Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Full title:Is this proof the Virgin Queen was an imposter in drag? Shocking new theory about Elizabeth I unearthed in historic manuscripts

A good read for those of us interested in Historical conspiracy.

1 posted on 06/10/2013 3:34:21 PM PDT by BBell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: BBell

Nothing about this theory stands up to a moment’s scrutiny.


2 posted on 06/10/2013 3:35:26 PM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv

This is an interesting article.


3 posted on 06/10/2013 3:35:37 PM PDT by BBell (And Now for Something Completely Different)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BBell

Sounds like lefties are desperate to find transgenders to add to their revisionist history books. Can’t find one then make one like they tried to do to Lincoln.


5 posted on 06/10/2013 3:39:50 PM PDT by Teflonic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BBell
This is the only picture I could find of the real Virgin Queen.


6 posted on 06/10/2013 3:41:10 PM PDT by laweeks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BBell

Hard to say as most English women look like guys in drag ;)


7 posted on 06/10/2013 3:43:41 PM PDT by trapped_in_LA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BBell

Bunch of hooey.


10 posted on 06/10/2013 4:04:04 PM PDT by Irenic (The pencil sharpener and Elmer's glue is put away-- we've lost the red wheel barrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BBell
Interesting....for sure the Queen was one ugly "woman"...

The portraits in the article are very revealing...

11 posted on 06/10/2013 4:07:06 PM PDT by Popman (Godlessness is always the first step to the concentration camp.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BBell
' Is this proof the Virgin Queen was an imposter in drag?'

Well, Boy George got away with it for a couple of years.........


21 posted on 06/10/2013 4:42:00 PM PDT by Viking2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: windcliff; stylecouncilor

What’s an Elizabethan to do? ping....


30 posted on 06/10/2013 5:28:32 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BBell
All I could think of while reading this is: "it's a boy. And somebody said, 'But it hasn't got a winkle!' And then I said, 'A boy without a winkle? God be praised, it's a miracle. A boy without a winkle!' And then Sir Thomas Moore pointed out that a boy without a winkle is a girl."

if this is true, then Nursie was wrong, and Elizabeth did, in fact, have a winkle.

Name that program!

31 posted on 06/10/2013 5:44:53 PM PDT by Tanniker Smith (Rome didn't fall in a day, either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BBell

Nope. It requires too many people in the know not saying anything.


32 posted on 06/10/2013 5:46:51 PM PDT by SkyDancer (Live your life in such a way that the Westboro church will want to picket your funeral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BBell

Also: the Earl of Oxford wrote all of Shakespeare’s plays.


34 posted on 06/10/2013 5:57:19 PM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BBell

Quentin Crisp played Elizabeth in a movie. That’s proof enough for me.


38 posted on 06/10/2013 6:54:27 PM PDT by Oratam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BBell
‘Elizabeth’s grave has never been breached,’ Berry says. ‘Now it’s time to open it up and see what’s in there.’

When they open it up to satisfy their curiosity, maybe they can do some justice for Mary by burying her separately from Bloody Bess.

39 posted on 06/10/2013 7:15:45 PM PDT by Slyfox (Without the Right to Life, all other rights are meaningless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BBell
Now she was dead, and when the king discovered it, Parry and Lady Ashley would surely be executed. Their sole duty had been to keep the princess safe: failure was treason. ... They would be bound and dragged through the mud for a mile to the scaffold. There they would be hanged, cut down and disembowelled. Their entrails would be hauled from their bodies and held in front of their faces as they died, and then their limbs would be hacked off and displayed on spikes, to be picked bare by the birds.

Oh, nonsense.

Royal children died all the time. Like everybody else's kids. AFAIK, there is no incident in English history where the child's guardians were executed for it.

Female traitors were not executed in this way, out of respect for modesty. They were burned alive instead.

42 posted on 06/11/2013 1:44:20 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BBell
'She described herself as a Virgin Queen, and vowed she would never take a husband, even if the Emperor of Spain offered her .. his oldest son.'
Well heck, who can blame her?

She knew that the moment they were married he'd bring his whole dang family over --- and there goes England.

44 posted on 06/11/2013 12:00:07 PM PDT by Condor51 (Si vis pacem, para bellum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson