebukes involving the killing of Christians etc. That may well be absolutely true but none of those statements have anything to do with what I was saying. When people pull red meat sentences such as this out of a long document and make absolutely no reference to the context, it just ends up looking stupid when somebody does read the context. Now if you want to pull the sentence complete with its context out to make some comment that the rest of the sentences are just padding, that makes perfect sense.
Sheeesh, try reading things a bit more carefully next time, do a bit of research or gain some sense.
weare being asked to take Walid’s COUSIN’s word for the FBI connection, not Walid’s word. Walid’s cousin is still a part of the Pali hate Israel terrorist camp. I prefer to not take the world of Walid’s cousin. Is that clearer?
Thanks and apologies to both - I shoudl have read more before attempting to reply. I do that sometimes; post too early and regret it.
Bad news sometimes makes me a bit ill tempered and I need to watch that I don’t vent on those who don’t deserve it.
It looks as though Shoebat said that Nakoula is the FBI asset, not Shoebat’s couson saying it, from what Hardraade said. Maybe he will clarify.
Now I certainly understand being ill-tempered from analyzing too much news from the zero. That will do it to you. Regardless, we all need to remember to measure twice and cut once..... Happy Posting.
I will continue waiting to find out which ... take care, m’Lady.
Thank you - I just took a 2 or 3 month break from FR and I have to watch my step. Too much immersion in this vile cesspool of treason and corruption news and I get affected by it.
There are plenty of things in my actual life that are neglected so it’s not as though I have noghitn to do!
I hope you are well - interesting times ahead no doubt.
Here is what happened. The transcript of the speech was handed out before he gave it. When muslims speak of the prophet, it is holy prophet. So when he was actually at the podium, he reverted ro his natural self, to what he has been taught, and the way he would normally speak to muslims. He did not follow the script. But the media printed the transcript they had been handed. It’s as simple as that.
I watched it. And it isn’t the first time he’s done that. He also speaks that way when he talks about the ‘holy quran’.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.