Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vanity - Kubrick and The Shining. Questions.
8 9 13

Posted on 08/09/2013 6:56:54 PM PDT by InvisibleChurch

I've come across some youtube videos and some articles about how intricately made was The Shining, that it is filled with a hotel layout which doesn't make sense. And that there are clues within that supports the idea he filmed a fake moon landing. While I don't believe the lunar excursion was faked I'm convinced that Kubrick gave an awful lot of thought and effort in his movies. Are there any books or videos you might recommend about Kubrick?


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: cinema; film; kubrick; movies; shining; stanleykubrick; theshining
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
To: InvisibleChurch

I think that The Shining was an allegory about man’s inability to understand why you have to have more than one fork at a place setting.


21 posted on 08/09/2013 7:29:46 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

She really is astonishingly ugly. Odd that she was able to have a career in the movies.


22 posted on 08/09/2013 7:31:17 PM PDT by Straight Vermonter (Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

That is great!


23 posted on 08/09/2013 7:32:02 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: blueunicorn6

I guess you ould take an antihistamine for it. Thanks though.


24 posted on 08/09/2013 7:32:21 PM PDT by InvisibleChurch (http://thegatwickview.tumblr.com/ http://thepurginglutheran.tumblr.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

Here ya go :

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/03/28/the-most-eccentric-conspiracy-theories-on-the-shining-in-room-237.html


25 posted on 08/09/2013 7:32:30 PM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter
There's only one role she was absolutely,positively born to play:


26 posted on 08/09/2013 7:36:37 PM PDT by massmike (At the heart of every Paul-bot argument is the fear that someone will keep them from their weed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

The Simpson’s parody of The Shining is quite funny....in a Homeresque way.


27 posted on 08/09/2013 7:37:04 PM PDT by newfreep (Breitbart sent me...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

The book was scary. The movie wasn’t. Unless you consider a tedious move scary.

“Eyes Wide Shut” has to be seen to be believed. Proof positive that Kubrick is the most overrated director in cinema history.


28 posted on 08/09/2013 7:37:12 PM PDT by CaptainK (...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

Shelley Duvall was adorable. She made gawky sexy.


29 posted on 08/09/2013 7:39:16 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888

BTTT


30 posted on 08/09/2013 7:39:42 PM PDT by bigheadfred (INFIDEL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

Born to play olive oyl


31 posted on 08/09/2013 7:46:09 PM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

Kubrick reminds me of Kurosawa with a touch of Bergman thrown in for fun.


32 posted on 08/09/2013 7:47:14 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

Kubrick did such a masterful job with 2001, I guess if anyone believes the lunar landings were faked, then he would be a prime suspect. I read The Shining when it was published and I loved it and was disappointed with the movie, especially when the Scatman Cruthers character is killed by Jack Nicholson. Unnecessary, ant-climatic and not true to the book.


33 posted on 08/09/2013 7:47:34 PM PDT by Atticus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch
They recently had a tribute to Kubrick at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art.

They had roomfuls of his work: photos, movie cels, props, scripts, etc. There might have been some sort of book created for this event that you could purchase.

34 posted on 08/09/2013 7:50:31 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

Thank you. I appreciate that.


35 posted on 08/09/2013 7:53:22 PM PDT by InvisibleChurch (http://thegatwickview.tumblr.com/ http://thepurginglutheran.tumblr.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch
I always thought Stanley Kubrick was overrated and pretentious.

People try to find intelligent messages in his films but they aren't there.

An early movie about the robbery of a racetrack was one of his best. 2001 Space Odyssey was terrible and almost unwatchable. Only high school students who were totally stoned could bear to sit through it.

Full Metal Jacket was ok in parts but too long. I saw the Shining when it first came out. It wasn't scary or suspenseful. It was just long and boring. Shelley Duval was annoying. Barry Lyndon was actually pretty good. Eyes Wide Shut was ok. But none of his films were intellectual masterpieces as the have been portrayed.

36 posted on 08/09/2013 7:53:36 PM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

37 posted on 08/09/2013 7:57:14 PM PDT by Delta 21 (Oh Crap !! Did I say that out loud ??!??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

Just watched a lot of that, and the one about the furniture.

Mr. Ager’s analysis is certainly enthusiastic, but in my opinion these are, in fact, simply continuity errors.


38 posted on 08/09/2013 7:57:41 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

I am a fan of Kubrick. I find the imagery that he utilized in all of his films to be staggering and truly brilliant on an intellectual level that escapes most. The hotel layout always baffled me, as well. I find two or three plausible intentions.

1.) It carried the importance of the maze inside - a confusing inner battle.

2.) It was a visual image of the nonsensical battle in Jack’s mind.

3.) It visualized the battle between Danny’s willingness to confront and Jack’s inability to come to terms with what was taking place.

I have always wondered why Kubrick chose to kill Jack using ice rather than the fire that King chose in the novel. Why? It seemed to me that King’s inferno from the boiler explosion was a permanent end. Was Kubrick’s freezing scene merely to represent a potential ‘preservation’, like freezing a roast? I could spend hours talking about Kubrick and the Shining and Eyes Wide Shut in particular.

I’ve read ‘The Philosophy of Stanley Kubrick’ and enjoyed doing so. My favorite read on Kubrick, to date has been ‘On Kubrick’ by James Naremore - it focused more on discussing his films rather than the man.


39 posted on 08/09/2013 8:02:06 PM PDT by RobertClark (My shrink just killed himself - he blamed me in his note!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective
Funny you should say

" Only high school students who were totally stoned could bear to sit through it."

I saw 2001 with 2 high school friends who were both stoned ( I was not). Their viewing experience consisted of running back and forth into the bathroom where their squeals of laughter rang throughout the theater.

40 posted on 08/09/2013 8:02:18 PM PDT by CaptainK (...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson