To: re_nortex
Spot on. Our education system should of have made such elementary grammer grammar idiums idioms a core part of learning. The unionized teachers could care less about good sintax syntax anymore. Their They're more interested in just the paycheck irregardless of anything else. Its a shame what these loosers losers are teaching our children. *Sigh*
12 posted on
06/21/2013 2:00:05 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Religious faith in government is far crazier than religious faith in God.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
C'mon...did I really need to put a /s on that post? Seriesly? :-)
To: E. Pluribus Unum; re_nortex
Deliberate irony is lost in the translation sometimes...
*Sigh*
18 posted on
06/21/2013 2:02:30 PM PDT by
MortMan
(Disarming the sheep only emboldens the wolves.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I think you missed the sarcasm.
19 posted on
06/21/2013 2:03:09 PM PDT by
Maceman
(Just say "NO" to tyranny.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Is it could care less or couldn’t care less?
28 posted on
06/21/2013 2:07:46 PM PDT by
EQAndyBuzz
(The reason we own guns is to protect ourselves from those wanting to take our guns from us.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Is it could care less or couldn’t care less?
34 posted on
06/21/2013 2:12:03 PM PDT by
EQAndyBuzz
(The reason we own guns is to protect ourselves from those wanting to take our guns from us.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
You missed two: “could **not** care less” and “its” should be “it’s” (contraction not possessive).
:)
37 posted on
06/21/2013 2:12:52 PM PDT by
nanetteclaret
(Unreconstructed Catholic Texan)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
“*Sigh* “
I’m doing some head shaking here too.
.
38 posted on
06/21/2013 2:13:58 PM PDT by
Mears
To: E. Pluribus Unum
44 posted on
06/21/2013 2:18:37 PM PDT by
jiggyboy
(Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
You reckon that was a joke? Surely no one would jump on someone for grammar and blow it that badly. What do they say? Guilt dog barks first.
45 posted on
06/21/2013 2:19:11 PM PDT by
X-spurt
(Republic of Texas, Come and Take It!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum; re_nortex
Ah.... E. PU, you do realize that RE_NORTEX did that on porpoise, don’t you ? It was grammatical satyr.
48 posted on
06/21/2013 2:22:41 PM PDT by
UCANSEE2
(The monsters are due on Maple Street)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I suspect he was having a joke. Nobody could misspell that many words and molest that many homonyms in one comment by accident.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
